Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #264 Temperature and Refractometers

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #264

Most reef aquarists that use refractometers are aware that the refractive index changes with temperature. Some handheld refractometers account for temperature by employing a bimetal strip inside them. This bimetal strip expands and contracts as the temperature changes. The bimetal strip is attached to the optics inside the refractometer, moving them slightly as the temperature changes. This movement is designed to exactly cancel temperature’s effects on refractive index.

Suppose that you have a refractometer that DOES NOT have such a temperature correction, and is properly made to read seawater salinity at 20 degrees C (68 degrees F).

If you measure salinity at 30 degrees C (86 degrees F), the reading you get from the refractometer will incorrectly give approximately what value when the water is really 35 ppt salinity?

A. 30 ppt
B. 34.1 ppt
C. 35.9 ppt
D. 40 ppt

Pick the closest choice to what you think the answer is. :)

Good luck!

















































.
 

Crabs McJones

I'm so shi-nay
View Badges
Joined
Jul 24, 2017
Messages
27,297
Reaction score
138,265
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm going to guess A. I know the value is lower because of a quote I read from you. It I dont know the exact math to know the actual salinity. So shot in the dark. A final answer

Edit: changed my answer to A
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm going to guess B. I know the value is lower because of a quote I read from you. It I dont know the exact math to know the actual salinity. So shot in the dark. B final answer

I didn't know the magnitude until I just worked it out for this question. :)
 

largepolyp

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 22, 2017
Messages
76
Reaction score
62
Location
evansville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
im gonna just guess d . but i have a question for you Randy what do you use to measure your salinity? im tryin to decide if its worth it to upgrade to a digital or the tropic marin hydrometer. TIA
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
im gonna just guess d . but i have a question for you Randy what do you use to measure your salinity? im tryin to decide if its worth it to upgrade to a digital or the tropic marin hydrometer. TIA

I like using conductivity. It's quick and continuous in situations like acclimation of a new creature.

Optimal is something like a used Orion from Ebay (too expensive new). I have the Model 128.

The Pinpoint is also OK, but takes longer to equilibrate to the water temperature, so is slower to get a reading.
 

Chuk

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
439
Reaction score
351
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I get 1.028 sg using my home brew correction chart which is like 37 ppt. I’ll go with d since that’s the closest price is right style
 

Sleepydoc

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 10, 2017
Messages
1,423
Reaction score
1,266
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I had to read the question a couple of times - thought it said that the actual reading was 35 ppt but it’s actually asking for what would the refractometer reading be when the water is 35 ppt (at 30º C)

It’s going to read less dense at a higher temperature, so it’s either A or B. I don’t have the formula, but 10º C is a big enough difference that I’ll say A.
 

Chuk

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
439
Reaction score
351
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I had to read the question a couple of times - thought it said that the actual reading was 35 ppt but it’s actually asking for what would the refractometer reading be when the water is 35 ppt (at 30º C)

It’s going to read less dense at a higher temperature, so it’s either A or B. I don’t have the formula, but 10º C is a big enough difference that I’ll say A.

You're right I read that wrong. 1.028 is what the reading really be would be if you read the 35 ppt at 30C. Again with the hombrew chart I get 1.024 which is just under 32 ppt
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,963
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #264

Most reef aquarists that use refractometers are aware that the refractive index changes with temperature. Some handheld refractometers account for temperature by employing a bimetal strip inside them. This bimetal strip expands and contracts as the temperature changes. The bimetal strip is attached to the optics inside the refractometer, moving them slightly as the temperature changes. This movement is designed to exactly cancel temperature’s effects on refractive index.

Suppose that you have a refractometer that DOES NOT have such a temperature correction, and is properly made to read seawater salinity at 20 degrees C (68 degrees F).

If you measure salinity at 30 degrees C (86 degrees F), the reading you get from the refractometer will incorrectly give approximately what value when the water is really 35 ppt salinity?

A. 30 ppt
B. 34.1 ppt
C. 35.9 ppt
D. 40 ppt

Pick the closest choice to what you think the answer is. :)

Good luck!




B












































.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,963
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #264

Most reef aquarists that use refractometers are aware that the refractive index changes with temperature. Some handheld refractometers account for temperature by employing a bimetal strip inside them. This bimetal strip expands and contracts as the temperature changes. The bimetal strip is attached to the optics inside the refractometer, moving them slightly as the temperature changes. This movement is designed to exactly cancel temperature’s effects on refractive index.

Suppose that you have a refractometer that DOES NOT have such a temperature correction, and is properly made to read seawater salinity at 20 degrees C (68 degrees F).

If you measure salinity at 30 degrees C (86 degrees F), the reading you get from the refractometer will incorrectly give approximately what value when the water is really 35 ppt salinity?

A. 30 ppt
B. 34.1 ppt
C. 35.9 ppt
D. 40 ppt

Pick the closest choice to what you think the answer is. :)

Good luck!

















































.
B
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
According to this calculator, which agrees with the data found in this paper, the answer is about 28.6, so I'm going with A.

FWIW, I did find a surprising amount of variability as I checked some different sources. My first source matched yours and I went with A being below 30. A second was just about 30. :)
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And the answer is...A

If you measure salinity at 30 degrees C (86 degrees F), the reading you get from the refractometer will incorrectly give approximately what value when the water is really 35 ppt salinity?

A. 30 ppt
B. 34.1 ppt
C. 35.9 ppt
D. 40 ppt

It surprised me when I looked into it in detail, but the temperature effect is very large, making the accuracy (or not) of the ATC of significant importance with a refractometer. As Jim noted, some papers suggest the value is a bit below 30 ppt. :)
 

chipmunkofdoom2

Always Making Something
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
2,417
Reaction score
4,497
Location
Baltimore, MD
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I like using conductivity. It's quick and continuous in situations like acclimation of a new creature.

Optimal is something like a used Orion from Ebay (too expensive new). I have the Model 128.

The Pinpoint is also OK, but takes longer to equilibrate to the water temperature, so is slower to get a reading.

Not to clutter up this thread too much, but I have the Pinpoint and can confirm this. I usually have to set a timer for 4 - 5 minutes to allow the reading to stabilize. Other than that, no complaints. I definitely like measuring conductivity a lot better than measuring specific gravity or refractive index.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
According to this calculator, which agrees with the data found in this paper, the answer is about 28.6, so I'm going with A.

How did you use that calculator, Jim? Did I miss an easy way to enter temperature?

I looked up the refractive index drop that was reported in a paper, and used your linked calculator to get about 30 ppt, which was higher than the "below 30 ppt" that I got from my own article data table on refractive index vs salinity, so I changed the description in A. :)
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How did you use that calculator, Jim? Did I miss an easy way to enter temperature?

I looked up the refractive index drop that was reported in a paper, and used your linked calculator to get about 30 ppt, which was higher than the "below 30 ppt" that I got from my own article data table on refractive index vs salinity, so I changed the description in A. :)
You have to scroll over to the right on the "Refractive Index Calculator" worksheet, to cell V4.
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Please say that ATC refractometers are good to use. They are the auto temp corrected ones, right?

They are supposed to be. [emoji23]
 

High pressure shells: Do you look for signs of stress in the invertebrates in your reef tank?

  • I regularly look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 29 31.2%
  • I occasionally look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 23 24.7%
  • I rarely look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 18 19.4%
  • I never look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 23 24.7%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top