Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #198 Magnesium Consumption

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,276
Reaction score
63,622
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reef Chemistry Question of the Day # 198

In an aquarium where the alkalinity is depleted by 2.8 dKH and the calcium is depleted by 18 ppm each day, what would be the expected average magnesium depletion over a period of ten days?

A. ~0.3 ppm per day
B. ~1.2 ppm per day
C. ~3.9 ppm per day
D. ~6.7 ppm per day
 
Last edited:

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm going to assume that the depleted alkalinity and calcium are replaced each day by dosing, kalk, CaRX, etc., and that the consumption rate remains constant during those ten days. I know that in your Improved Two-Part article, you assume that magnesium is incorporated at a rate of 2.5% of the skeleton weight, or 6.5% of the calcium portion.

Let's establish that 2.8 dKH = 2.8 / 2.8 = 1 meq/L = 50 PPM CaCO3 = 0.5 moles CO3.

Using the "2.5% of the skeleton" approach, the 0.5 moles of CO3 will weigh 30 mg. Add 18 mg of Ca, and we get 48 mg. That 48 mg is 100% - 2.5% = 97.5% of the total skeleton weight, so the total skeleton weight is going to be 48 / 0.975 = 49.23 mg, of which 1.23 mg is Mg. 1.23 time ten days = 12.3 PPM.

Using the "6.5% of the Ca" approach, the answer is 18 * 6.5% = 1.17 mg times ten days = 11.7 PPM.

Ignoring your assumptions made in another context, and taking the numbers in the question at face value, I see that we have 0.5 moles of CO3, but only 18 / 40 = 0.45 moles of Ca, so the Mg will make up the remaining 0.05 moles. 0.05 moles of Mg weighs 0.05 * 24.3 = 1.215 mg times ten days = 12.15 PPM. This number is 2.47% of the total skeleton weight, and 6.75% of the Ca weight, and, so, is right in line with those other assumptions.

My answer is E: ~12.2 PPM :confused:
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Then I'm going with B: ~1.2 PPM per day. And if it weren't for the typo, then I'd have seen the "per day" part in the first place. And I wouldn't have answered so soon, either. :)
 

DamianOZ

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
111
Reaction score
116
Location
AU
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My tank currently averages the following consumption
Calcium 23.18ppm / day
Alkalinity 3.32dKH / day
Magnesium 7.74ppm / day

My ration of Alk to Ca consumption isn't 2.8 dKH to 18ppm it is 2.8dKH to 19.54ppm
The expected average magnesium depletion for 2.8 dKH Alkalinity = 6.53ppm
or if calculated at 18 ppm calcium the expected Mg = 6.01ppm

D would be the closest answer.
 

DamianOZ

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
111
Reaction score
116
Location
AU
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
2.8dKH = 50ppm equivalent CaCO3
The molecular weight of CaCO3 is 100.0869 g/ml and the molecular weight of calcium is 40.078 g/mol, therefore (rounded) Ca ppm as CaCO3 = (2.5*Ca ppm)
The molecular weight of MgCO3 is 84.3139 g/mol and the molecular weight of magnesium is 24.305 g/mol, therefore (rounded) Mg ppm as MgCO3 = (4.1*Mg ppm)

For 2.8dKH Alkalinity (50ppm Alkalinity) we expect 20ppm Ca to be used. If 18ppm Ca is used, Mg is taking the place of 2ppm Ca.
To calculate the magnesium equivalent for 2ppm Ca
2ppm Ca x 2.5 = 5ppm Alk
5ppm Alk / 4.1 = 1.22ppm Mg

Therefore the answer = B



I wander where all my Mg is going :)
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,276
Reaction score
63,622
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And the answer is...B. ~1.2 ppm per day

Folks have shown the math, so I won't bother repeating it.

One reason for this question is for folks to realize that apparent magnesium depletion rates of more than a couple of ppm per day are likely coming from other causes, such as magnesium testing issues, or water changes.

Happy Reefing! :)
 

Algae invading algae: Have you had unwanted algae in your good macroalgae?

  • I regularly have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 39 33.9%
  • I occasionally have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 24 20.9%
  • I rarely have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 9 7.8%
  • I never have unwanted algae in my macroalgae.

    Votes: 8 7.0%
  • I don’t have macroalgae.

    Votes: 31 27.0%
  • Other.

    Votes: 4 3.5%
Back
Top