Getting 0 on my ulr phosphorus checker

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Tommy's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Messages
1,107
Reaction score
477
Location
Conroe TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is this possible, I run gfo, water changes, have a good skimmer a refugium. No algae really.
Is there a way to test it I have 2 different batch solutions with different dates.
Has anyone else had this?
Am I running with no phosphates?
 
OP
OP
Tommy's Reef

Tommy's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Messages
1,107
Reaction score
477
Location
Conroe TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yall get 0. Wene testing with ultra low range phosphorus Hanna checker?
How does your reef survive?
 

Mindi

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
200
Reaction score
135
Location
Mornington, Victoria Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
By using Phosphate as it becomes available before the testing process can see it...you are really testing residual phosphate not ALL phosphate. Some significant amount gets consumed before the tests see it.
 

Hanna Instruments

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
373
Reaction score
460
Location
Woonsocket, Rhode Island
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is this possible, I run gfo, water changes, have a good skimmer a refugium. No algae really.
Is there a way to test it I have 2 different batch solutions with different dates.
Has anyone else had this?
Am I running with no phosphates?
All scientific instrumentation have accuracy statement as well. Our HI736 ULR Phosphorus Checker has an accuracy statement of ±5 ppb ±5% of reading, this means your phosphate level can be as high as 5ppb or 0.015ppm.
 

Keeping it clean: Have you used a filter roller?

  • I currently use a filter roller.

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • I don’t currently use a filter roller, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 6 3.4%
  • I have never used a filter roller, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 47 26.9%
  • I have never used a filter roller and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 4.6%
Back
Top