Colorful Zoas do not have (or have very little) palytoxins

zoaprince

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
505
Reaction score
680
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've seen this posted constantly but no one ever posts any proof. Sorry but I am not a 60 year old who believes everything they read on the internet is true.

Can someone post some credible studies which showed that color zoanthids have no palytoxin?

I am not saying I AGREE or DISAGREE with this statement. I simply want to see a credible source. Thanks!
 

Oscar47f

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
905
Location
Miami, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

This one is not specifically saying that colored ones are more or less toxic but it does imply there are different levels of toxins within different species
 

Reefing_addiction

It’s my TANK and I want it NOW!
View Badges
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
11,269
Reaction score
39,609
Location
Westminster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is a good read though

 

xxkenny90xx

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 2, 2019
Messages
4,654
Reaction score
6,040
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Zoanthids (which is apparently refers to all corals of the Zoanthraria order) include the genus Palythoa, which is toxic as mentioned above, but no other Zoanthid genus has been shown to contain palytoxin.

Here's an excellent 2-part series by an esteemed zoologist discussing Zoa toxicity:


Palytoxin has only been found in Palytho spp. (spp is the abbreviation for plural species), some dinoflaggelates (Ostreopsis spp.) and some cyanobacteria (Trichodesmium spp.)

If you have more literature or examples, then please share and correct me.
 

Oscar47f

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
905
Location
Miami, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It’s all an assumption.
Not really an assumption they did prove in the previous article that one did not have the same concentration as another but they didn’t go through all the zoanthid species and they didn’t focus on color if that makes sense ? Lol I agree that a lot is still up in the air though
 
OP
OP
zoaprince

zoaprince

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
505
Reaction score
680
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not really an assumption they did prove in the previous article that one did not have the same concentration as another but they didn’t go through all the zoanthid species and they didn’t focus on color if that makes sense ? Lol I agree that a lot is still up in the air though
it is still an assumption because they only tested a few zoanthids/palys and no mention of color. Although the zoanthids tested showed no or "weak" palytoxin, they also tested Palys that had no or weak palytoxin. Actually only one of the Palys/Zoas they tested had palytoxin "Palythoa heliodiscus" The articles posted by @xxkenny90xx seem to actually be based on the study you posted. It even has the same images.

It seems there isn't sufficient data to say anything concrete, but if we take that single study as our bible, then only Palythoa heliodiscus contains harmful amounts of palytoxin. All other zoas/palys are OK.
 

littlebigreef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 25, 2016
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,968
Location
Batavia IL
Rating - 100%
12   0   0
I don’t believe pigmentation has any role in the amount of paly toxin present in any one strain. I have plenty of antidotal evidence that ‘size’ (relative to a healthy polyp in ‘normal’ par) and ‘species’ (generally agreed up group or class) are the best indicators. Strains like utter chaos, blue lagoons, sunny do’s, all the CAR morphs, have a greater capacity to squirt and spread juices simply because there’s more tissue than tightly growing polyps like bam bams or king Midas. That said, aside from juice in the eye or working with an open cut (I didn’t realize at the time) these don’t pose much of a threat.

When you start discussing true palys like captain America’s, beauty and the beast, capt Jerks you run a greater risk of seriously being injured. First, the tissue is noticeably different, thicker and more rigid- almost sponge like. Secondly these weep copious amounts of viscous ‘zoa juice’ when fragged. With these more sensitive people should probably wear masks because there is that possibility you could breath it in. We can also loop Texas Trash and generic ‘button polyps’ into that group. Those are the ones people need to be more conscientious about working with.

So, all things being equal I’m bored as hell with people freaking out about paly toxin. In most serious cases people (including a good buddy and shop owner) aspirated particulate that had been ground up (in his case unknowingly) or boiled off. To a lesser extant eye injuries and open cuts pose a much lower risk. Yes, some people are more sensitive to this stuff generally. But, as a guy that has cut 10’s of thousands of zoa and paly frags over the years most pose little risk. If I had to opine I’d say three factors always lead to this topic coming back up 1) the continued rise of people fragging and selling, 2) general expansion of the hobby 3) long term hobbyists deciding to remove grown-in patches of palys from their aquarium.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top