Beginner Series #2: How and Why Do Water Changes Work? What Happens If They Don't Work?

Greg Gdowski

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
337
Reaction score
757
Location
Rochester, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Seawitch submitted a new Article:

Beginner Series #2: How and Why Do Water Changes Work?
What Happens If They Don't Work?

Or How to Attain Majchrzak Status

This article is to provide beginners with baseline knowledge of why and how water changes work and when they fail in restoring critical water parameters, so that dosing alternatives might be employed. I will also address many misconceptions about water changes.

Image 1: Junior's Reef by Gary Majchrzak. A system that the author has always emulated.
r2rgarypicture1-png.950171

Photo is used with permission from Gary Majchrzak, ©2019, All Rights Reserved.
Introduction

We all give the same advice. If you are new to the hobby, almost every person you will meet, every local fish store you will visit, will repeatedly tell you to do water changes. A recent article R2R article by Cynthia White highlighted many aspects of why and how to do water changes (White 2019). All of us initially follow that good advice without really understanding why.

As Cynthia pointed out, we do water changes for many reasons. One primary reason is for removing waste chemicals like nitrates and phosphates. This is important in all tanks, but it is especially true for a new tank as it is being established.

Another important function is for replacing crucial water parameters, such as alkalinity and calcium, that are utilized by corals as they grow. The amount of corals in your tank and their rate of growth will eventually be limited by your ability to replenish the alkalinity and calcium in your tank.

As your tank matures, its needs will change. Your ability to identify those needs and pivot your husbandry approach, will greatly enhance your success.

With water changes being by far the most common method employed for water parameter management, it is important to recognize the signs of change and the need to modify your strategy.

We all have the same ultimate goal. What drew you to the hobby was a visit to the aquarium, a party at a friend’s house with a reef, or perhaps a visit to a local fish store where you became mesmerized by a show-stopping reef tank with walls of colorful corals.

Upstate New York, Rochester in particular, is home to many of these tanks. My goal was always to have a tank like Gary Majchrzak. His first tank that I saw, Junior’s Reef, was nothing short of drop dead stunning (Figure 1). He is one of the local elite, humble, reefing aquarists who creates unequivocally beautiful tanks in our community. And Gary has another enviable quality to go with his reefing skills: a laid-back, relaxed attitude as in "Testing? What testing?"

Hopefully, someone like Gary lives in your community. Like Gary, the reefers that manage those tanks have undoubtedly all mastered the process of effectively replenishing the alkalinity and calcium as fast as the corals are using them. Make no mistake--it is fast, very fast (more on that later).

If you rely solely on water changes to solve this problem when you have that wall of corals in your tank, you are going to be a very unhappy camper.

Here’s why. Let’s start with why we all hate water changes.

My love-hate relationship with water changes. When you bought that 100-gallon tank and someone told you that you would have to do water changes, you probably didn’t even blink an eye. Neither did I. Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the value of water changes, but here is why I hate them just as much.

“As a general guideline, a monthly 25% water change is recommended. However, smaller, more frequent water changes (15-20% every 1-2 weeks) are preferable for heavily stocked aquariums or aquariums with large fish.” (LiveAquaria)

No one probably told you that this is expensive and physically demanding. If you change 20% of your water every week, you will change 1,024gal/yr for a 100-gallon tank. If you have a 30-gallon sump, that increases to 1,352gal/yr.

When buying the tank, the store likely also encouraged you to use a reverse osmosis unit for removing dissolved solids from your home tap water (Hunt 2013). What they didn’t tell you was that the RO unit will waste about 4 gallons of water for every gallon it produces (Timmons 2011). That means you will draw 6,760gal/yr from your home water system.

In addition, you will have to buy seven boxes of reef salt per year (200gal/box) for that 1,352gal of water. At $63/box, that is $441/yr (BulkReefSupply). (Did I hear you say that you bought a 200 gallon tank, not a 100 gallon tank?)

It’s seems to always be a 20 -year-old that tells me it’s no big deal to do water changes!

In my case, I put the RO unit in my basement. Saltwater weighs 8.5 lbs/gal. If you have to lug 26 gallons of new water up the stairs and 26 gallons of old water down the stairs, you are lifting 442lbs/week. That is only 22,984lbs/yr!

When I started this journey, I never did that math. In all honesty, I had to check the calculation a few times before I believed it. Let’s face the facts, this is tolerable for a while but it gets very old in the fifth year. The main reason people eventually leave the hobby is either because of the physicality of conducting water changes, or because of the consequences of not doing them. As I near 60, I absolutely have no vision for lifting 10.5tons/yr of water up and down my basement stairs. For me, something had to change or I was going to eventually quit. (Really – you bought a 200 gallon tank?)

I vividly remember the day I visited a friend whose family owns a local fish store, and I told him that I was going to pursue a Balling method (Balling 2008) to eliminate my need for changing water in my next tank. He told me that I would be chasing water parameters and wasting time on chemical tests when I could have simply changed the water.

That was a hard blow from a valued colleague that I would think about for months as I began my next build. What I learned throughout that journey was where I really missed the boat in doing water changes with my previous tank. Remember, there is a time and place for everything!

Why my last tank never reached “Majchrzak” status! If you couldn’t tell, I really hate water changes with a passion (almost as much as Vortech users hate wires in the water!) Consequently, my strategy with my previous tank went like this. I triggered my water changes on visual observations such as: 1) how dirty the bottom looked, 2) how much algae grew on the side of the tank, and 3) if the corals just didn’t look happy.

Occasionally, I would do a water test, and if it looked off, I would do a bigger water change. This strategy sustained the tank, but it never seemed to get better. The next strategy I tried was to change 20% of the water every week regardless of how the tank looked. While this worked better, I still never managed to achieve consistent success.

My final effort was to use a method of dosing 2-part Bionic solutions made by ESV (ESVAquariumProducts). That worked even better, but I still felt like the tank was underperforming. I never did make “Majchrzak” status with that tank. When it crashed after refinishing floors, I knew it was time for a change.

As fate would have it, Mr. Majchrzak and I started our latest builds almost at the same time. We both took on the goal of no water changes for almost the same reasons. It wasn’t a competition, but at least I knew our bottles of “wine” were starting to mature at the same time and rate. It certainly helped to calibrate my progress.

When you set up a tank with a no-water-change methodology, the “why” and “when” of water changes becomes readily apparent!

The “why” and “when” of water changes. There are numerous common elements of natural sea water that are important in a coral’s overall health (Borneman 2008). Amongst the top seven water parameters described as either essential or critical are alkalinity, calcium and magnesium. The four other elements are salinity, temperature, oxygen, and phosphate.

Alkalinity and calcium are important because they underlie the calcification process of corals. We often ignore this when starting a tank because the waste products produced by our fish are far greater (and far more important) than the utilization of alkalinity and calcium consumed by the few small corals we own.

In a new tank, your water changes will serve to remove the waste products as well as replenish alkalinity and calcium consumption. When your corals grow, they will consume more and more alkalinity on a daily basis.

Figure 1 shows just how fast alkalinity changes can occur in an established tank. In my tank, the alkalinity dropped from 8.12dKH to 6.3dKH over 3 short days after I stopped dosing Aquaforest KH solutions. If I relied on water changes in order to maintain alkalinity values near 8.0dKH, it is likely that I would have to change water multiple times each week. Clearly, water changes are not the solution for me at this point in time. As your tank matures, the big questions will become: 1) When will my water change strategy fail to replenish calcium and alkalinity? 2) How can I tell it is happening? and 3) What can I do about it?

screen-shot-2019-01-19-at-9-25-31-am-png.950174

Figure 1 was created by and is used with permission from Dr. Greg Gdowski, ©2019,
All Rights Reserved.

Let’s run through an example:

Consider the scenario illustrated in Figure 2A. A small amount of corals in a new tank will only consume small amounts of calcium and alkalinity. In this circumstance, your initial consumption rate of alkalinity over time will be small (blue line, Figure 2). Regular 20% water changes every few weeks (red line, Figure 2) will readily restore your alkalinity within the ideal range (yellow highlighted area, Figure 2). At this point in time, there is no need to augment or supplement calcium and alkalinity in your tank. I call this phase a state of happy misguided bliss.

I started this article by saying we all have the same ultimate goal. You will add corals, many corals, likely as many as you can afford (it is an addiction after all – didn’t we tell you that?). Much like an addiction, your desire to add corals will gradually increase your alkalinity consumption (green line, Figure 2A). Eventually, your regular 20% water changes will no longer restore your water parameters and the alkalinity will decline below the ideal range. You should have been testing alkalinity levels all along, nonetheless, the days of test-less bliss are now over if you are to succeed.

screen-shot-2019-01-19-at-9-27-27-am-png.950175

Figure 2 was created by and is used with permission from Dr. Greg Gdowski, ©2019, All Rights Reserved.

You are now at one of the first major milestones in your journey. You have come to a fork in the road. This is when you will transition from a beginner-level reefer to an intermediate-level reefer. If you pick the wrong side at the fork in the road, your corals will stop growing and it's possible some of them will not thrive at all. Your addiction will force you to continue to add corals, amplifying the problem further, causing you greater frustration when nothing thrives.

Solutions to the problem of water parameter degradation. At this juncture, you really only have four potential solutions to the problem.

1. Fragment your corals and reduce the need for constituent elements.

2. Increase the amount of water changes or the frequency of water changes.

3. Start dosing constituent elements.

4. Migrate away from SPS or LPS corals to soft corals such as zoanthids or mushrooms, which don't use calcium and alkalinity.

Option #1 is akin to telling a smoker that they should quit. It’s hard to fragment corals that are not growing in the first place. In order to solve the problem, you will have to remove those fragments and put them in a different tank. Alternatively, you will have to stop buying new corals all together.

Option #2 is a solution based on manipulating your water change schedule. This solution works, but it should be thoughtfully executed based on chemical testing. Your first inclination will be to stay on your same schedule, but to increase the amount of water changed out (Figure 2B). Unfortunately, in doing so, you may have created two problems. 1) If your consumption rate is high, your water parameters may still decrease below ideal values before your next water change. 2) The water parameters will exhibit higher variability over time. Long-term success is all about stability. The best strategy, unfortunately, is to increase the frequency of water changes (Figure 2C). This strategy maintains values within an ideal range. In addition, it produces values that are higher on average that exhibit less variability over time.

How do you know when the solution is working? The only way to check to see if your water changes are working properly is through water testing. Test your water twice: 1) test it just before your water change, and 2) test it again about 2hrs after doing the water change to ensure that your new water has been thoroughly distributed.

A. If both tests yield low values, then you are in the scenario depicted in Figure 2A. This is by far the worst-case scenario, because your problem will only get worse until you remedy the situation. More frequent water changes are justified.

B. If only the first test is low, then you are in the scenario depicted in Figure 2B. This scenario is tolerable but is less than ideal. This likely means there are time periods when your corals are underperforming in growth and are not looking as healthy as they could. Similarly, more frequent water changes would be justified.

C. If first test is lower than the second test, but both are within the ideal range, then your water changes are working effectively as depicted in Figure 2C.

For me, if you haven’t figured it out already, this is where my true “hate” of water changes began. The use of water changes to correct this problem never gets better. You start off with water changes once/month. Then it's twice/month. Eventually, it becomes once/week. I think you get it.

More and more weight being lugged up the basement stairs. From my wife’s perspective, that meant more and more water spilled on the floor. From my perspective, that meant never building a much larger tank (ie. the second goal of every reefer) in a different room with a wood floor. In any case, for both of us, something had to change.

A number of years back a few reefers built some of the first DIY automatic water changers. Today, there are a number of automatic water changers on the market at reasonable costs (AutoAqua). The primary advantage of these systems is that they provide more stability and less variability in water parameters over time. This is accomplished by reducing the amplitude of the water change (red line) but doing it more frequency (perhaps every hour instead of every week) as in Figure 2C. It is a solution worth considering. The primary disadvantage is that two reservoirs have to be utilized to hold and maintain waste water and fresh salt water.

Option #3 is to start dosing constituent elements. This will be the topic of my next article. Once you head down this path and have mastered it, you are really halfway to a no-water-change solution. Indeed, it was the implementation of these options that gave me the confidence to go the whole distance in using a Balling method (Balling 2008) to altogether eliminate water changes in my current tank.

Option #4--self-explanatory.

Until next time,

Happy reefing!

Greg

What is Majchrzak status? It is when your local fish store asks you to answer their phone when they are overrun with business!

Table 1, adapted from the Public Aquarium Husbandry Series of the Royal Burgers' Zoo shows the general ranges of calcium and alkalinity in comparison to natural sea water (Borneman 2008).

screen-shot-2019-01-19-at-9-28-23-am-png.950173


References

AutoAqua. "Auto Water Changer plus automatic topoff system." from http://www.autoaqua.com.tw/en/sawc-200p.html.

Balling, H.-W., Janse, M., and Sondervan, P.J. (2008). Trace elements, functions, sinks and replenishment in reef aquaria. Advances in Coral Husbandry in Public Aquariums. . R. J. Leewis and M. Janse. Arnhem, the Netherlands, Burgers’ Zoo. 2: 143-156.

Borneman, E. (2008). Introduction to the husbandry of corals in aquariums: A review. Advances in Coral Husbandry in Public Aquariums. . R. J. Leewis and M. Janse. Arnhem, the Netherlands, Burgers’ Zoo. 2: 3-14.

Bulk Reef Supply. "Instant Ocean Reef Cystals Reef Salt." from https://www.bulkreefsupply.com/instant-ocean-reef-crystals-salt-mix.html.

ESV Aquarium Products. "B-Ionic Reef Keeping (BRK)." from http://www.esvco.com/b-ionicreg-reef-keeping.html.

Hunt, P. (2013). Marine Aquarium Basics, Part 1: Water and Salt Tropical Fish Hobbyist.

LiveAquaria. "Importance of Water Changes in Aquariums." from https://m.liveaquaria.com/article/181/?aid=181.

Timmons, M. (2011). "Is Reverse Osmosis Wasteful?". from https://www.uswatersystems.com/blog/2011/05/is-reverse-osmosis-wasteful/.

White, C. (2019). "Water Change FAQ." Reef2Reef.

https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/z...ty-or-is-it-just-hard-corals-sps-that.160534/

https://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/features/articles/the-balling-method

~~~~~~~~~~~

We encourage all our readers to join the Reef2Reef forum. It’s easy to register, free, and reefkeeping is much easier and more fun in a community of fellow aquarists. We pride ourselves on a warm and family-friendly forum where everyone is welcome. You will also find lots of contests and giveaways with our sponsors.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Author Profile: Greg Gdowski, Ph.D.

Greg has 20 years of aquarium experience, and he has been keeping reef aquariums for the past 10 years. A video of his current 90G appears at the bottom of this article. He and his wife are also both dog lovers and have two special-needs Vizslas at home.

Greg is also the Executive Director of the Center for Medical Technology and Innovation and Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at University of Rochester.
 

Seawitch

Water, water everywhere,
View Badges
Joined
Nov 3, 2018
Messages
1,740
Reaction score
4,422
Location
Vancouver Island
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Great article, Doc. I have a question. In your Table 1 at the end, why is the "Ideal" range for alkalinity so much higher than the alkalinity range in real seawater?
 
OP
OP
Greg Gdowski

Greg Gdowski

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
337
Reaction score
757
Location
Rochester, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Cynthia -- good question. The Boreman article states the ideal range is 2.5-4.5 meq/L (ie max of 12.7dKH) for a reef tank compared to seawater which has a high of 2.5meq/L (7dKH). A number of reefers, including Randy Holmes-Farley have suggested using 11 dKH as a high to prevent precipitation issues when dosing. That is why I have 11dKH in that figure.

But why is that good or ideal? It has been stated that some corals grow faster at higher alkalinity levels. Boreman cites another paper by Langdon on this topic. Indeed, FritzPRO manufactures a high-alkalinity reef salt that falls somewhere between 10-12 dKH.

That said, I think its an open question for mixed reef tanks like mine. I've contemplated doing a utilization experiment to determine the best alkalinity level for my tank (ie. what alkalinity level yields the largest consumption rate -- Figure 1A). My instincts tell me that it is around 9dKH based on casual observations.
 
OP
OP
Greg Gdowski

Greg Gdowski

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
337
Reaction score
757
Location
Rochester, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another remarkable reefer in Rochester, Ellery Wong, reminded me that water volume can also influence the consumption rate of alkalinity. For example, in my system I have a 90G display tank, 30 G sump, and 60G refugium. In a previous article, I showed that I had about 163G of total water volume. All of that water contains alkalinity and calcium. If I didn't have that refugium, there would be less available alkalinity and calcium for my corals in the display tank. The consumption rate would be a lot higher without that refugium.

When is this important? In smaller tanks like nanos without refugiums, that have even smaller sump volumes. In those circumstances, you are limited to the available alkalinity and calcium that exists within the small volume of your nano.
 

Seawitch

Water, water everywhere,
View Badges
Joined
Nov 3, 2018
Messages
1,740
Reaction score
4,422
Location
Vancouver Island
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another remarkable reefer in Rochester, Ellery Wong, reminded me that water volume can also influence the consumption rate of alkalinity. For example, in my system I have a 90G display tank, 30 G sump, and 60G refugium. In a previous article, I showed that I had about 163G of total water volume. All of that water contains alkalinity and calcium. If I didn't have that refugium, there would be less available alkalinity and calcium for my corals in the display tank. The consumption rate would be a lot higher without that refugium.

When is this important? In smaller tanks like nanos without refugiums, that have even smaller sump volumes. In those circumstances, you are limited to the available alkalinity and calcium that exists within the small volume of your nano.

You mean because the extra water volume provides extra alkalinity and calcium while the refugium and sump don’t use any?
 

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,725
Reaction score
86,757
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thank you very much for this well written article!
 

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
91,668
Reaction score
202,224
Location
Wisconsin -
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
The importance of replenishment is so essential, yet often overlooked. Absorption and evaporation play important roles in reduction of KH, Ca and many traces and needs to be addressed regularly for sustainment of many corals.
 

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
91,668
Reaction score
202,224
Location
Wisconsin -
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
OP
OP
Greg Gdowski

Greg Gdowski

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
337
Reaction score
757
Location
Rochester, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’d have to give your article “5-stars” for readability and informative value. :)

Thank you! I had to put this one together for the later dosing article to make any sense at all. I've got some good dosing data coming in that will really tie everything together.
 

MichaelClark55

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
277
Reaction score
228
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you! I had to put this one together for the later dosing article to make any sense at all. I've got some good dosing data coming in that will really tie everything together.
Awesome article waiting on the 2nd part. I am one of those on the fence doing 10% 1 x week
 

aircrane1

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
52
Reaction score
64
Location
Grants Pass, Oregon
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As a new reefer I am definately following this. Mid 90's I had a 70 gallon "reef", some fish and a few softies and LPS (no SPS since I ran VHO fluorescents). I got back in the hobby barely a month ago and I am so excited about all of the new information available that wasn't there before. I look forward to the possibility of minimal / no water changes in the future as my tank matures and I collect more corals your series of articles should help tremendously. Never had to dose in my previous reefer life, really didn't even know I may have needed to. It is all about the overall health and growth of the animals I am responsible for now. Thank you for the article and help. May I ask if you have any plans regarding the physical / mechanical / technical aspects of the dosing process? There is so much to absorb about this process (intentional pun).
 

Stanzo13

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
332
Reaction score
184
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Can I just throw in that I stopped doing water changes to rid my tank of Dino's and it worked (at least for now only about 2 weeks clear)
 
OP
OP
Greg Gdowski

Greg Gdowski

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
337
Reaction score
757
Location
Rochester, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As a new reefer I am definately following this. Mid 90's I had a 70 gallon "reef", some fish and a few softies and LPS (no SPS since I ran VHO fluorescents). I got back in the hobby barely a month ago and I am so excited about all of the new information available that wasn't there before. I look forward to the possibility of minimal / no water changes in the future as my tank matures and I collect more corals your series of articles should help tremendously. Never had to dose in my previous reefer life, really didn't even know I may have needed to. It is all about the overall health and growth of the animals I am responsible for now. Thank you for the article and help. May I ask if you have any plans regarding the physical / mechanical / technical aspects of the dosing process? There is so much to absorb about this process (intentional pun).

I'll put some technical aspects in the dosing article. I've been collecting some data on my tank to make the article more compelling. In the meantime, I have also been working on a lighting articles as well. I'm glad you found the article of interest. It makes me want to keep writing.
 

Idaho-reefer

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Messages
133
Reaction score
133
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I haven’t changed my water for over a year still running on the same from day one.

37FD2CA6-E4F5-4BDD-AC41-B9814CDDD667.jpeg
 

Rivus

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 18, 2018
Messages
89
Reaction score
73
Location
Blue Hill, Maine
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was just talking to the LFS owner, old school store in his house, that has been in the business for many decades. He has tanks running, some for 16 years, with no water changes, and no issues! I'm still doing 10%/wk, but not happy with algae/dinos.
 
OP
OP
Greg Gdowski

Greg Gdowski

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
337
Reaction score
757
Location
Rochester, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I haven’t changed my water for over a year still running on the same from day one.

37FD2CA6-E4F5-4BDD-AC41-B9814CDDD667.jpeg

I like the color of your green pocillopora damicornis far better than mine. I think my problem is related to extreme low nitrates and phosphates (something I'm working on). I'd be interested in knowing your Ca and Alk levels. I think corals can thrive in many different circumstances.

For example, I have that exact combo next to one another. My monti was about 1" by 3" when I bought it from a fellow reefer who was closing down his tank to move. He had it for some time and it hadn't done much. It retained its color. I figured I'd give it a try (otherwise he was going to pitch it).
He recently contacted me because he is restarting a new tank now that he has settled in. That coral is now about 7" in diameter and about 3" high. I looked up my first contact with that person -- that was 11 months ago.

I think the only real difference between the two of us was likely dosing and Ca and Alk levels. I wish I had done a chemical test on the water I brought home with that coral. Dosing is not all that hard when you need it .... on to the next article. I'll show you just how fast my tank drains and consumes alkalinity.

IMG_7951 copy.JPG
 
Back
Top