Good afternoon. I need some advice on what I need to do from this point forward. As a little background, I am running a 120-gallon reef tank that was upgraded from a 60 gallon back this past March. I did increase the amount of LR when I upgraded. Since I already had approximately 70 pounds of rock that was at least 5 years established, I added dry rock for the increase. I now have about 130 pounds of rock (estimate) with a 1.5" sandbed. Approximately 2 weeks ago my new baby PB Tang died of what I thought was Marine Velvet. It was introduced directly to the tank without a QT period or observation period. I know, I should have and knew better but didn't. Since his/her death, I have lost nearly all but 4 fish to Brooklynella. The dead fish are: 5-year-old Female WW clown, 2 yr old male Ocellaris, 1 young Banggai, 2 year old RG, & Approximately 4-year-old female Mandarin. Before I realized I had an issue in the tank, the Mandarin was the first to die. I honestly assumed it was her age since they are known to have a much shorter lifespan in captivity so I replaced her with a young male Mandarin that died 1 week after adding. Prior to his death, I lost the baby PB and thought it was Velvet. I treated the DT with Rubby Reef Rally Pro for 3 days at 1oz/ 20g to offer relief till I could catch everyone and QT in copper. Only was able to catch the clowns and a lawnmower blenny. Once I got them in copper, I found out that it was actually Brooklynella thanks to Humblefish's web page. I set up a second QT with MetroPlex and moved them but not before I lost my male clown. Two days into the new QT and I lost my female clown. The only survivors are the one's I could not catch in the DT. They are: 1Domino Damsel, 1 elderly female Banggai, YWG, and the Lawnmower that I moved back to the DT from the QT. These guys are eating really well and have shown zero signs of infection!
Here is the conflict. According to my reading and research, Brooklynella's life cycle is solely on the fish. It does not have a life cycle like ich or velvet. Is it reasonable to think that Brook would not live in the DT due to the lifecycle? Is it possible that the survivors are resistant/immune to it? Is it possible to ever add new fish again considering that the survivors could be carriers? Without having to completely break down the tank and remove rock and corals, there is no way to get the survivors out and I really don't want to disturb the corals and nems if I don't have to. Reading through Lasse's and Paul B's method and am intrigued. I would love to be able to implement this but no clue where to go from here. There HAS to be a way that I can rebuild my livestock without tearing apart my tank to allow a fallow period. Thank you in advance for the responses. If anyone needs more tank info such as parameters, I will be glad to give the information.
Here is the conflict. According to my reading and research, Brooklynella's life cycle is solely on the fish. It does not have a life cycle like ich or velvet. Is it reasonable to think that Brook would not live in the DT due to the lifecycle? Is it possible that the survivors are resistant/immune to it? Is it possible to ever add new fish again considering that the survivors could be carriers? Without having to completely break down the tank and remove rock and corals, there is no way to get the survivors out and I really don't want to disturb the corals and nems if I don't have to. Reading through Lasse's and Paul B's method and am intrigued. I would love to be able to implement this but no clue where to go from here. There HAS to be a way that I can rebuild my livestock without tearing apart my tank to allow a fallow period. Thank you in advance for the responses. If anyone needs more tank info such as parameters, I will be glad to give the information.