Lowest cost and easiest way to eliminate green hair, bubble, turf and slime algae from your aquarium

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Would it not be easier to get your nutrients under control? Overfeeding phosphates etc. are main causes of algae growth. They can be kept in check with proper care.

This is the same thing that goes through my head every time I get a thread update and I see the thread title. Heheh. Conservative thinking like this will get you nowhere!! :nono:

I stock my tanks so that I can feed all I want and still don't have problems. (Dang...there goes my secret!)

In seriousness, I do think the algae scrubber is both a novel, and worthy, approach to "do something" about out-of-control nutrients for all those systems out there which are overstocked. (Almost everyone.) More interesting than carbon dosing or the last 10 GFO reactors I've seen... ;)

-Matt
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Advanced Aquarist Feature Article for December 2013: Coral Feeding: An Overview
Feature Article: Coral Feeding: An Overview ? Advanced Aquarist | Aquarist Magazine and Blog


The picture in the article shows that in the 1000 litre test tank:

98% of the food particles go to the skimmer when there are 2 coral colonies
71% of the food particles go to the skimmer when there are 40 coral colonies
92% of the food particles go to the skimmer when there are 2 coral colonies, when skimming is cut in half
55% of the food particles go to the skimmer when there are 40 coral colonies, when skimming is cut in half


"This trade-off between food availability and water quality can be circumvented by using plankton-saving filtration systems, which include [...] algal turf scrubbers"

"Corals are able to feed on a wide range of particulate organic matter, which includes live organisms and their residues and excrements (detritus)."

"...bacteria [...] can be a major source of nitrogen."

"...when dry fish feeds or phytoplankton cultures are added to an aquarium, a part of this quickly ends up in the collection cup of the skimmer.

"...mechanical filters (which can include biofilters and sand filters) result in a significant waste of food."

"Detritus is a collective term for organic particles that arise from faeces, leftover food and decaying organisms. Detrital matter is common on coral reefs and in the aquarium, and slowly settles on the bottom as sediment. This sediment contains bacteria, protozoa, microscopic invertebrates, microalgae and organic material. These sedimentary sources can all serve as coral nutrients when suspended, especially for species growing in turbid waters. Experiments have revealed that many scleractinian corals can ingest and assimilate detritus which is trapped in coral mucus. Although stony corals may ingest detritus when it is available, several gorgonians have been found to primarily feed on suspended detritus."

"Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is an important food source for many corals. [...] scleractinian corals take up dissolved glucose from the water. More ecologically relevant, corals can also absorb amino acids and urea from the seawater"
 

Tomoko Schum

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
321
Location
Madison, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are the airline on the project box of the floating type for water movement? Why are you using gravels? Can you line the box with the plastic mesh instead?
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The airline create the bubbles that rub the strings and textures. It' the air/water interface of each bubble that causes algae to grow; without the bubbles there would be no growth. And the stings/textures give the algae a strong place to attach to so they can be blasted with the bubbles.

Gravel (we use pure white quartz rock) give the algae the same surface to attach to that they have on reefs; plus the white reflects the most light. You could use screen, but it would not be as good of an attachment, and would be even more difficult to glue in.
 

Tomoko Schum

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
321
Location
Madison, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The airline create the bubbles that rub the strings and textures. It' the air/water interface of each bubble that causes algae to grow; without the bubbles there would be no growth. And the stings/textures give the algae a strong place to attach to so they can be blasted with the bubbles.

I see. I can imagine that a layer of air trapped between the gravel/algae and the top cover with LED light, creating an air/water interface. If you don't use LED and opt to use a CFL, doen't the air bubbles just go straight up into the air space above, leaving algae mostly or partly submersed ? Of course, algae would be partly exposed to the air above and CO2 in the air...
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The air/water interface is in the bubble:

fig4.jpg





But yes, the air goes right up through the growth.
 

Tomoko Schum

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
321
Location
Madison, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Algae appear to grow on the nylon strings and on white gravels in your picture. Are the air bubbles reaching gravel surfaces as well? If so, how? You only have two air holes through the project box.
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The bubbles completely fill the compartment, rubbing everthing. I posted a video before which showed the grow and harvesting over several weeks, but I think it got removed.
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Nutrient Export

What do all algae (and cyano too) need to survive? Nutrients. What are nutrients? Ammonia/ammonium, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate and urea are the major ones. Which ones cause most of the algae in your tank? These same ones. Why can't you just remove these nutrients and eliminate all the algae in your tank? Because these nutrients are the result of the animals you keep.

So how do your animals "make" these nutrients? Well a large part the nutrients come from pee (urea). Pee is very high in urea and ammonia, and these are a favorite food of algae and some bacteria. This is why your glass will always need cleaning; because the pee hits the glass before anything else, and algae on the glass consume the ammonia and urea immediately (using photosynthesis) and grow more. In the ocean and lakes, phytoplankton consume the ammonia and urea in open water, and seaweed consume it in shallow areas, but in a tank you don't have enough space or water volume for this, and, your other filters or animals often remove or kill the phytoplankton or seaweed anyway. So, the nutrients stay in your tank.

Then the ammonia/ammonium hits your rocks, and the periphyton on them consumes more ammonia and urea. Periphyton is both algae and animals, and is the reason your rocks change color after a few weeks. Then the ammonia goes inside the rock, or hits your sand, and bacteria there convert it into nitrite and nitrate. However, the nutrients are still in your tank.

Also let's not forget phosphate, which comes from solid organic food particles. When these particles are eaten by microbes and clean up crew, the organic phosphorus in them is converted into phosphate. However, the nutrients are still in your tank.

So whenever you have algae "problems", you simply have not exported enough nutrients compared to how much you have been feeding (note: live rock can absorb phosphate for up to a year, making it seem like there was never a problem. Then, there is a problem).

So just increase your nutrient exports; building a scrubber would be ideal for this. You could also reduce feeding, and this has the same effect, but it's certainly not fun when you want to feed your animals :)
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Shade cloth:

All new scrubbers which use white growth surfaces should have a black cloth placed over the LEDs for the first week or two. Because the all-white interior reflects so much light, when it is new the light levels are way above the highest amount that can grow anything. Once growth starts, the white is covered with growth and the total light levels drop, and the cloth can be removed. Any cloth, stocking, or t-shirt can work; just don't melt the cloth with hot LEDs :)

This covering of the lights can be done by anyone, on any scrubber, even waterfalls. Waterfalls use plastic canvas which has more holes than material, and they are not in white compartments, so the light levels when new are not that high. But it still might help if a new screen stays completely empty.

The reason for a white texture and strings, of course, is too allow more light to reach the base of the growth that does the attaching to the textures. As the growth gets thicker, the bottom layers will almost be in darkness, so the white surface doubles the light there by reflecting instead of absorbing the light.
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"This is one weeks growth, I'm pulling out a lot more turf now it's certainly got a hold on the ribbons and the textured walls of the box. I tested phosphates a couple of days ago on the Hanna checker and it was reading 0. I did the test again because I've never had a 0 reading on this tank." -- Blinkyfish on the UR site:

attachment.php
 
OP
OP
SantaMonica

SantaMonica

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
750
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Scrubbers compared to refugiums

If you are starting a new tank, then the obvious difference is that a scrubber gives you the option of not having a fuge at all because an upflow scrubber can be placed on top of, in, or behind, the display. There are other uses for a sump/fuge of course, but we'll only cover the filtration concerns here.

A not-so-obvious difference is that a scrubber, if run together with a fuge with macros, will kill the macros even though the macros are much larger. This is because the scrubber thinks the macros are nuisance algae. Some people do run both together without killing the macros, but this is just because their scrubber is not strong enough, and actually the macros might even be slowing down the scrubber because the scrubber thinks it has to remove the macros, along with the nutrients in the water and the nuisance algae in the display. However if this works for them, good.

But assuming you have to decide on either a sump/fuge or a scrubber (not both)...

o Filtration with algae is proportional photosynthesis, which is proportional to Light X Air Water Turbulence Flow X Attachment. Meaning, stronger light grows more algae; stronger air/water interface turbulence grows more algae; and stronger attachment lets more algae grow without it detaching and floating away. A scrubber is thus designed to maximize Light, Flow, and Attachment.

o The main problem with macros in a refugium is the self-shading that the macros do. Any part of the macro which is not directly in front of the light at any moment is not filtering. And any macro inside of a "ball" of macro (like chaeto) is self-shaded all the time. Only the surface macro that is directly in front of the light is doing any real filtering. A scrubber is designed to have all the algae in front of the light at all times. Rotating the macro does not solve the problem, because the time that the macro is rotated away from the light is time that the macro is not filtering. This is why it takes a much larger size of chaeto to do the same filtering as a scrubber.

o Self-flow-blocking is another problem of macros in a refugium, for the same reason as light-blocking. And the thicker the "ball" of macro, the worse the flow-blocking.

o Particle trapping is another result of a ball of macro. These particles need to cycle back around to feed the corals, but instead they get trapped in the macro and they rot, and in doing so they block even more flow and light.

o With a scrubber, there is very little water standing in the way of the light. Also, the light is (or should be) very close to the scrubber... 4 inches (10cm) or less. The power of light varies with the inverse square of the distance, so going from 8" to 4" actually gives you 4X the power, not 2X. And the nutrient removal power of algae is proportional to the power of the light, because it's the photosynthesis that is doing the filtering.

o Rapid flow across the algae in a scrubber gives more delivery of nutrients, compared to the slow moving water in a fuge. Filtering is proportion to nutrient flow.

o The turbulence of water moving over the sections of algae in a scrubber help to remove the boundary layer of water around the algae. This boundary layer slows the transfer of metabolites in and out of the algae. There is no turbulence in a fuge (if there were, you'd have waves and bubbles). The interface between the air and water is what provides the most turbulence and boundary layer removal; there is no air/water interface in macros.

o Scrubbers do not let food particles settle like a refugium does; most particles flow right out of the scrubber.

o Scrubbers do not (if cleaned properly) release algal strands into display, like chaeto does.

o Scrubbers do not go sexual, like caulerpa can.

o Scrubbers do grow lots of pods; more than was previously thought, especially if not cleaned with freshwater.

o Scrubber don't, obviously, provide a place for snails and crabs, etc.

However, if you already have a sump with an empty compartment, and you don't mind using all of it and putting a light over it, then maybe it's easier and cheaper to try macros first.
 

CC13

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
779
Location
Toronto, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Anyone have any new and improved ideas or DIY?

Might give a scrubber a try for my large tank and I’m looking for ideas.
 

g6gang

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2014
Messages
272
Reaction score
25
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lowest cost and easiest way to eliminate green hair, bubble, turf and slime algae from your aquarium (hopefully permanently).

This new version is much easier to build than the versions you may have seen before; it has never been posted before 2012. It works in both freshwater and saltwater.

If you are like most aquatic hobbyists, nuisance algae is an ongoing problem. You try to feed your livestock, and the next thing you know, you get algae. You've already tried many fixes; some work but are expensive; some kind of work but you're not sure; and some just don't work at all.

Think about what is happening: Your aquarium is accumulating nutrients (nitrate and phosphate) because of the food you feed. Algae eat nitrate and phosphate to grow, so the algae are having a great time growing in your water because they are eating all your nutrients! What to do?

Well think about this: In order to grow, algae must be provided with nitrate and phosphate. So why can't you just use the algae to consume all the nitrate and phosphate? The answer: You can! How? With a simple device you build called an Upflow Algae Scrubber. It's simple, cheap, and you can make a small one in just a few minutes with parts you probably already have. I'll be posting more complex versions later, but here are some pics of the most basic design that you can use for testing:

(will be updated periodically)
Post1.jpg





An "algae scrubber" is a simple filter that actually grows algae in the filter, so that the algae do not grow in other parts of your aquarium. Simply put, the conditions for algae growth inside the filter are better than the conditions in the rest of your aquarium; thus the algae grow in the filter instead of your aquarium, and then you just remove the algae from the filter and throw the algae away. But in order for the algae to grow in the filter, the algae need to consume nitrate and phosphate; so guess where the nitrate and phosphate come from? Your water!

If you stop and think about it, algae always grow in certain spots, and not in others. This is because some of the three growing conditions (light, flow, nutrients) are better in some parts of your water than they are in others. An "upflow algae scrubber" simply optimizes these conditions, and does so at a place where the algae can be easily removed and thrown away. And once the nitrate and phosphate have been removed from your water, all other nuisance algae such as green hair, bubble, turf and slime, will have a hard time staying alive.

So where have these filters been all this time, and why haven't you heard of them if they work so well? Well the original waterfall version (the Mega Powerful thread posted in August 2008) was hard to build, and was not really for sale anywhere; so unless you liked to build things from scratch, you had no choice but to buy some other kind of filter. All the filter really needed to do was to create good growing conditions (light, flow, nutrients) for the algae, by flowing the water across a piece of rough material, so that the algae would grow on the material instead of somewhere else in the aquarium. The waterfall algae scrubber did grow lots of algae in the filter, and it removed lots of algae from aquariums: Over 1,000 people built their own waterfall algae scrubbers, and reported their results on various forums during a 4 year period; almost all of them wiped out their nuisance algae within 8 weeks, and many did so in 4 weeks. And on other forums that I never posted on, an estimated 10,000 people built their own waterfall algae scrubbers with similar results.

A little over a year ago in April 2011, another idea came along: Instead of letting the water flow down a screen like a waterfall, how about you let the water flow up the screen using air bubbles? Why? Because as good as waterfall algae scrubbers are, they still need a place for the water to drain "down" to. This means that you need to have a sump below the aquarium, or you need to have the scrubber up above the aquarium. This is not easy, and is very difficult for a nano aquarium which usually has no sump below it, and no room above it. Also, the waterfall version requires it to be out of the water (in the air), which takes up extra space. The new "upflow" version, however, can be placed inside the aquarium, so that it takes up no extra space at all, and it needs no external plumbing or water pumps at all. Only air bubbles.

The Upflow Algae Scrubber (UAS) provides the best growing conditions for algae in your tank: Air bubbles provide rapid turbulent flow; Strong lighting provides the light; and the nutrients that are already in your water provide the nitrate and phosphate. All that's needed is a place for the algae to attach to, and that is provided by the roughed-up plastic screen. Thus the algae start growing on the screen because the flow and lighting are stronger there than they are in the rest of your aquarium; nitrate and phosphate are consumed in the process. This causes algae to start disappearing from your aquarium and start re-appearing on the scrubber screen, so that you can throw the algae away every week or two.

The most basic way to set up an Upflow Algae Scrubber, especially in small aquariums, is just to put some air bubbles beneath a vertical screen. If inside an aquarium, you just put a light on the outside of the glass, so that it shines inside to the screen. And if you want better performance (which means better filtering), just add a reflector to give the screen some light on both sides. The screen is best made with 7-mesh cross stitch plastic canvas that you get at sewing or craft stores, or online. Also, don't forget to rough up the screen with a sharp object like a hole saw; the screen should be so rough that the screen holes are almost filled in with all the little pieces of plastic that you roughed up.

One thing to remember is that an Upflow Algae Scrubber (or any algae scrubber) will not cause more algae to grow in your aquarium. Instead, the algae will disappear from your aquarium, and will start to grow on the scrubber screen instead. You then just remove the screen and scrape the algae off. And here's a surprise: Watch out for your fish or snails eating your filter! There's nothing tastier than live green algae, so your fish or snails may keep your screen from getting very thick. The simple solution is to just put some mesh or netting around it.

There are a couple of requirements that have been learned since August 2008 which will get you started quicker. The size of the Upflow Algae Scrubber that is needed is based on how much you feed, and not how much water you have, because the nutrients that cause algae to grow come from the food you feed. The following updated picture has size guidelines:

(will be updated periodically)
Sizing.jpg





And the following updated picture has examples:

(will be updated periodically)
Examples.jpg





So build a UAS and post your pictures!
.
.
.
Do you have a dedicated forum on scrubbers on here like Randy Farley has on chemistry. I think you are the god father of scrubbers. I am going to try another stab at a DIY scrubber and was going to post my details for feedback.
 

CC13

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
779
Location
Toronto, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Anyone have any new and improved ideas or DIY designs?

Might give a scrubber a try for my large tank and I’m looking for inspiration and ideas.
 

Algae invading algae: Have you had unwanted algae in your good macroalgae?

  • I regularly have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 18 34.0%
  • I occasionally have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 11 20.8%
  • I rarely have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 4 7.5%
  • I never have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 5 9.4%
  • I don’t have macroalgae.

    Votes: 14 26.4%
  • Other.

    Votes: 1 1.9%
Back
Top