I am running a FOWLR setup with about 140 gal of actual working volume between my display tank and sump/refugium.
In my 'fuge I have a bunch of Chaeto with a Kessil A360 light on a reverse lighting cycle.
I'm worried my Chaeto is "too effective" ... I have essentially zero nitrates and phosphates, but my Chaeto gets a bunch of pale spots on it that make me think it is starving for nutrients.
I've read a few articles that suggest this may actually be quite common ... that Chaeto has such a fast growth cycle that it needs a lot of nutrients on a constant basis, and that once you bottom out the available nutrients the Chaeto begins to suffer.
I'd rather not start to add back nutrients to keep the Chaeto going strong. Instead, I'm thinking about changing to either Red Ogo or Pom Pom (both different forms of Gracilaria).
Does anyone else have this problem?
Would Gracilaria take up enough nutrients to maintain my water quality in the absence of Chaeto?
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
In my 'fuge I have a bunch of Chaeto with a Kessil A360 light on a reverse lighting cycle.
I'm worried my Chaeto is "too effective" ... I have essentially zero nitrates and phosphates, but my Chaeto gets a bunch of pale spots on it that make me think it is starving for nutrients.
I've read a few articles that suggest this may actually be quite common ... that Chaeto has such a fast growth cycle that it needs a lot of nutrients on a constant basis, and that once you bottom out the available nutrients the Chaeto begins to suffer.
I'd rather not start to add back nutrients to keep the Chaeto going strong. Instead, I'm thinking about changing to either Red Ogo or Pom Pom (both different forms of Gracilaria).
Does anyone else have this problem?
Would Gracilaria take up enough nutrients to maintain my water quality in the absence of Chaeto?
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.