On a scale of "crucial for success" to "not a big concern," how much emphasis goes to water volume?

How much emphasis do you place on water volume?

  • crucial for success

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • not a big concern

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • Other (please explain)

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • Total voters
    25

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,602
Reaction score
85,990
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
On a scale of "crucial for success" to "not a big concern," how much emphasis do you place on water volume when it comes to your saltwater reef tank?

Does it play a significant role in your tank's stability, or do you believe other factors outweigh its importance?

1685462282927.png
 

Troylee

all about the diy!!!!!
View Badges
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
18,053
Reaction score
13,271
Location
Vegas baby!!!!
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bigger has always been easier in my experience! It’s great for people to learn on a 40gallon breeder etc then upgrade and everything becomes so much easier! But!!! More expensive… lol
 

zheka757

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Messages
2,289
Reaction score
13,271
Location
North Port
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think more bigger, more expenciver. But more forgiving for mistakes. I also think reefer that know what his doing can have a success from 5g tank.
 

Lebowski_

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2023
Messages
1,313
Reaction score
2,407
Location
.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am very happy with my 15g and 25g, not a big consideration for me. Don't have a bigger tank option until we decide on our mortgage, but I know my past bigger tanks had a lot of the same issue.

Depends a lot on how involved you want to be. Bigger allows more auto pilot.
 
OP
OP
revhtree

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,602
Reaction score
85,990
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thanks for the feedback!
 

Dbichler

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
2,288
Reaction score
3,460
Location
Menomonee Falls
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Started with a 54 then 29 biocube to my current 210 with 40b sump. Current tank is so much easier but yes much more expensive. 60 breeders would be the ideal dimensions for a first tank with a 40 breeder sump. I recommend this to most reefers who ask what is an ideal startup tank. Room for equipment and potential for upgrades. Plus these tanks are not costly and can have an excellent choice livestock. All in all water volume is not necessarily crucial for success but definitely makes it easier.
 

Katrina71

Learn, Laugh, Love
View Badges
Joined
Mar 26, 2017
Messages
37,155
Reaction score
209,543
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I guess it depends on how you measure success. What type of coral and fish you prefer? Is success defined by cost and ease of use, or the successes defined by larger water volume's advantages in some cases.
 

paragrouper

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 9, 2023
Messages
1,240
Reaction score
5,801
Location
Shady Shores, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 32 gallon, but I want a 90 gallon—so:

I believe that my current tank is a good learning platform and the smaller volume keeps me on my feet, as I know it is not as forgiving as a larger tank.

However, when speaking to my wife, it is absolutely critical that we upgrade ASAP (I give an awesome “the sky is falling” pitch)
 

zoomonster

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,542
Reaction score
1,611
Location
Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I started in the hobby around 1990 it was generally advised 55g was the minimum. Granted reef technology has grown by leaps and bounds but still prefer larger. From 55g it was only upwards and still looking up lol. More water, more forgiving of error and of course more room for stuff.
 

Fritz05

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Messages
113
Reaction score
101
Location
Orange County
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I believe you can be successful irrespective of the water volume, whereas of course a very small tank can go bad quickly. Also, I believe the "law of diminishing returns" applies : A 50 gallon tank is more forgiving than a 10 gallon, but is a 150 gallon still significantly "better" than a 50 gallon? What about 500 gallons? At some point the higher costs and increased workload (think of even a 10% water change) outweigh the added stability of a larger system in my view.
 

c_ronius

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
70
Reaction score
166
Location
Tampa, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think the ratio of life to water volume is of more importance. I find all tank sizes are way more stable with less crap in them, and vice versa.

At this point in my reefing career, I try (It's hard) to keep my inhabitants to a minimum, or at least way less than most tanks I see. You can spend considerably less time fussing with maintenance and testing by having a higher ratio of water to life. I spend a lot of time away from home, often a week or two away from the tank, and it's comforting to know there is a good buffer if things take a turn.

It's easy to over pack a smaller tank, which usually has no sump with extra water volume. Most (not all) larger volume tanks have a greater water ratio. I think this is why most people seem to think smaller tanks are more difficult.

That said it's of course totally possible to pack em full... I'm guilty... But it's alot more testing and instability to deal with. If you like testing every day and all that mess have at it.
 

Rusty_L_Shackleford

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 7, 2022
Messages
436
Reaction score
719
Location
North Myrtle Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There's definitely a sweet spot. Too small and it's really hard to get it stable. Too big and costs climb quickly. I have a 34g red sea and just started a 32g biocube. I feel like that's a pretty forgiving size. It's big enough to get a little stability, but small enough that the gear and maint isn't prohibitivly expensive.
 
OP
OP
revhtree

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
47,602
Reaction score
85,990
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Loving all the opinions!
 

Lebowski_

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2023
Messages
1,313
Reaction score
2,407
Location
.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's weird to see "crucial for success" winning when there are thousands of small, healthy reefs being posted about daily on this platform and others. I don't see how they can exist and thrive but also that water volume is crucial.

Does that mean these tanks don't meet the definition of successful?

10g
1685635024731.png


2.6g
1685635044120.png


10g
1685635068558.png


10g
1685635093572.png


20g
1685635106874.png


10g
1685635128229.png



There are all from the nano-reef gallery of another forum - lots were run for 8+ years.
 

fish farmer

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 13, 2017
Messages
3,698
Reaction score
5,402
Location
Brandon, VT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's all how you want to manage your box of water.

I started with a sumped 38 gallon, went up to the "bigger is better" 55 then 65, then downgraded to my current system a sumped 29 with big skimmer, chaeto, kalk, ATO.

Both my smaller tanks worked better in my lifestyle. Sure they maybe limiting in space, but that could be said for many common off the shelf sizes.
 

Gumbies R Us

Another Fish in the Sea
View Badges
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
9,590
Reaction score
18,397
Location
North Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's weird to see "crucial for success" winning when there are thousands of small, healthy reefs being posted about daily on this platform and others. I don't see how they can exist and thrive but also that water volume is crucial.

Does that mean these tanks don't meet the definition of successful?

10g
1685635024731.png


2.6g
1685635044120.png


10g
1685635068558.png


10g
1685635093572.png


20g
1685635106874.png


10g
1685635128229.png



There are all from the nano-reef gallery of another forum - lots were run for 8+ years.
Those are all nice too!!
 

Mastering the art of locking and unlocking water pathways: What type of valves do you have on your aquarium plumbing?

  • Ball valves.

    Votes: 38 47.5%
  • Gate valves.

    Votes: 42 52.5%
  • Check valves.

    Votes: 16 20.0%
  • None.

    Votes: 21 26.3%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 10.0%
Back
Top