How to determine PAR drop off for height above water level

OP
OP
pompeyjohn

pompeyjohn

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
262
Reaction score
119
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is for a six inch deep zoa frag tank. Frags are about 3 inches below surface. Mounting height needs to be up high, so I am trying to work out the right intensity to get ~200. I have a request in for a PAR meter, but it is going to be a week or two before it arrives.
 

Breadman03

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
2,249
Reaction score
2,022
Location
Luzerne County, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Inverse Square Law is what you're looking for. I don't know how accurate this calculator is, but I imagine it can at least get you into the ballpark. Also note that your linked PAR estimator only includes up to G3 Pro.

 
OP
OP
pompeyjohn

pompeyjohn

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
262
Reaction score
119
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you!

I have a G3, so fingers crossed.

At 8" AWL with the light at 100% the calculator suggests 968 PAR for 3" depth. Using that inverse square calculator the value for 20' high is 154.88. That seems really low, but I guess that is a lot of air for the light to dissipate through.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,596
Reaction score
3,445
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all,

There is a nifty radion calculator here: https://www.aquaticlog.com/radion

Unfortunately though that is calculated for 8" above water level, and my lights are 20" above the water level.

Is there a mathematical formular that I can use?

Thanks in advance
The inverse sq law doesn' t work well for tanks due to refraction and reflection.
Secondly if the light doesn't get into the tank all is just lost regardless.
Gen 3's had a choice of lenses. Assuming you have the " normal" lens at 80 degrees your spot size is 33.5".
So you can figure out the water surface pattern and if a lot of light is lost.
Easier to just see the light output at 2O" on a large piece of paper with the tank outline drawn in it . Any light outside is wasted inverse sq law or not.

Ideally one wants 1OO% on the water surface.
In your case mire like at the frag level.
So what. 29" plus 3" to frag level?
@ 23" spot size is almost 40".

If you look closely at the radion calculator you'll see it doesn' t adhere to the unverse sq rule
2x the distance 1/4 the power.
At 8+1 (9 inches ) 1271 par
At 8 +10 (18 inches or 2x9) 684
1/2 the par not 1/4.....
At 8 + 28" (36 or 2 x 18) 198 par. Though now 3.4 less 684/198.
Point is the inv sq doesn't work well.

Might as well just reverse the calculator assuming you aren' t spilling a ton of light outside the tank.

Try 485... So globally dim to say 50% all channels on full though.

As good of guess as any..
par-jpg.300002
 

High pressure shells: Do you look for signs of stress in the invertebrates in your reef tank?

  • I regularly look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 29 31.2%
  • I occasionally look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 23 24.7%
  • I rarely look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 18 19.4%
  • I never look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 23 24.7%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top