A Deep Dive on Ammonia Neutralizer Chemistry - Prime, ClorAm-X, Rongalite and friends.

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,935
Reaction score
10,689
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Summary (the whole thing in one paragraph)
ClorAm-X is the best-performing of a barely effective product concept. Under the label usage ClorAm-X (but not Prime, or other common products) can be measured to lower the amount of total ammonia in a saltwater sample. This process is slow (24-48hr), requires high amounts of product (hundreds of mg/L of active ingredient), and incomplete (~50% ammonia removal is typical). This can be verified with NH3 sensing films. ClorAm-X is an adduct of formaldehyde and sulfite, and partially dissociates into those two pieces in order to work, with the sulfite part responsible for dechlorination and both parts needed for the ammonia removal. Prime and other “ammonia neutralizer” products also contain the same chemical compound as ClorAm-X, or a similar compound - rongalite - an adduct of formaldehyde and sulfoxylate, or as in the case of Prime, are a mix of both compounds. These products can all be measured with titrations using bleach to quantify the sulfite/sulfoxylate dechlorinator and a subsequent titration for the formaldehyde after the dechlorinator is gone. The amounts of the active ingredients in recommended doses of these “ammonia neutralizer” products are small, safe doses that are far below the amounts actually needed to do anything measurable to remove ammonia.

Topic outline
  • Part 1: Ammonia neutralizer performance head to head
  • Part 2: Details of ClorAm-X performance: dosage, amount reduction, time
  • Part 3: Why/How Does Cloram-X work? Chemistry of HMS
  • Part 4: How are other products different? Chemistry of Rongalite compared to HMS
  • Part 5: Why do other Products not work? Measurements of product ingredients.
  • Part 6: Extras - Overdose toxicity concerns, nitrification effects. Test method interference.


Part 1: Ammonia neutralizer performance head to head

How much can these products actually reduce the amount of total ammonia in a sample of aquarium water? Do they all work similarly well at their recommended doses?
To evaluate this, 2ppm total ammonia in saltwater was treated with ClorAm-X, Prime, and Aqueon Ammonia Neutralizer. These three products represent two different but closely related chemicals: Hydroxymethanesulfonate (ClorAm-X), Rongalite (Aqueon), and a mix of the two (Prime). Each product was dosed at 1x and 10x of the standard dose - corresponding to the maximum allowed by the ClorAm-X label instructions. The maximum label-allowable doses of Prime and Aqueon products are not more than this. Measurements after 24 hours of reaction time were made via a Seneye NH3-sensing film that had been calibrated against known total ammonia and pH values. Measurements via NH3 sensor - film or ion selective electrode - is necessary to bypass the interference that these compounds and any other dechlorinator/reducer has on a chemical total ammonia test. Details on the seneye calibration and measurement work by @Dan_P can be found in this thread.

AD_4nXehUdmhzvbXGQGWJe-6u9ZY5rJGel7gQRZT5P7eLa-r1cufSTL4ScqY1icLAH07obrQ6iV-mxEhZGjf3lSCFW5yI40diJbo08pYN0C-KOSvBhgKkCpgR22p-PzEFNO0kxofYp1_jZtOuqVtMZzdYPu8gog

Figure 1 percent of 2ppm total ammonia remaining after 24 hours with 1x and 10x of three ammonia removal products. Red bar is the only data with statistically significant difference.

The amount (as a percent) of remaining total ammonia after 24 hours is plotted - with the control corrected to 100%. Given the measurements needed to generate these calculated values - free ammonia, pH, temperature - the uncertainty is larger than the differences between the control and any of the treatments, except for the 10x ClorAm-X.
This result seems to suggest that despite the similarity in active ingredients, only one of these products has detectable ammonia reduction under label usage conditions (if the detection attempts are very careful!). Let’s look closer at the performance details to determine under what circumstances actual ammonia reduction might be seen: when, at what dosages, and how much reduction?


Part 2: Details of ClorAm-X performance: dosage, amount reduction, time

For most of this section, we’ll focus on the most effective version of this product, ClorAm-X, which is chemically sodium hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS for short) and later we’ll revisit what the other related chemicals do. We’ve done a number of tests previously, and failed to find detectable ammonia decrease - so this section is about demonstrating what conditions are actually needed for detectable ammonia removal to occur.
What does varying the dosage from low to well above the label amounts show for ammonia reduction?
In this test, the same setup as above was used, except that 10ppm total ammonia was present in the samples. Measurements via Seneye (calibrated against standards) were made at 24 hours.

AD_4nXdJBwn8Ko7-9z587XzoYnV248zr-EyuQMmh1Y0c9kWTnknirjrr5AVbd7Pii8luK9cJqyKp9anoRtk7y6OHBa_nyj3umOy0EYB29DfO1inbs0UinOm0QsDqRbt_hSMTH7EY9vF-cvZbL37_lEw2xNfesJG9

Figure 2 Percent of 10ppm total ammonia remaining after 24 hours with 1x, 10x, 100x of ClorAm-X. Red bars for statistical significance.

As before the 1x dose of ClorAm-X does not remove ammonia enough to be detectable given the measurement uncertainties. A 10x and 100x dose both reduce ammonia by easily measurable amounts. But even these large doses (~320 and ~3200mg/L of HMS) do not remove substantially all of the ammonia. Regardless of the large amount of the product added - the ammonia removal is only partial.
Here’s the same trend illustrated by measurements done on many samples.

AD_4nXfHz50XQ1m90Hzvtq9xiU9j5JrUtF0N0IIyuMGaaVbsOELqmJkUzX7Ljzz4Dt1g7vWM4ZoKFLnYyLm2rcF55udDWRbhNOkbXP3KEvBR9MmvNsWGU9t9jOtHsrkpukDfLrAO5Euh3t_4vhFlAszF9E7jZzU

Figure 3 Total Ammonia remaining at 24 hrs plotted vs amount of HMS used. Blue data is 4:1 molar ratio of HMS:Ammonia, Green data is 85:1 molar ratio, and the Orange data is a fixed amount of HMS with varied levels of total ammonia. The x-axis is in mM of HMS with red numbers on the axis indicating how many multiples of the recommended label dosage are being used.

The trend here is clear, significant ammonia decrease is possible and certainly happens with this chemical - but only if guidelines about allowable maximum dosages are thoroughly exceeded. Red numbers on x-axis are multiples of recommended dose - 10x being the highest allowable by product instructions.
This can also be observed without a Seneye, using NH3 sensing films by seachem or others.
This is what 1ppm total ammonia looks like after ~2 days treated with a 30x dose of ClorAm-X. After 2 days, the pH was corrected to 7.6 in each 500mL sample for a couple of hours and then disks removed to the small plastic wells for the picture.
AD_4nXfYvB4LbNzoNp5KxsS3avOY1J91EkgBHiNIjNj1X5dqcvoXXx7cSlf9nntp8H9ZuUs6QnysYmWPrnz_UTBARL0sRaLFxme92sq9IumI55_9QTsWyl0ykSI4OU_IiMbK7ssf0lpi8ClrMSXWWVe8RZd0U5MU

Figure 4 Total Ammonia removal detectable by seachem NH3-sensitive films. Left: just ammonia, center: no ammonia with ClorAm-X, right: ammonia+ClorAm-X.

While precisely quantifying the ammonia removal here based on these colors would be essentially impossible, it is roughly consistent with the measurements in Fig. 3 where 30x ClorAm-X might be expected to have somewhere around 50-70% of total ammonia remaining after 48 hours.

How does the ammonia removal progress with time?
Here’s what the ammonia removal rate looks like for total ammonia starting at ~8ppm when treated with ~50x dose of ClorAm-X and measured over 24 hours. For these measurements, pH was repeatedly corrected back to 8.0 so the measurements with the calibrated Seneye could be done in a consistent way.



AD_4nXcj2Rta94TJM42is_3zKvjFr13lxTbQc_OWrq6yv-SYf7XwWa7MvpZ47crS1KJTU_UXgsDlgECy57YmUN0SRfA2UbZob0EQAWef_TKXZz7xJ-nJzTdiH9hOe60bbmbMtnyrOsiKaWrwgBDTa1_DBkC8lmIz

Figure 5 Total Ammonia remaining (as a percent) vs time over 24 hours. About the same amount is removed in the first 3 hours as from 3 to 24 hours.

This amount of ClorAm-X is the same as the dosages that generated about 50% ammonia removal in Fig 3. It should be noted again that this dosage (50x) is far higher than the maximum allowable by label instructions (10x).
In the first hour, very little of the eventual effect has occurred. After 3 hours about half of the eventual 24 hour effect has taken place, meaning that a significant part of the desired reaction takes longer than 3 hours to occur.

(Part 3 & 4 tomorrow)
Parts 3 & 4 here
 
Last edited:

Formulator

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
2,549
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Prime and other “ammonia neutralizer” products also contain the same chemical compound as ClorAm-X, or a similar compound - rongalite - an adduct of formaldehyde and sulfoxylate, or as in the case of Prime, are a mix of both compounds.
Where did we get this information?
 
OP
OP
taricha

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,935
Reaction score
10,689
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Where did we get this information?
That's mostly going to be in here...
Part 5: Why do other Products not work? Measurements of product ingredients.

Wait prime has formaldehyde and they don't mention that ANYWHERE?
That's not exactly true. We're talking about compound, from which a small amount breaks apart to release formaldehyde and sulfite.
In the products themselves, it is bound together and is not formaldehyde.

More on this in part 3 & 4.
 
Last edited:

GlassMunky

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
3,326
Reaction score
4,409
Location
NJ-Philly Burbs
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I disagree. They cause damage to the body which can lead cancer. So it is in fact causing the cancer indirectly.
Incorrect. Because someone could be exposed to those same chemicle and not develop cancer. Same way someone can smoke 3 pack a day and never get lung cancer yet someone who has never smoked can.

Correlation is not causation
 

GlassMunky

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
3,326
Reaction score
4,409
Location
NJ-Philly Burbs
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Genetics play a far bigger role in whether someone will develop cancer over anything environental. Example: BRCA 1 and BRCA2
 

KrisReef

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
15,153
Reaction score
31,113
Location
ADX Florence
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No clue. I am just surprised that any amount of it an be undisclosed given it clearly causes cancer.
My go to shampoo has been discontinued because it contains coal tar which has trace amounts of benzene which is also a recognized cancer causing concern. I don’t care, it helps control the flakes from my autoimmune disease and the low levels of benzene don’t worry me as much as my flakes do.

The shampoo is much more effective than the ammonia remover being discussed and I wonder if the aquarium products will disappear after this article reveals the presence of formaldehyde?

Edit: come to think of it, I wonder if the product could be used to treat parasites in marine fish?
 

Formulator

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
2,549
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wonder if the aquarium products will disappear after this article reveals the presence of formaldehyde?
I highly doubt they will even blink an eye. I was going to suggest putting this work into a white-paper and publishing it. That might actually get their attention.
 

Formulator

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
2,549
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Summary (the whole thing in one paragraph)
ClorAm-X is the best-performing of a barely effective product concept. Under the label usage ClorAm-X (but not Prime, or other common products) can be measured to lower the amount of total ammonia in a saltwater sample. This process is slow (24-48hr), requires high amounts of product (hundreds of mg/L of active ingredient), and incomplete (~50% ammonia removal is typical). This can be verified with NH3 sensing films. ClorAm-X is an adduct of formaldehyde and sulfite, and partially dissociates into those two pieces in order to work, with the sulfite part responsible for dechlorination and both parts needed for the ammonia removal. Prime and other “ammonia neutralizer” products also contain the same chemical compound as ClorAm-X, or a similar compound - rongalite - an adduct of formaldehyde and sulfoxylate, or as in the case of Prime, are a mix of both compounds. These products can all be measured with titrations using bleach to quantify the sulfite/sulfoxylate dechlorinator and a subsequent titration for the formaldehyde after the dechlorinator is gone. The amounts of the active ingredients in recommended doses of these “ammonia neutralizer” products are small, safe doses that are far below the amounts actually needed to do anything measurable to remove ammonia.

Topic outline
  • Part 1: Ammonia neutralizer performance head to head
  • Part 2: Details of ClorAm-X performance: dosage, amount reduction, time
  • Part 3: Why/How Does Cloram-X work? Chemistry of HMS
  • Part 4: How are other products different? Chemistry of Rongalite compared to HMS
  • Part 5: Why do other Products not work? Measurements of product ingredients.
  • Part 6: Extras - Overdose toxicity concerns, nitrification effects. Test method interference.


Part 1: Ammonia neutralizer performance head to head

How much can these products actually reduce the amount of total ammonia in a sample of aquarium water? Do they all work similarly well at their recommended doses?
To evaluate this, 2ppm total ammonia in saltwater was treated with ClorAm-X, Prime, and Aqueon Ammonia Neutralizer. These three products represent two different but closely related chemicals: Hydroxymethanesulfonate (ClorAm-X), Rongalite (Aqueon), and a mix of the two (Prime). Each product was dosed at 1x and 10x of the standard dose - corresponding to the maximum allowed by the ClorAm-X label instructions. The maximum label-allowable doses of Prime and Aqueon products are not more than this. Measurements after 24 hours of reaction time were made via a Seneye NH3-sensing film that had been calibrated against known total ammonia and pH values. Measurements via NH3 sensor - film or ion selective electrode - is necessary to bypass the interference that these compounds and any other dechlorinator/reducer has on a chemical total ammonia test. Details on the seneye calibration and measurement work by @Dan_P can be found in this thread.

AD_4nXehUdmhzvbXGQGWJe-6u9ZY5rJGel7gQRZT5P7eLa-r1cufSTL4ScqY1icLAH07obrQ6iV-mxEhZGjf3lSCFW5yI40diJbo08pYN0C-KOSvBhgKkCpgR22p-PzEFNO0kxofYp1_jZtOuqVtMZzdYPu8gog

Figure 1 percent of 2ppm total ammonia remaining after 24 hours with 1x and 10x of three ammonia removal products. Red bar is the only data with statistically significant difference.

The amount (as a percent) of remaining total ammonia after 24 hours is plotted - with the control corrected to 100%. Given the measurements needed to generate these calculated values - free ammonia, pH, temperature - the uncertainty is larger than the differences between the control and any of the treatments, except for the 10x ClorAm-X.
This result seems to suggest that despite the similarity in active ingredients, only one of these products has detectable ammonia reduction under label usage conditions (if the detection attempts are very careful!). Let’s look closer at the performance details to determine under what circumstances actual ammonia reduction might be seen: when, at what dosages, and how much reduction?


Part 2: Details of ClorAm-X performance: dosage, amount reduction, time

For most of this section, we’ll focus on the most effective version of this product, ClorAm-X, which is chemically sodium hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS for short) and later we’ll revisit what the other related chemicals do. We’ve done a number of tests previously, and failed to find detectable ammonia decrease - so this section is about demonstrating what conditions are actually needed for detectable ammonia removal to occur.
What does varying the dosage from low to well above the label amounts show for ammonia reduction?
In this test, the same setup as above was used, except that 10ppm total ammonia was present in the samples. Measurements via Seneye (calibrated against standards) were made at 24 hours.

AD_4nXdJBwn8Ko7-9z587XzoYnV248zr-EyuQMmh1Y0c9kWTnknirjrr5AVbd7Pii8luK9cJqyKp9anoRtk7y6OHBa_nyj3umOy0EYB29DfO1inbs0UinOm0QsDqRbt_hSMTH7EY9vF-cvZbL37_lEw2xNfesJG9

Figure 2 Percent of 10ppm total ammonia remaining after 24 hours with 1x, 10x, 100x of ClorAm-X. Red bars for statistical significance.

As before the 1x dose of ClorAm-X does not remove ammonia enough to be detectable given the measurement uncertainties. A 10x and 100x dose both reduce ammonia by easily measurable amounts. But even these large doses (~320 and ~3200mg/L of HMS) do not remove substantially all of the ammonia. Regardless of the large amount of the product added - the ammonia removal is only partial.
Here’s the same trend illustrated by measurements done on many samples.

AD_4nXfHz50XQ1m90Hzvtq9xiU9j5JrUtF0N0IIyuMGaaVbsOELqmJkUzX7Ljzz4Dt1g7vWM4ZoKFLnYyLm2rcF55udDWRbhNOkbXP3KEvBR9MmvNsWGU9t9jOtHsrkpukDfLrAO5Euh3t_4vhFlAszF9E7jZzU

Figure 3 Total Ammonia remaining at 24 hrs plotted vs amount of HMS used. Blue data is 4:1 molar ratio of HMS:Ammonia, Green data is 85:1 molar ratio, and the Orange data is a fixed amount of HMS with varied levels of total ammonia. The x-axis is in mM of HMS with red numbers on the axis indicating how many multiples of the recommended label dosage are being used.

The trend here is clear, significant ammonia decrease is possible and certainly happens with this chemical - but only if guidelines about allowable maximum dosages are thoroughly exceeded. Red numbers on x-axis are multiples of recommended dose - 10x being the highest allowable by product instructions.
This can also be observed without a Seneye, using NH3 sensing films by seachem or others.
This is what 1ppm total ammonia looks like after ~2 days treated with a 30x dose of ClorAm-X. After 2 days, the pH was corrected to 7.6 in each 500mL sample for a couple of hours and then disks removed to the small plastic wells for the picture.
AD_4nXfYvB4LbNzoNp5KxsS3avOY1J91EkgBHiNIjNj1X5dqcvoXXx7cSlf9nntp8H9ZuUs6QnysYmWPrnz_UTBARL0sRaLFxme92sq9IumI55_9QTsWyl0ykSI4OU_IiMbK7ssf0lpi8ClrMSXWWVe8RZd0U5MU

Figure 4 Total Ammonia removal detectable by seachem NH3-sensitive films. Left: just ammonia, center: no ammonia with ClorAm-X, right: ammonia+ClorAm-X.

While precisely quantifying the ammonia removal here based on these colors would be essentially impossible, it is roughly consistent with the measurements in Fig. 3 where 30x ClorAm-X might be expected to have somewhere around 50-70% of total ammonia remaining after 48 hours.

How does the ammonia removal progress with time?
Here’s what the ammonia removal rate looks like for total ammonia starting at ~8ppm when treated with ~50x dose of ClorAm-X and measured over 24 hours. For these measurements, pH was repeatedly corrected back to 8.0 so the measurements with the calibrated Seneye could be done in a consistent way.



AD_4nXcj2Rta94TJM42is_3zKvjFr13lxTbQc_OWrq6yv-SYf7XwWa7MvpZ47crS1KJTU_UXgsDlgECy57YmUN0SRfA2UbZob0EQAWef_TKXZz7xJ-nJzTdiH9hOe60bbmbMtnyrOsiKaWrwgBDTa1_DBkC8lmIz

Figure 5 Total Ammonia remaining (as a percent) vs time over 24 hours. About the same amount is removed in the first 3 hours as from 3 to 24 hours.

This amount of ClorAm-X is the same as the dosages that generated about 50% ammonia removal in Fig 3. It should be noted again that this dosage (50x) is far higher than the maximum allowable by label instructions (10x).
In the first hour, very little of the eventual effect has occurred. After 3 hours about half of the eventual 24 hour effect has taken place, meaning that a significant part of the desired reaction takes longer than 3 hours to occur.

(Part 3 & 4 tomorrow)
Are you going to get into the chemistry behind your disks and why you are convinced they are an accurate way to measure ammonia detoxification by the mechanism employed by Prime and other products?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
71,824
Reaction score
69,443
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are you going to get into the chemistry behind your disks and why you are convinced they are an accurate way to measure ammonia detoxification by the mechanism employed by Prime and other products?

You mean the Seachem disks that Seachem says are suitable for detecting the effect of their product?

However, the best solution ;-) is to use our MultiTest™ Ammonia kit; it uses a gas exchange sensor system which is not affected by the presence of Prime® or other similar products. It also has the added advantage that it can detect the more dangerous free ammonia and distinguish it from total ammonia (total ammonia is both free ammonia and non-toxic ionized forms of ammonia).
 

Formulator

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
2,549
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You mean the Seachem disks that Seachem says are suitable for detecting the effect of their product?

However, the best solution ;-) is to use our MultiTest™ Ammonia kit; it uses a gas exchange sensor system which is not affected by the presence of Prime® or other similar products. It also has the added advantage that it can detect the more dangerous free ammonia and distinguish it from total ammonia (total ammonia is both free ammonia and non-toxic ionized forms of ammonia).
Yes those. We are already questioning the validity of their Prime product, so why would we take them at their word to understand their own tests?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW ARE YOUR CORALS DOING TODAY? HONEST ANSWERS ONLY!

  • Everything seems to be doing great!

    Votes: 21 20.2%
  • Almost everything is doing good!

    Votes: 35 33.7%
  • Some are doing good, others not so much...

    Votes: 24 23.1%
  • They're okay, I guess.

    Votes: 12 11.5%
  • They're not doing too well right now.

    Votes: 8 7.7%
  • Not good at all...

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 2.9%
Back
Top