USING HANNA CHECKER HI-707 TO TEST FOR IODINE

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
USING HANNA CHECKER HI-707 TO TEST FOR IODINE
In my quest to improve my testing accuracy and precision I found the standard colorimetric tests for Iodine difficult to get any kind of accurate reading and the repeatability (precision) was not very good. Being that I dosed Iodine this made me uneasy about the actual levels. So I decided to take the same approach I did with Nitrates. I found a Hanna Checker that I could use with the Red Sea Iodine Test Chemistry and proceed to set up a DIY test protocol. What follows is a bit of background on the test development, the data on accuracy and precision…The test procedure in detail (video) and comparisons of results to outside testing services.
My quest started well over a year ago and has taken several twists and turns…Different test chemistries…different measuring instruments…different procedural steps, and combinations thereof. I will not bore you with all of the details (and there are lots) but will hit the highlights that support the results.
Here is what I will cover:

  • Summary ---The Procedure (With Video)
  • The principle of the test
  • The Chemistry
  • The Instrument
  • The generation of the regression
  • The Standards
  • The Measurements
  • Goodness of Regression Fit
  • The test Accuracy Results
  • The test Precision Results
  • The test results measured against outside testing
  • Additional Work
SUMMARY
This summary provides the general details of the procedure step by step. It is intended to go along with the posted video and will allow to perform the test without going into the technical details of the procedure development. For those of you who might be interest in the details of the test development and all the “Technical Stuff” that starts with section
II THE PRINCIPLE.


I THE PROCEDURE

EQUIPMENT NECESSARY

1) Hanna HI-707 Nitrite LR Checker
2) Red Sea Iodine Pro Reagents A & B
3) Two Hanna Checker Vials
4) Timer
5) Accurate Pipette(s) or Syringe cable of measuring .5 mL and .8 mL
6) RODI Water for rinsing vials & pipettes
7) Accurate Thermometer
8) Sample Water Container (I use a beaker or plastic bottle)

PROCEDURE…STEP BY STEP (See Included Video)

1) Fill vial with water to be tested. This will be the Blank. Place it into the Checker
2) Set Timer to 1 Minute 45 seconds
3) Rinse second vial with water to be tested
4) Fill second vial with water to be tested.
5) Add .5 mL of reagent “A” to second vial containing the test water.
6) Add .8 mL of reagent “B’ to the second test vial — IMMEDIATELY START TIMER!!
7) Put the cap on the second vial and invert the vial several times
8) Press the button on the Hanna Checker…When “C1” appears press again….”C2” will now be on the display.
9) Remove the blank vial from the checker and put the second vial into the checker.
10) The Timer should be still counting down from 1:45…When the timer reaches “0” IMMEDIATELY PRESS THE BUTTON ON THE CHECKER TO GET THE READING
11) Record the value appearing on the meter…This is the value you put onto the formula below.
12) MEASURE AND RECORD THE TEMPERATURE OF THE SAMPLE BEING TESTED

NOTE ON TEMPERATURE: Temperature below 73⁰F at lower iodine (<.02ppm) concentration levels will cause the HI-707 to exceed its measurement limits of 600. It is recommended to keep the sample temperature above 73⁰F. See the section on the “Regression Equations” for details in calculating the PPM iodine.

Multiply the meter reading by -.0003292492 then add 0.1973653 This will = PPM Iodine

Example: (No Temperature Correction)

Meter Reading 422


1) 422 x -0.0003292492 = -0.138943162
2) -0.138943162 + 0.1973653 = 0.058 PPM Iodine

NOTE ON TEMPERATURE: Temperature below 73⁰F at lower iodine (<.02ppm) concentration levels will cause the HI-707 to exceed its measurement limits of 600. It is recommended to keep the sample temperature above 73⁰F. See the section on the “Regression Equations” for details in calculating the PPM iodine.

NOTES ON THE PROCEDURE: The time is very critical to achieving accurate and precise results so paying attention to start and stop times is important. In addition the accurate measurement of the reagents is important to getting good results. I generally run two tests back to back and take an average of the values. If the two results are greater than 5% from each other I run a third test and take the average of the 3 as my value…This does not happen very often. (See Table 3) Total testing time is approximately 6-8 minutes….One note on the video. The video shows Step 7 and 8 in different order than the procedure calls for…The procedure is the correct way.

VIDEO of PROCEDURE





II THE PRINCIPLE

The principle is much the same as other colorimetric tests. A sample is mixed with a series of reagents that react with the ion being tested for in such a way as to produce a distinct color. The saturation of the color is proportional to the concentration of the ion in the test water. Is some tests the higher the concentration the more saturated the color (directly proportional to concentration). In other tests (like the Red Sea Iodine Test) the higher the concentration the lower the saturation (Inversely proportional). Once the reaction is complete the color can be compared to a standard color card or measured spectrophotometrically by using an instrument like a Hanna Checker to determine the value.

THE CHEMISTRY
The chemistry I chose for my work is the Red Sea Iodine Pro Test. I tried others but this one ended up the best for my application. I am not going to go into the chemistry itself but am going to note two important factors that impact the outcome of the test results.
First the reaction is time sensitive….This is best illustrated by Figure 1.

1575393753298.png

Fig 1

As you can see as the level of Iodine concentration increases the steeper the time dependency becomes. I ran two tests at each level to confirm the results. The red line represents the time interval I chose as my standard time, 1 min 45 seconds. I chose this because this was the time interval that the Red Sea Standard matched the .06 level on the standard color card but given the results in Fig 1 other time intervals could work. The implications of this time dependency on the test procedure is the test must be accurately timed.

The second factor is the reaction is temperature dependent. See Fig 2

1575393864288.png

Fig 2

Again I ran two sample sets to confirm the results. The outcome is for every 1⁰ F it changes the meter value by ±5 units. The implications for this temperature dependency are that the sample temperature needs to be folded into the regression formula.

Note: Temperatures below 73⁰F at the lower levels of Iodine (<.02) will exceed the range of the HI-707 Meter (600). So it is recommended if the sample temperature is below 73⁰F that the sample be warmed up.

THE INSTRUMENT

The Hanna Checker I finally chose after testing several others is the HI-707 Low Range Nitrite Colorimeter. Its light source is a 470nm LED. It measures in parts per billion from 0- to 600 ppb. Stated accuracy is ± 20 ppb ± 5% of meter reading. The detector is a Silicon Photocell. After running multiple Iodine samples at 5 different levels (.01, .03, .06, .07, and .1 ppm) the relative precision was very good < ± 5 % of the mean at every level except the .01ppm level which was higher because it is near the limits of detection.

III. THE REGRESSION

THE STANDARDS
All of the standards were prepared using reagent grade potassium iodide (KI). The standard levels prepared were .01, .03, .06, .1 ppm using a volumetric flask and an analytical scale. The water used to prepare the standards was salt water made from reagent grade Sodium Chloride at 35 ppt. There is a slight salinity effect (See Fig 3) so standards should be prepared in water close to your tanks standard salinity. It does not work with RODI water! Two sets of standards were prepared and compared against each other to cheek for errors. In addition some time later a 3 set was prepared as a final validation. I also prepared two sets of standards using the Red Sea Potassium Standard (KI) and measured them as well. There is a great deal of data associated with this project. I will not bore you with all of it just the final confirmation data will be included in this write up. If you are interested PM me and I would be happy to share it with you.

THE MEASUREMENT
Each standard was measured a minimum of 5 times and in some cases 8 times according to the above procedure. The data was recorded and used to generate the regression curve for the PPM Iodine calculation (See Table 1). I used the Excel Data Analysis as well as a program called MyCurveFit (
https://www.mycurvefit.com/ ) to generate the regression curve. (See Fig 4 & 5)

1575394123966.png

TABLE 1

1575394230379.png

Fig 3


1575394289854.png

Fig 4


1575394398217.png

Fig 5

GOODNESS OF FIT

The goodness of fit of a statistical model describes how well it fits a set of observations. Measures of goodness of fit typically summarize the discrepancy between observed values and the values expected under the model in question. In the above figure the columns labeled “Measure” and “Value provide the data for the Goodness of fit for the selected regression. The low P value and high F value are indicators that the regression is good. Also the Standard Error of the Estimate (SE) is low which indicates the regression is relatively accurate.



THE REGRESSION EQUATIONS

Y= The Calculated PPM of Iodine X= The Meter Reading on the Hanna Checker
T= The Temperature of the sample being tested

NO TEMP CORRECTION
Y= -0.0003292492 x X+ .01973653
To get the PPM Iodine—
1) Multiply the Meter reading Value By -0.0003292492
2) Then add to the value in step 1 + .01973653

TEMP CORRECTION Y= -.0003417494 x (((T-79)x 5) + X)) +0.2008589

To get the PPM Iodine---
1) Subtract 79 from the measured sample temperature. Note if T is less than 79 the number will be negative.
2) Multiply the value from step 1 by 5.
3) Take the value from step 2 and add it to the meter reading…Note the number may be negative so you will need to subtract it
4) Multiply the value from step 3 by
5) Then add to the value in step 4 ----THIS IS THE PPM Iodine in Your sample

EXAMPLES
Meter Reading 422
Temperature of Sample 77⁰ F

NO TEMPERATURE CORRECTION

1) 422 x -0.0003292492= -0.138943162
2) -0.138943162 + 0.1973653 = 0.058 PPM Iodine

TEMPERATURE CORRECTION

1) 77-79 = -2
2) 5 X -2= -10
3) 422-10= 412 This is the meter reading corrected for temperature
4) 412 X -0.0003417494 = -0.140800753
5) -0.140800753 + 0.2008589 = .06 PPM Iodine

As you can see the difference between the temperature corrected value and the uncorrected value are not significant so the simpler method would be the better choice. However when the sample temperature is 75 or less or above 83 it starts to become significant…
Remember this is not the tank temperature it is the sample temperature. The sample may have set around for a period of time and gotten cooler or warmer depending on the environment.

IV. TEST ACCURACY & PRECISION

KNOWN STANDARDS RESULTS:

1575395976800.png

TABLE 2

For Accuracy I use Relative Accuracy (RA).

This value is expressed as a %. Any value less than or greater than 100% indicates a level of error. The relative Error can then be found by subtracting the Relative Accuracy from 100. The math looks like this:
(Actual value) - (Actual value – Measured Value) divide this by the Actual value

For Precision we will use Relative Standard Deviation (RSD).

This value expressed in % tells us if the calculated standard deviation is small or large compared to the average value for our data set. A small number means there is small variability in our data clustered around the average. This would indicate good repeatability. A large number would indicate a lot of variability in our measurement. The math looks like this
(Standard Deviation of the Data Set x 100) Divide by (The Average Value of the Data Set)

The accuracy and Precision are quite good for this regression (See Table 2). The .01PPM has a lower level of Accuracy and Precision due to the fact the test is approaching the limits of detection for the test but none the less it is still within an acceptable range for my use. I am currently working to refine the test to get better results at the lower levels.


RELATIVE PRECISION OF METER READING & CALCULATED PPM

As I mentioned above I have been measuring the sample 2-3 times to get an idea of the precision of the test. Table 3 shows the meter readings and calculated PPM over several test dates testing my tank water. As you can see the relative precision is very good. The lower the percentage the more repeatable the test is. Because the relative precision is this good I would feel confident in taking a single measurement.

1575396312305.png

TABLE 3


OUTSIDE TESTING LABS RESULTS:

Over the last year I have been sending my water samples to 3 outside testing labs and the comparing my results to theirs. (See Table 4)

1575396388702.png

TABLE 4

As the data in Table 4 shows my results using this test for the most part agree with the outside testing service results. The 9/16/19 results were an error on my part. A retest of the sample gave a result of .057ppm. I am not sure why the outside testing results from vendor # 3 are so much lower, but as you can see they are consistently lower.

V. CONCLUSIONS

Well that about sums it up. The test is relatively simple to do, but does take some practice. By paying close attention to time and temperature good accurate and repeatable results can be obtained. I am continuing the work to improve the lower level accuracy and precision and continue to use the test to monitor the Iodine level in my tanks.
If you have any feedback or question don’t hesitate to PM me…Hope you find this useful.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to personally thank @Dan_P and @taricha for their help and support. Their input and direction provided insights to working on developing this test. It is great to be in community like Reef 2 Reef where quality people like these two are willing to come along side to encourage and support….Thanks for your help!

An alternative test method was developed by @taricha. It uses a different Hanna Checker and a different test kit. It is a good repeatable test. The details can be found in the link below.


https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/iodide-test-seachem-kit-and-hanna-silica-meter.391003/

NOTE: There is an updated version of this test that provides a bit more accuracy and precision...Here is the link to the article https://www.reef2reef.com/ams/an-accurate-and-precise-method-for-measuring-iodine.909/
 
Last edited:

Dan_P

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
6,573
Reaction score
7,031
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very nice write up of some very meticulous work. The video was a good idea for illustrating your method. Also, your lab is sooooo organized. Is it really like this or were you putting on the dog for the video? Where did you get that plexiglas organizer for all your Hanna chemical envelopes?
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very nice write up of some very meticulous work. The video was a good idea for illustrating your method. Also, your lab is sooooo organized. Is it really like this or were you putting on the dog for the video? Where did you get that plexiglas organizer for all your Hanna chemical envelopes?

Thank you sir...You have a great contribution to this!!

Actually no special attention was made to put on the dog :)...This is the normal status ...It comes from my fathers training in wood working and mechanics work..."Knowing where you tools are is the best way to spend time doing what you like and not conducting a search party" ...kinda stuck with me in my hobbies:) ...can be a slight bit ODC about it but it is a time saver :)...I have attached a picture ...As for the Acrylic organizer....I constructed it from plexaglass sheet...I have made several things to take time out of tank maintenance and organize my activity to have more time to enjoy my tank ...see attached pics

Thanks again for all your support


20190907_131811.jpg

Full shot of my lab

20191204_085816.jpg

Hanna Reagent organizer

IMG_20161219_104939999_HDR.jpg

For doser calibration...Lets me calibrate 4 doser at one time..much quicker!:)

IMG_20161219_114957284_HDR.jpg

For pH probe calibration...Easy to move from one location to another
 

Dan_P

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
6,573
Reaction score
7,031
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you sir...You have a great contribution to this!!

Actually no special attention was made to put on the dog :)...This is the normal status ...It comes from my fathers training in wood working and mechanics work..."Knowing where you tools are is the best way to spend time doing what you like and not conducting a search party" ...kinda stuck with me in my hobbies:) ...can be a slight bit ODC about it but it is a time saver :)...I have attached a picture ...As for the Acrylic organizer....I constructed it from plexaglass sheet...I have made several things to take time out of tank maintenance and organize my activity to have more time to enjoy my tank ...see attached pics

Thanks again for all your support


20190907_131811.jpg

Full shot of my lab

20191204_085816.jpg

Hanna Reagent organizer

IMG_20161219_104939999_HDR.jpg

For doser calibration...Lets me calibrate 4 doser at one time..much quicker!:)

IMG_20161219_114957284_HDR.jpg

For pH probe calibration...Easy to move from one location to another

These pictures are too cool for words. I now have a new standard of excellence in organizing a lab to strive for...and some extra plexiglass laying around looking for a good use.
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
These pictures are too cool for words. I now have a new standard of excellence in organizing a lab to strive for...and some extra plexiglass laying around looking for a good use.

Your too kind!...:)
 

Js.Aqua.Project

Reef Addict
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
1,740
Reaction score
3,541
Location
Ocala, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very nice write up of some very meticulous work. The video was a good idea for illustrating your method. Also, your lab is sooooo organized. Is it really like this or were you putting on the dog for the video? Where did you get that plexiglas organizer for all your Hanna chemical envelopes?
His lab is really like that....

@Hanna Instruments are you guys working with @Rick Mathew yet?
 

clm65

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Messages
684
Reaction score
770
Location
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I noticed the roll of TP under your desk. Either you're spending way too much time in your lab, or you found another use for it :) .

And I agree that Hanna needs to get you on their payroll! Well done!
 

Sisterlimonpot

Effortless Perfection
View Badges
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
3,807
Reaction score
7,821
Location
Litchfield Park
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Couple clarifying questions:

Sometime in the early stages of using Hanna checkers, I was conditioned to run the entire test with the same vial. For the simple fact that any imperfections in the clarity of the glass from one vial to another will skew accuracy. When placing the vial into the egg, I even index the vial so that the LED light passes through the same portion of glass limiting any chance for mechanical/user error. I'm not sure where I picked up these traits, I want to say it was around the time the first calcium checkers came onto the scene and we all know how those testers were received. Is there a reason why you don't concern yourself with those steps?

Second question is: What's the purpose of NOT closing the lid during tests?
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
7,967
Reaction score
17,183
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wow......my head hurts from this thread lol. I wish I was smart enough to use all of this, most likely, very helpful information :D
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Couple clarifying questions:

Sometime in the early stages of using Hanna checkers, I was conditioned to run the entire test with the same vial. For the simple fact that any imperfections in the clarity of the glass from one vial to another will skew accuracy. When placing the vial into the egg, I even index the vial so that the LED light passes through the same portion of glass limiting any chance for mechanical/user error. I'm not sure where I picked up these traits, I want to say it was around the time the first calcium checkers came onto the scene and we all know how those testers were received. Is there a reason why you don't concern yourself with those steps?

Second question is: What's the purpose of NOT closing the lid during tests?

Thank you for your response...and two good questions.

With regard to your first question...Part 1..."Running the entire test with the same vial" I took the lead from Hanna and their "Certified Standards" Kits. They provide 2 vials...One "zero" and one Test vial. Which means that the initial measurement was made with the "zero" vial and the test vial. I did the very same thing when I developed the test...I used a "blank" (same one every time) to do all of my measurements.

As for the alignment question...I did not emphasize this point but if you look closely in the video at the vials and the tester you will see that on the tester is a black mark at the top of the "egg" and a white mark on the vial which I line up every time (see attached picture)

20190926_095421.jpg


The question about not closing the lid ...I just make sure the vial and measurement chamber is covered and nave never completely latched it closed...Have you observed a difference when conducting a test?...Never really thought about it..

Thank for reading the article and your questions
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Question: In the list of equipment under #1 shouldn't that state Red Sea iodine not nitrate?

WOW..How did I miss that!!! thanks for the heads up...will get that corrected!!
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I noticed the roll of TP under your desk. Either you're spending way too much time in your lab, or you found another use for it :) .

And I agree that Hanna needs to get you on their payroll! Well done!

:D:D...Both of these statements are true!...I actually use it to handle the vials and to dab off the mouth of the vials to prevent liquid from running down the outside of the vial after I have pored them out..(See The video)
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wow......my head hurts from this thread lol. I wish I was smart enough to use all of this, most likely, very helpful information :D

Thanks...but smart is not required...Only a bit of tenacity!!!...I am living proof of this :oops:
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

lavoisier

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
7,436
Location
Overland Park, KS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is off topic but not having been in a chemistry since high school (50 years ago!) I did not know these single channel pipettes existed. When I watched a video on using it correctly the clinician disposed of the tips each time she used them. At $.30 each that is a little steep for my self-funded "lab." ;) My question may justly cause you to roll your eyes but I'll risk that and ask, if I label the tips and only use each type in specific regents can I get away with reusing them?
 
OP
OP
Rick Mathew

Rick Mathew

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
4,735
Location
North Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is off topic but not having been in a chemistry since high school (50 years ago!) I did not know these single channel pipettes existed. When I watched a video on using it correctly the clinician disposed of the tips each time she used them. At $.30 each that is a little steep for my self-funded "lab." ;) My question may justly cause you to roll your eyes but I'll risk that and ask, if I label the tips and only use each type in specific regents can I get away with reusing them?

WOW...That is Steep for the tips...I do not pay anywhere near that ...Here is where I get them...you can get all the tip sizes from here...The two below are the 1mL and 10 mL sizes




 
Back
Top