Help Needed for 150 gal Tall 48" x 24" x 30"

jkruer01

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Try to ignore the lighting and GHA ...smh...

My tank is about 2-3 months old. It is a 150 gal Tall so it is 4' x 2' x 30" tall. Currently the rock I have is just stacked in there, it isn't glued or anything. I tried using the rule of 1/3rds but I don't think it has turned out very well.

The challenges I have are:

1) The tank is tall but not very long so it is difficult to fill the vertical space.
2) There isn't a lot of places to put corals
3) It just isn't very visually interesting.

I like all of the caves, nooks, and crannies. I don't like the top half at all. I really want to use some of the shelf rock to create some ledges or cliffs that jut out but I'm not really sure how to accomplish that.

The base of my rock work is 3 or 4 very large rocks. I'm not sure if that is good or bad.

My main goal are:
1) Create something more visually interesting
2) Create more space to place corals
3) Keep the caves for fish and shrimp
IMG_20180617_150113.jpg
IMG_20180617_150133.jpg
IMG_20180617_150121.jpg
IMG_20180617_150157.jpg


Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
 

Fishfinder

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
3,586
Reaction score
4,477
Location
Melbourne, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My personal opinion on rock is that it looks more natural when it is all the same type of rock. I imagine if you built and arch out of rubble and replaced that branch it would look much better.
 
OP
OP
jkruer01

jkruer01

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My personal opinion on rock is that it looks more natural when it is all the same type of rock. I imagine if you built and arch out of rubble and replaced that branch it would look much better.

I agree. I made some changes and I think I like it better. At least a little bit.

IMG_20180617_173852.jpg
IMG_20180617_173912.jpg
IMG_20180617_173901.jpg
IMG_20180617_173921.jpg
 

Fishfinder

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
3,586
Reaction score
4,477
Location
Melbourne, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've also found that smaller rocks are better. I smashed my bigger rocks into smaller pieces. It allows for more interesting pieces to choose from and also more options when you fit them all together. If you have one big rock it's just a rock, but if you fit together 5-6 smaller rocks you can make a nicer shape
 
OP
OP
jkruer01

jkruer01

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've also found that smaller rocks are better. I smashed my bigger rocks into smaller pieces. It allows for more interesting pieces to choose from and also more options when you fit them all together. If you have one big rock it's just a rock, but if you fit together 5-6 smaller rocks you can make a nicer shape
Thanks! I was kind of thinking about the same thing.
 

Jack Ravensbergen

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 17, 2016
Messages
446
Reaction score
1,456
Location
Amsterdam Holland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think that if you would splitt the biggest rock on the right side below , and place it back with a 2.5" space between them it will make a big difference.
My tank has simular sizes , and i had the same problems , so i used smaller rocks.
Grtz Jack

 
Last edited:

Caring for your picky eaters: What do you feed your finicky fish?

  • Live foods

    Votes: 20 31.3%
  • Frozen meaty foods

    Votes: 52 81.3%
  • Soft pellets

    Votes: 10 15.6%
  • Masstick (or comparable)

    Votes: 7 10.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.7%
Back
Top