I have no idea what my salinity truly is. Please help.

OP
OP
MuscleBobBuffPants

MuscleBobBuffPants

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
128
Reaction score
130
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Testing a refractometer with rodi tells you almost nothing. They can be off significantly at 35ppt and still read 0 at 0 (or read zero at 10 PPT). Calibration solution is like $8 for a big bottle.


Refractometers get used for things that need way more precision than a reef tank does. Calibrate it (at 35 PPT!)regularly. Use it. Don't worry too much.

I guess I should just stop using the Hannah checkers then. focus on consistent 35 ppt with the refractometer
 

Cmooreinor

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
194
Reaction score
187
Location
Seattle Washington
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I guess I should just stop using the Hannah checkers then. focus on consistent 35 ppt with the refractometer
So I am dealing with this as well.... my Hannah is showing right at 35ppt.... refractometer closer to 38ppt. And that is calibrated with solution refractometer. Not sure what to trust...... I am guessing the solution calibrated refractometer....
 

Crashnt24

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
582
Reaction score
712
Location
Denver, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use the Milwaukee digital refractometer. It pretty much was spot on with my old swing arm hydrometer. So I just stick with one instrument and keep consistency. As long as your average for all your testing methods aren't at dangerous levels, pick one and stick with it. Good luck!
 

Rjukan

Day Dreamer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
2,745
Location
Staten Island
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm curious, have any of you used your testers to check your RODI water at the same time? I know it's all about the calibration fluid, but just to see if you get 0.0 for RODI...
 

Pistondog

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
5,315
Reaction score
9,450
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just stating the obvious, all the hannas are colorimeters and thus subject to inaccuracy if dirty. We must all dry the vials before insertion, even for the zeroing 'C2' step.
Otherwise the color sensor may be inaccurate.
 

Pistondog

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
5,315
Reaction score
9,450
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use the Milwaukee digital refractometer. It pretty much was spot on with my old swing arm hydrometer. So I just stick with one instrument and keep consistency. As long as your average for all your testing methods aren't at dangerous levels, pick one and stick with it. Good luck!
The Milwaukees are very convenient. Do you zero yours with distilled water regularly? Mine was off, so zero.
Do you find it accurate over wide ambient, say 70 to 90. Thats where I ran into problems
 

Crashnt24

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
582
Reaction score
712
Location
Denver, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Milwaukees are very convenient. Do you zero yours with distilled water regularly? Mine was off, so zero.
Do you find it accurate over wide ambient, say 70 to 90. Thats where I ran into problems

I zero mine before every single test. Also, I let the liquid sit in the well for 15 seconds before pressing "read". That way it has time to adjust the temp. I find it very accurate after taking those steps.
 

92Miata

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2020
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
2,485
Location
Richmond, VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm curious, have any of you used your testers to check your RODI water at the same time? I know it's all about the calibration fluid, but just to see if you get 0.0 for RODI...
Getting 0 testing RODI tells you nothing positive about the meter. A meter can be 0 at 0 and off by 20 PPT at 35ppt.

Calibration at 0 almost always makes your meter less accurate at 35 ppt
 

Rjukan

Day Dreamer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
2,745
Location
Staten Island
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Getting 0 testing RODI tells you nothing positive about the meter. A meter can be 0 at 0 and off by 20 PPT at 35ppt.

Calibration at 0 almost always makes your meter less accurate at 35 ppt

I never said calibration to 0 RODI...

I also don't agree that checking RODI after using a calibration fluid to set a meter tells you nothing. I like to see a baseline check to another known value before testing the SW to see the tester working properly.
 

92Miata

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2020
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
2,485
Location
Richmond, VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I never said calibration to 0 RODI...

I also don't agree that checking RODI after using a calibration fluid to set a meter tells you nothing. I like to see a baseline check to another known value before testing the SW to see the tester working properly.
Again, it doesn't give you any sort of baseline. Showing 0 on RODI doesn't tell you that the meter is working correctly, and matching up on one known value doesn't tell you anything about other values. "Broken clock" and all.


I've seen crappy refractometers read 0 on RODI and read 1.050 on 1.026 reference solution. 0-at-0 is utterly meaningless. It doesn't tell you that the slope is right, and it doesn't tell you that the offset is right. It's false security.

Spend the $5 and buy a bottle of reference solution. Or use a gram scale and make some.

RODI can tell you nothing useful about your refractometer. It's like saying "my speedometer is accurate because it reads 0 when the car is parked"
 

Rock solid aquascape: Does the weight of the rocks in your aquascape matter?

  • The weight of the rocks is a key factor.

    Votes: 10 8.7%
  • The weight of the rocks is one of many factors.

    Votes: 42 36.5%
  • The weight of the rocks is a minor factor.

    Votes: 35 30.4%
  • The weight of the rocks is not a factor.

    Votes: 27 23.5%
  • Other.

    Votes: 1 0.9%
Back
Top