1 year ICP results ALL FOR REEF

Pod_01

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2022
Messages
1,505
Reaction score
1,417
Location
Waterloo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In the video the presenter mentions that sample contents may precipitate out of the solution.

No idea which elements of any would be affected by this, much less Zinc specifically.
I honestly am not seeing how that can happen.
Unless the sample had elevated calcium, alk, pH precipitation is not just going to start for no reason.

Maybe it was genetic statement, this can possibly happen under some extreme conditions…

Usual suspects for precipitation are calcium, magnesium, phosphate…
Zinc will bind as Randy mentioned…
 

Otago

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 12, 2025
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I honestly am not seeing how that can happen.
Unless the sample had elevated calcium, alk, pH precipitation is not just going to start for no reason.

Maybe it was genetic statement, this can possibly happen under some extreme conditions…

Usual suspects for precipitation are calcium, magnesium, phosphate…
Zinc will bind as Randy mentioned…

If the sample freezes this can happen, the brine that hasn't frozen can form precipitates. If the sample tube is full then the brine can also leak out.

Just like you say though, these are extreme conditions, but they are possible if shipping in winter.
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If the sample freezes this can happen, the brine that hasn't frozen can form precipitates. If the sample tube is full then the brine can also leak out.

Just like you say though, these are extreme conditions, but they are possible if shipping in winter.

We had Triton test that and they did not find a change, but freezing is a concern if the sample tube is filled too full, pushing material out of the tube. Oceamo gives instructions to avoid that by leaving an air space in the tube.
 

Otago

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 12, 2025
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
We had Triton test that and they did not find a change, but freezing is a concern if the sample tube is filled too full, pushing material out of the tube. Oceamo gives instructions to avoid that by leaving an air space in the tube.
Thanks for the correction, do you know if it was because the precipitates went back into solution or there were no precipitates formed ?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the correction, do you know if it was because the precipitates went back into solution or there were no precipitates formed ?

My concern at the time was formation of calcium carbonate, which would not redissolve if it was aragonite or calcite. But apparently the crystal form that dominates at low temps is ikaite, which will redissolve when warmed.

I will noe that Triton was not using icp-ms at the time so some trace elements were not tracked, being below the detection limit.
 

AKReefing

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2023
Messages
677
Reaction score
583
Location
Fairbanks
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Icp company targets and ranges rarely if ever show justification of those targets.
So where do they get those targets and ranges from? Does an actual list of targets and ranges exist? If not, then what is the justification to conduct ICP testing at all?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So where do they get those targets and ranges from? Does an actual list of targets and ranges exist? If not, then what is the justification to conduct ICP testing at all?

I cannot say how they determine their ranges, but there are natural range levels in the ocean, though for trace elements they can vary by location. Some folks and supplement companies have opinions on what works best for them and their customers.
 

AKReefing

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2023
Messages
677
Reaction score
583
Location
Fairbanks
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I cannot say how they determine their ranges, but there are natural range levels in the ocean, though for trace elements they can vary by location. Some folks and supplement companies have opinions on what works best for them and their customers.
Has anyone compared those opinions to ICP recommended ranges and various reef ranges? Seems like this might be available to those in the scientific community.

TM claims their salt contains 'all major and minor elements in the exact proportions found in tropical sea water." Notwithstanding the variations in different bodies of seawater, what's keeping them from listing all of the elements and the proportions?
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Has anyone compared those opinions to ICP recommended ranges and various reef ranges? Seems like this might be available to those in the scientific community.

TM claims their salt contains 'all major and minor elements in the exact proportions found in tropical sea water." Notwithstanding the variations in different bodies of seawater, what's keeping them from listing all of the elements and the proportions?

Nothing is keeping them from doing it, but I understand why they do not. Since analytical testing at the hobby level is not perfect, should they have to replace someone’s bucket because they got a result that didn’t match the claims or claimed range, even if it’s a testing error?
 
OP
OP
8

805reeftank

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2024
Messages
151
Reaction score
64
Location
santa maria
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
30 day ICP update: couple observations

I made some of Randy’s diy calibration fluid and set my refractometer at 1.026 and set my salinity at 1.024-1.025 just in case I screwed up on the solution. So I feel comfortable moving my salinity up to the 1.026 now.

Iodine: my iodine shot up quite a bit, could be 2 things the isol8 or my carbon it was barely flowing any water because it was clogged. On the ICP says active carbon can bring down iodine.

Zinc: concerning just about doubled think I’m going to put a ploy filter see if it soaks up the zinc.

Just about everything elevated so I think I’m going to pull the isol8 or reduce by 1/2.

RODI zinc is now gone, two things I changed. I added the flush valve on the membrane. And I collected straight from the RODI line instead of the holding container. So either the jug is leeching zinc or the flush did the trick we’ll see on the next ICP I’ll pull from the same jug with flushed water.

To my eye my lps seem fuller/fluffy and that was immediate after the isol8 and salinity change looking back I would have liked to adjusted the salinity first but oh well. Color seems to getting better but that’s just my eye I’ll post pics for judgment.

Conception my dose has gone up from 50ml to 65ml over the last 30days. Isol8 helping? Who knows.




ISIMG-858761.jpeg
ISIMG-858756.jpeg
ISIMG-860027.jpeg


RODI
ISIMG-860064.jpeg
ISIMG-861936.jpeg
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Iodine: my iodine shot up quite a bit, could be 2 things the isol8 or my carbon it was barely flowing any water because it was clogged. On the ICP says active carbon can bring down iodine.

What company is this icp? That info about iodine binding to GAC is not correct, and suggests the company posting it is not thinking very deeply.
 

areefer01

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,996
Reaction score
4,259
Location
Ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What company is this icp? That info about iodine binding to GAC is not correct, and suggests the company posting it is not thinking very deeply.

Based on the format that appears to be from ATI. I went back through my data and see that I had high iodine back in May of 2024. Their recommendation under the Iodine field was to use activated carbon. Since I am only using the test results for trending I did not act on their recommendation.

I do not mean anything by that other than I recall these conversations back on Reef Central in the day so just maintained my course. Next ICP result set it was down (197 -> 98). Not sure why I saw the blip but it has happened a few times over the years :)
 
OP
OP
8

805reeftank

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2024
Messages
151
Reaction score
64
Location
santa maria
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Based on the format that appears to be from ATI. I went back through my data and see that I had high iodine back in May of 2024. Their recommendation under the Iodine field was to use activated carbon. Since I am only using the test results for trending I did not act on their recommendation.

I do not mean anything by that other than I recall these conversations back on Reef Central in the day so just maintained my course. Next ICP result set it was down (197 -> 98). Not sure why I saw the blip but it has happened a few times over the years :)
Ati is correct I already run carbon and it was very lite flow through the carbon. I put new carbon we’ll see what happens
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Based on the format that appears to be from ATI. I went back through my data and see that I had high iodine back in May of 2024. Their recommendation under the Iodine field was to use activated carbon. Since I am only using the test results for trending I did not act on their recommendation.

I do not mean anything by that other than I recall these conversations back on Reef Central in the day so just maintained my course. Next ICP result set it was down (197 -> 98). Not sure why I saw the blip but it has happened a few times over the years :)

I understand that it is very long established misinformation that just gets repeated and repeated around the internet. That’s what I meant by not thinking deeply.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,626
Reaction score
77,169
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ati is correct I already run carbon and it was very lite flow through the carbon. I put new carbon we’ll see what happens

I’m not holding my breath in anticipation. It’s just misinformation that is repeated without thinking. Someone long ago read about iodine binding by GAC as a measure of pore area, didn’t have the slightest idea what was going on, and misinterpreted it to think that GAC must bind iodide or iodate from seawater. It doesn’t.

We know it is false, both by chemical understanding, and from measurement. Christoph showed at Oceamo that GAC does not bind significant iodine from seawater.

 
OP
OP
8

805reeftank

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2024
Messages
151
Reaction score
64
Location
santa maria
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
We know what will happen. It’s just misinformation that is repeated without thinking. Someone long ago read about iodine binding by GAC as a measure of pore area, didn’t have the slightest idea what was going on, and misinterpreted it to think that GAC must bind iodide or iodate from seawater. It doesn’t.

We know it is false, both by chemical understanding, and from measurement. Christoph showed at Oceamo that GAC does not bind significant iodine from seawater.

So with this knowledge the iodine elevation is from the isol8. Nothing else has changed dosing wise.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HAVE YOU EVER ACCIDENTALLY FLOODED AN AREA BECAUSE OF YOUR TANK?

  • Yes, It caused major damage.

    Votes: 16 8.6%
  • Yes, but it caused only minor damage.

    Votes: 52 27.8%
  • Yes, but there was no damage.

    Votes: 76 40.6%
  • No, thankfully!

    Votes: 42 22.5%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 1 0.5%
Back
Top