Why no electrolysis or hydrogen dosing to raise pH?

KenRexford

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
354
Reaction score
415
Location
Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As I was thinking on this, I started to chuckle. If you recall the movie Idiocracy, the cure to everything was supposed to be electrolytes from "Brawndo," which when put on plants obviously killed the plants. So, maybe my idea is for pouring Brawndo into my tank, with expected bad results.

However, as electrolysis seems to break H2O into oxygen (plants and animals love oxygen) and Hydrogen (pH rises with more hydrogen), it seemed somewhat intuitive that maybe that aspect of hydrolysis might be good for reef tanks, both to raise pH and to raise oxygen, both of which seem good. Granted, bubbling out would not gain anything, but maybe a "hydrolysis reactor" attachment might somehow keep the oxygen and hydrogen in solution, maybe in the ATO or something, to raise pH?

The obvious problem seems to be that NaCl when used as the medium apparently causes free chlorine also, which is great for swimming pools but not so much for reef tanks. However, that's when I thought about the ATO, where maybe the ATO water could be made hyper-base water early enough for the Na and Cl to group back together, or gas off, or something. Or, maybe some reactor device could somehow use some sort of mechanism or something to clean out the bad stuff before the hydrogen and oxygen went into the tank (like a magnet to catch the sodium, gas off the chlorine).

On that note, why not just simply dose hydrogen gas (other than the obvious Hindenburg tank risk)?

There has to be an obvious reason why all of this is nuts, but it might be fun for someone with knowledge to point out how ignorant my thinking truly is.
 

BadSquishy

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 23, 2016
Messages
68
Reaction score
109
Location
Worcester, Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I mean… there are easier ways.. but I think the main issue would be:
Live open wires + saltwater + the general public = inevitable disaster

edit: typos
 

Uzidaisies

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 7, 2021
Messages
851
Reaction score
899
Location
Central NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Do you mean electrolysis like direct current? Maybe I’m the idiot, but exposing living animals and the equipment in the water to direct current sounds bad. I’m not too keen on how electricity even works to be honest. lol.
 
OP
OP
KenRexford

KenRexford

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
354
Reaction score
415
Location
Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
OK, so far, the objections seem easily remediable. If this could somehow work, you just have an electrolysis reactor where the water is pumped in and out by way of silicon tubing (non-conductive), with the electricity arcing between two points in the chamber. I cannot imagine that an arcing of electricity over, say, a 1mm gap deep within an external reactor would allow much in the way of stray voltage to pass into the tank through the tubing. But, if it does, then the solution for that would seem to be a completely separated reactor.

I mean, imagine a system where water is pumped into the reaction chamber top but actually drips in so that there is no direct stream. Similarly, the water drips into the tank. Maybe "drips" being pre-measured larger amounts (think those wave-maker dumping things). You pump water into a mini-bucket, which spills like a kid's water park bucket into a chamber. The chamber, outside the tank, then fills a second "bucket" over the sump. The buckets fill and empty quickly enough, and are small enough, to avoid ATO devices going berzerk.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,085
Reaction score
63,416
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
OK, so far, the objections seem easily remediable.

No, it would likely be a disaster, and not help pH (assuming both electrodes were in the tank).

A little science clears this up.

First, pH has absolutely nothing to do with O2 or H2 (hydrogen) levels. Adding O2 or H2 will not boost pH and removing it does not lower pH.

The only things that determine pH in 35 ppt seawater at a fixed temperature are the carbonate alkalinity and the level of CO2. Together, they can mathematically determine the pH.

Second, H2 and O2 are NOT the only things that form from electrolysis of seawater. Chlorine (Cl2) is formed, and that would kill the tank.


"In the electrolysis of salt water, such as seawater, the ultimate goal is to produce hydrogen at the cathode," explains Ph.D. student Jan Vos from the Leiden Institute of Chemistry. "The product formed at the anode is ideally oxygen, because that is harmless to the environment." However, during salt water electrolysis toxic chlorine gas can also form at the anode."
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,085
Reaction score
63,416
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Doesn’t pH drop with more hydrogen since pH is inversely proportional to hydrogen ions ?!

The product is hydrogen gas, H2, not H+. :)

It might lead to a big fire when it explodes, but it won't alter pH. :)

Both the fact that H2 doesn't impact pH, and burns faster than almost anything are reasons to not simply add H2 from any other source.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,085
Reaction score
63,416
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would add that folks have done electrolysis of seawater in the open ocean to help nearby corals grow, but that is not readily translated to a closed reef tank.

The chemistry of that effect is discussed here:

Reef Restoration Using Seawater Electrolysis in Jamaica

"The stimulation of calcareous organisms of all types on the artificial reef, and the relative paucity of non-calcifying organisms, is probably largely due to the boost the former receive from locally alkaline conditions, which allow them to grow their skeletons at lower energetic cost because they do not have to use metabolic energy to pump protons away from calcification sites to maintain internal pH homeostasis "
 

christhereefer

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 5, 2021
Messages
21
Reaction score
12
Location
Sunnyvale
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is great thinking! You’re right that electrolysis “ breaks “ water but it breaks down water to H2 gas and O2 gas and would just bubble out of the tank. Also you’re logic about adding hydrogen to increase pH isn’t right. If you add H ions (H+) ions then your pH would decrease (more acidic). And there are studies that investigates the health benefits of adding H2 gas to drinking water, which is pretty interesting. But, I don’t know how it would affect marine organisms?
 

Jubei2006

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
640
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Hickory
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ever see a plug react to saltwater going in it? What if someone forgets and sticks their bare hand into said tank woth electrolysis going on? Say a kid? And chlorine gas if enough is released could kill more than just the tank. Just use kalk or sodium bicarb and call it a day
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,517
Reaction score
10,048
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the thread. It's fun knowing why a bad idea is bad. :)
I usually learn a lot from my bad ideas, thanks for sharing yours.
 

fachatga

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Messages
989
Reaction score
1,493
Location
oak park
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The product is hydrogen gas, H2, not H+. :)

It might lead to a big fire when it explodes, but it won't alter pH. :)

Both the fact that H2 doesn't impact pH, and burns faster than almost anything are reasons to not simply add H2 from any other source.
Can I guess that the smoke from the resulting fire will lower ph?

I love these conversations. Getting real answers to questions is amazing to have in this hobby.
 

Fusion in reefing: How do you feel about grafted corals?

  • I strongly prefer grafted corals and I seek them out to put in my tank.

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • I find grafted corals appealing and would be open to having them in my tank.

    Votes: 47 54.7%
  • I am indifferent about grafted corals and am not enthusiastic about having them in my tank.

    Votes: 26 30.2%
  • I have reservations about grafted corals and would generally avoid having them in my tank.

    Votes: 7 8.1%
  • I have a negative perception and would avoid having grafted corals in my tank.

    Votes: 3 3.5%
Back
Top