So, I am not trying to instigate a fight or battle, but I will offer this point of view.
In this hobby, we too many times offer our experiences or what we believe to be science as absolute fact. We all should stop offering these huge, sweeping, and concrete words of advice about stuff that may not be true. In biology and medicine (and this applies for my colleagues in veterinary medicine), there is no such thing as an absolute! And I mean there are NO absolutes. If you look in this very blog/forum, there are a host of posts from people who have systems w/ livestock that have been QTed for months at a time, and they all of a sudden have an outbreak out of the blue w/ no new additions in years. And if it's truly just a parasite of captive fish, it should be a cycle that is all too easy to break. Even more, there are way TOO MANY posts from people who say the only cures for ICH are fresh water dips and cooper. However, Naphthoquinone (the active ingredient in ICH Attack) has been well documented to cure ICH in peer-reviewed, blinded, emperical study. In fact, it is so good at killing single celled parasites like ICH, it is also currently being studied as a cure in humans for malaria (also a single celled parasite).
So what I am saying is that we should stop telling those of us who are young to this hobby (such as myself) all of these absolutes which are more based in mythology and tradition, rather than fact and science... But even as my little post would allude, this is just my belief... b/c remember, there is no such thing as an absolute in biology! :nerd:
So yes, I do indeed believe that ICH is present in all systems. B/c for me, it doesn't make biological sense that it could be any other way.
Love these conversaitions!
Cheers, folks! Continue to press on!
You kinda contradicted yourself when you said "there is no such thing as absolute!" "We should stop offering these...concrete statements.", but you continued on to agree with an absolute statement,..that ich is in all of our systems.
Also, how does it make biological sense for it to be in all systems? As you said, "is no such thing as absolute in biology". Sure, people may have had a spontaneous outbreak after quarantined new arrivals, cooking dry rock, etc., but that does NOT mean the ich was their from day one. This is a microscopic parasite; therefore, it is nearly impossible to determine when it was introduced. Who's to say it was not seen on an infected fish after quarantine?, or the dips were not preformed properly? How do we know the quarantine, or dip were successful? Just because you can't see it, dosen't mean its not there (this could be said for both sides). This hobby is not an exact science. We use info gained from the internet and apply it to our own tanks. A lot of it is guess work, trial and error.. ..again, although inductive logic is used throughout the life sciences, it is not a very strong argument to stand on. It only takes ONE tank without ich to destroy your theory.
Last edited: