High Silicon in RODI Water

Poi Dog

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
Location
So. Cali.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello, looking for some help. I received my ATI ICP test back and it showed that my RODI water had high Silicon 44.40 ug/l versus a reference of 0. My handheld TDS shows 0. The sample was taken from a holding container that is a "food safe" dog food container. Any idea how this could happen and its effect on coral? I am having some issues with my SPS lately. The odd thing is my tanks Silicon is 74.72 ug/l versus the reference of 109.7 ug/l, under the reference.
 

minus9

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 13, 2017
Messages
5,407
Reaction score
6,419
Location
Los Angeles (SFV)
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
You can have silicate in your RO and still show zero tds. How many stages is your unit? Carbon blocks? DI resin(s)? Having multiple DI stages will help remove them.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,154
Reaction score
63,502
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Silicate is one of the easiest ions to get past a DI, especially if it is starting to deplete.

That said, do you have a significant problem with diatoms?

Don't let the number alone scare you. That's a huge issue with getting ICP tests. There's no reason to be concerned with it unless you have problem diatoms. I dosed way more than this to my tank intentionally.

If you use that water to replace 1% of the tank volume each day to replace evaporation, you are adding 0.4 ppb silicon each day.

When i dosed silicate, I typically dosed about 200 ppb once a week or so.
 
Last edited:

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,532
Reaction score
10,071
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
RODI water had high Silicon 44.40 ug/l versus a reference of 0. My handheld TDS shows 0. ...
Any idea how this could happen and its effect on coral? I am having some issues with my SPS lately. The odd thing is my tanks Silicon is 74.72 ug/l versus the reference of 109.7 ug/l, under the reference.
0.04ppm Si may be "high" for RODI water, but it's not high for a system.
Hence the 0.11ppm Si "reference level" for tank water.
At those levels you might get some slight diatom growth but nothing that would cause coral issues.
 

piranhaman00

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
4,875
Reaction score
4,828
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
TDS meters report ppm, 44.40 ppb will not be measured. I would not worry regardless.
 
OP
OP
P

Poi Dog

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
Location
So. Cali.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you all for your responses, I appreciate your time.

@minus9 – My RODI has 1 sediment, 2 chloramine busters, 1 0.5 micron carbon block and 2 DI stages. All have recently been changed/refilled. I’m just surprised that anything has gotten through. I suspected a chloramine issue hence the focus on the chloramine busters. I’m thinking of sending a sample in directly from the unit since the tested sample came from the storage container. Although the storage container is only 3 gallons and is frequently refilled.

@Randy Holmes-Farley & @taricha – no diatom issues (knock on wood). I’m pretty good with water changes (30g every other week, total tank volume of ~150g). I also run a UV sterilizer.

The ICP results from the tank showed a high level of Barium (68.82 ug/l vs. reference of 10.97 ug/l) and tin (15.34 ug/l vs. reference of 0.55 ug/l). Do you guys think these levels would impact SPS? All of the parameters (Alk, CA, PO4, NO3, Mg, salinity) are tested weekly and are within normal levels. Although phosphorus tested low (2.26ug/l vs. reference of 16.46 ug/l), just started dosing Seachem Flourish.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,532
Reaction score
10,071
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That is a low P reading. If you have a good PO4 tester - does it agree? If not, I'd trust that over what they find in your water after several days of shipping, for something as reactive as PO4.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,154
Reaction score
63,502
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The ICP results from the tank showed a high level of Barium (68.82 ug/l vs. reference of 10.97 ug/l) and tin (15.34 ug/l vs. reference of 0.55 ug/l). Do you guys think these levels would impact SPS? All of the parameters (Alk, CA, PO4, NO3, Mg, salinity) are tested weekly and are within normal levels. Although phosphorus tested low (2.26ug/l vs. reference of 16.46 ug/l), just started dosing Seachem Flourish.

I don't think those levels of barium or tin are concerning unless you already perceive a problem.

Tin is especially hard to judge as there are many different forms with different toxicity, but I've not seen folks have issues at that level.
 
OP
OP
P

Poi Dog

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
Location
So. Cali.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@taricha I have an old school hanna 93713 of which I get readings between 0.02 mg/l - 0.03 mg/l. The ICP result for phosphate was 0.01 mg/l versus 0.05 mg/l benchmark. So, it seems to be correct. I’m not sure how to test phosphorus or it’s relationship to phosphate.

@Randy Holmes-Farley thank you for the response. Still on the search for what is bothering my SPS. I don’t see anything else on the ICP that would be concerning, which is maddening.
 

Attachments

  • Analyse85440.pdf
    129.3 KB · Views: 73

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,532
Reaction score
10,071
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
okay, so an actual quite low PO4 reading. I'd consider moving into recommended range if you don't like how the tank livestock is looking/behaving.
 

Being sticky and staying connected: Have you used any reef-safe glue?

  • I have used reef safe glue.

    Votes: 135 88.2%
  • I haven’t used reef safe glue, but plan to in the future.

    Votes: 9 5.9%
  • I have no interest in using reef safe glue.

    Votes: 6 3.9%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 2.0%
Back
Top