- Joined
- May 14, 2012
- Messages
- 6,696
- Reaction score
- 8,294
Hello R2R,
I personally have had to wait over a week for a replacement part on a skimmer to be shipped under warranty exchange, feel this method would avoid that problem.
All things being equal, and in a perfect world no hardware issues/failures ever (yeah right), would you all think it better to run redundant or even multiple (2, 3, or more) skimmers?
The skimmers would be identical in size and capacities, located close together in the same area of the sump (if internal), and be sized by half or less of the manufactures recommendations but would give you +1 skimming combined. This would mitigating the loss of one, allowing minimal skimming until a replacement has been vetted.
I personally have had to wait over a week for a replacement part on a skimmer to be shipped under warranty exchange, feel this method would avoid that problem.
All things being equal, and in a perfect world no hardware issues/failures ever (yeah right), would you all think it better to run redundant or even multiple (2, 3, or more) skimmers?
The skimmers would be identical in size and capacities, located close together in the same area of the sump (if internal), and be sized by half or less of the manufactures recommendations but would give you +1 skimming combined. This would mitigating the loss of one, allowing minimal skimming until a replacement has been vetted.