- Joined
- Jul 26, 2016
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 43
I'm counting carbon atoms (weight or number), not moles of something they may be a part of.
let's have some math fun...
There are a lot of carbon atoms in each big whale (assume 300,000 pounds, guess 10% carbon (might be a low estimate due to blubber having a lot of carbon ), so maybe a million moles, or 7 x 10^29 carbon atoms, and quite a few whales (roughly one million, but most aren't that big). So 10^6 x 7 x 10^29 = 7 x 10^35 carbon atoms in whales.
There are also a lot of bicarbonate ions in seawater, with just one carbon atom each. A liter of seawater might contain 2 millimoles of bicarbonate, or 10^21 bicarbonate ions. Total volume of the ocean is about 1.3 billion cubic kilometers. There are 10^12 liters in a cubic kilometer, so that's 1.3 x 10^21 liters. Thus the carbon due to bicarbonate ion is about 1.3 x 10^42.
So there's very roughly 1.3 x 10^42/7 x 10^35 = ~2 million times as much carbon in bicarbonate as in whales.
Almost.
Avogadro's number is 6.022 * 10^23, so these should be "6 x 10^29" and "1.2 x 10^21" respectively. That means that the 1.3 should be multiplied by the 1.2 to become 1.6, and then the division at the end returns 1.6 x 10^42/6 x 10^35 = 2.6 million, which would round to 3 million instead of just 2 million.
Standing Ovations for both of you.