- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
- Messages
- 227
- Reaction score
- 165
It's interested that the ratios are very close, except for Fe (21 times difference) and Cr (2.3 times difference). The rest can be attributed to measurement inaccuracies. However, what I don't understand, is why there is 1291 times (based on Zinc data) difference in absolute values? According ro Miami's data, there must be 103.3x15=1550 ppm Zn in the undiluted solution, whereas Hans Werner reported 1.2 mg/l of Zn. for the same liquid. Or, did he report the resultant increase of concentrations in the tank after adding the recommended dose?I took the recipe posted here by Hans, and the ICP results in the first post, and scaled both of them by the Zn result. (ICP does well at Zn, and the concentration of Zn tested was well in the comfort zone of ICP). It gives a very satisfying result.
![]()
The tested values are almost the exact ratios as the concentrations posted by Hans.
Except anything with more than a few ppb of Fe gets almost totally lost on the way to ICP (as @Dan_P @Rick Mathew and I have talked about before). Possible something else co-precipitated with the Fe, but looks like that had minimal effect on the results.
Nice job @Miami Reef I'm confortable with both your results and Hans stated recipe.