Parker's Reef did a review of the GHL Ion director, GHL goes on the attack

Status
Not open for further replies.

SecondCityCorals

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
169
Reaction score
205
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So, if you're not much of a watcher of Youtube or don't partake in the community you might not have heard of a small channel called Parker's Reef. I love his channel because he posts a ton of videos, but also because he tries pretty hard to do thorough and unbiased reviews of reef hardware. There are a lot of fanboys out there of many manufacturers and his reviews are honest and unsponsored. So I tend to trust what he has to say.

Anyway, he's reviewed dozens of pieces of reefing equipment from all kinds of manufacturers. If a piece of equipment works well he tells you why. While also going over any negative aspects. And if a piece of equipment does not do well, he will tell you why. While also going over the positive aspects of said equipment.

For the ION director video, he grabbed a weeks worth of data in a reasonably controlled fashion and presented the results. They were.....not very good. The ION director was clearly having some issues. It was a brand new production unit, so it would be the same exact situation had you bought one off of the shelf at your local fish store.

GHL found the review and proceeded to accuse him of executing a hit job and said it was to promote other brands and please the "GHL haters".

unnamed.jpg


Here's the video of his results. I guess you can decide for yourself?
 

blaxsun

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Messages
26,709
Reaction score
31,146
Location
The Abyss
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is a horrible example of how you respond with PR. I would've given the Ion Director a fail when the network diidn't work for the first week.

This thing didn't even work new out-of-the-box. Network failed, testing different samples over a period of weeks yielded high and inconsistent results - and then when he ran it for a few weeks with the same water sample the test results were all over the place.

Sorry, not interested in a product that I have to warranty before it's even turned on...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rtparty

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
4,679
Reaction score
8,053
Location
Utah
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Not surprised. GHL is a stubborn, close minded group that does no wrong. Just ask them. Their fanboys are even worse. I was not surprised one iota to see all the issues Sam was having. It is THE worst software in the game. The cheap Chinese knock off apps are better than GHL's crap.

It is too bad because the Mitras was an incredible light completely ruined by their atrocious software. GHL needs to completely scratch their software team and start over. If they got good software with their hardware, they would be super competitive. As is, they will continue their slide and be number 3 in the US market forever.
 

Potatohead

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
2,428
Reaction score
3,581
Location
Vancouver
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Geesh

I have had a Doser 2.1 for about five years and have been very happy with it. The software is not that great though I will admit that. I don't have a full on controller so I can't comment on that, or other brands.
 

helmsreef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
182
Reaction score
184
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I feel their response to the video is more telling of how they would treat an individual with their own concerns. There are more ways to go about resolving the issues, they could of collaborated in way that would of made their brand marketing even better and shown how their company deals with these issues. But instead they are upset that he didn't keep the concern internal with GHL. I don't believe I would buy GHL because it seems to me like bullying when they don't like what someone says about their product.
 

FishyFishFish

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
1,660
Location
Texas
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
I do like GHL products, although I am not a huge fan of some aspects of their software.

Even so, in my opinion that is an epic PR fail. It seems like they have some major issues in their management structure to post a response like that.

Someone at GHL needs to get a grip of their customer-facing department.
 

Jon's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
987
Location
Madison, WI
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
I had similar issues with connectivity of a stand alone 2.1 doser. It is really hard if you are a Mac house as the usb method requires a pc. It was a good review. I agree that the tech is next gen… but perhaps a little far out still. Also agree that GHL had an opportunity to make it into a PR win… but fumbled.
 

TCoach

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 21, 2021
Messages
589
Reaction score
653
Location
SC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
To All,

Wether you like, dislike, or are undecided about GHL, there is no reason to be so negative on them. Yes this is a big PR fail and should have been handled better, but every company has these fails.

While we all expect our products to work 100% out of the box, there are always some small percentage that make it through QA with an issue. While the YT person had an issue and is free to mention it in the review, it is also incumbent on him to reach out to the company and give them a chance to make it right before releasing the review to the public. There is not a single company in the reef sphere that has been open probably even 6 months or more who has not had some sort of issue.

So let's mark this as a GHL PR fail and a reviewer fail and move on.

Thanks,

TCoach
 

rtparty

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
4,679
Reaction score
8,053
Location
Utah
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
To All,

Wether you like, dislike, or are undecided about GHL, there is no reason to be so negative on them. Yes this is a big PR fail and should have been handled better, but every company has these fails.

While we all expect our products to work 100% out of the box, there are always some small percentage that make it through QA with an issue. While the YT person had an issue and is free to mention it in the review, it is also incumbent on him to reach out to the company and give them a chance to make it right before releasing the review to the public. There is not a single company in the reef sphere that has been open probably even 6 months or more who has not had some sort of issue.

So let's mark this as a GHL PR fail and a reviewer fail and move on.

Thanks,

TCoach

This is par for the course for GHL though and he did reach out to them for help. He talks about that in the review.

To say this is a "one off" is crazy. Anyone who has been around long enough and followed GHL knows this wasn't a "mistake" or poor handling.
 

Potatohead

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
2,428
Reaction score
3,581
Location
Vancouver
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not that it gives them a pass but has any German company ever been known for good customer service?
 

FishyFishFish

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
1,660
Location
Texas
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
To All,

Wether you like, dislike, or are undecided about GHL, there is no reason to be so negative on them. Yes this is a big PR fail and should have been handled better, but every company has these fails.

While we all expect our products to work 100% out of the box, there are always some small percentage that make it through QA with an issue. While the YT person had an issue and is free to mention it in the review, it is also incumbent on him to reach out to the company and give them a chance to make it right before releasing the review to the public. There is not a single company in the reef sphere that has been open probably even 6 months or more who has not had some sort of issue.

So let's mark this as a GHL PR fail and a reviewer fail and move on.

Thanks,

TCoach

The problem is, this is representative of how they deal with their customers from what I have seen.

For example, whilst I joke about product announcements that never happen, there appears to be a general contempt for their own customers that makes them think this is acceptable. Their response to that review is not unlike some customers have received on this forum.

I had got over my frustration with GHL as I now like my setup, but this isn’t going to persuade me to expand - in fact, I am genuinely considering downsizing.

I wish there was just one controller manufacturer that had their stuff together; they all seem to have failings in my opinion. At the moment I am faced with having to choose the ‘least bad’. Until now that was GHL but the gap to the next best is getting narrower by the day, and if they don’t listen to their customers then this won’t get any better IMO.
 

Oldreefer44

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
1,435
Reaction score
1,911
Location
Machias Washington
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As many have stated above, any company that puts their own ego above that of their customers is not worthy of my business. I had an experience with them where i had a defective product. They agreed to refund it but then would only give 50% back once they got it because the probe was a little wet. What did they plan on doing, reselling it as is?
 

hotdrop

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Messages
608
Reaction score
567
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
GHL doser 2.1 works great as long as you don’t try to change the settings. The software is hot steaming dog ****. I think they don’t want to pay what it costs to hire good programmers
 

Cell

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 20, 2019
Messages
14,353
Reaction score
22,029
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What a terrible petty response by GHL. The person should have stopped typing after the first paragraph.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 20 43.5%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 11 23.9%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 14 30.4%
  • Other.

    Votes: 1 2.2%
Back
Top