Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do (did) have books. I say did because I haven’t seen them in a LONG time and am not sure if I still have them. I just got back into this hobby in the last couple of years. I now rely more on the experiences of others than books. I guess that is close to science, but I’d suggest that experience is more trial and error than science where there is a hypothesis, study design, and quantitative analysis.So like many of you, I’ve been doing this for a long time. And I find the science behind it interesting and helpful but I’m not a numbers chaser. And certainly the consensus is “don’t chase numbers”! And numbers in our hobby often represent science. But as I share with friends about my successes in this beautiful hobby, I can’t help but feel that my success is often driven by chance or gut feeling that has worked for me in times past. And I go for it!
1. Do you have a “Reefing book” that you observed word for word?
2. Or do you have a 6th sense?
In my view it’s both, the assimilation of nutrients by heterotrophic bacteria is well studied and marketing as it’s a easy way to give someone that doesn’t know how to utilise their existing bacteria in their favour a impression that it’s some sort of magic in a bottle.I'm currently struggling with bottled heterotrophic bacteria. I just can't figure out if it is science or marketing.
My struggle is not the well studied and peer reviewed assimilation of nutrients by heterotopic bacteria... That's the science. It is if the living bacteria, touted to help my reef tank, could still exist in those bottles after being shipped across the world, in freezing cold and extreme heat, and after sitting on a store shelf or warehouse floor for months. I'm afraid that convincing us that that bacteria can live in that bottle is the marketing process in action.In my view it’s both, the assimilation of nutrients by heterotrophic bacteria is well studied and marketing as it’s a easy way to give someone that doesn’t know how to utilise their existing bacteria in their favour a impression that it’s some sort of magic in a bottle.
I see your point of view, you may be surprised that the main ingredients will survive the trip. even if all bacteria was to be lost during shipping, it would still be effective at doing its job.My struggle is not the well studied and peer reviewed assimilation of nutrients by heterotopic bacteria... That's the science. It is if the living bacteria, touted to help my reef tank, could still exist in those bottles after being shipped across the world, in freezing cold and extreme heat, and after sitting on a store shelf or warehouse floor for months. I'm afraid that convincing us that that bacteria can live in that bottle is the marketing process in action.
I hear ya. We should probably continue this discussion elsewhere though and let the thread continue on its original path.I see your point of view, you may be surprised that the main ingredients will survive the trip. even if all bacteria was to be lost during shipping, it would still be effective at doing its job.
The reason is because there is two forms of nutrients in the vessel, organic Carbon and phosphates. They only shipped with two nutrients for the bacteria to stay dormant and not assimilate the nutrients in the vessel.
Once it hits a tank those added nutrients will remove nutrient limitations and allow for bacteria to “clean the tank”.
Just shipping heterotrophic bacteria on its own would be bad for business as it wouldn’t work once it got to the end tank that may already be limited for the bacteria to work.
This is why I say it’s a bit of both science and marketing, marketing will always be favourable for a larger part of the saltwater community.