Very few companies choose to share what they put in these supplements. Seachem and Aquaforrest do provide some insight into their compositions. They both list 4 aminos, 2 overlap and AF says "among others" rather than giving a guaranteed analysis. Red Sea does no say which aminos but does say that they include "4 carbohydrates from which the coral can synthesize 16 out of 20 essential amino acids." And then we have the two products that sit on either end of the cost spectrum, TLF Acropower is the cheapest and has been around for the longest and Brightwell/KX are the most expensive and Brightwell is receiving all the hype, none provide information on the specific blend. Brightwell says "closely approximates ratios of amino acids present in many species of stony corals."
And then we have the hype, many professional coral farmers claim to use Brightwell and BRS is happy to assert that claim at every opportunity, at least that is what I have noticed. Why professionals would use the the most expensive product is beyond me, 14x the cost of Acropower based on recommended dose. But I would have to guess they are being given the product as a promotional ploy because I can't see another reason why BRS has been so biased towards them. They are typically more scientific about these things but apparently they are currently running a test with Brightwell against a control, no other aminos?
Am I off base here, maybe I am about BRS because I don't religiously watch all of their videos. Also the narrative that is clearly being painted is that Brightwell's product is just that much better than the rest. Is their any evidence to back that up?
And then we have the hype, many professional coral farmers claim to use Brightwell and BRS is happy to assert that claim at every opportunity, at least that is what I have noticed. Why professionals would use the the most expensive product is beyond me, 14x the cost of Acropower based on recommended dose. But I would have to guess they are being given the product as a promotional ploy because I can't see another reason why BRS has been so biased towards them. They are typically more scientific about these things but apparently they are currently running a test with Brightwell against a control, no other aminos?
Am I off base here, maybe I am about BRS because I don't religiously watch all of their videos. Also the narrative that is clearly being painted is that Brightwell's product is just that much better than the rest. Is their any evidence to back that up?