Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I understand your hesitance. There are certainly risks. Everything has risks. Water changes have risks. Knowing how to perform them correctly reduces those risks. Same goes for Lanthanum Chloride dosing. IMO, there is no better way to deal with very high phosphates in a big tank. It is safe when done correctly, inexpensive, and effective. It might be worth reading up on. It is a great tool to have in the bag.I’ve heard about the Lanthanum Chloride but most say it us risky not really trying to take that chance as far as the cheatogro didn’t know it had phosphate in it gonna do a water change and see where that gets me
I would say that in system that developed a fair diverse biome will use a lot of phosphates, systems that are bacteria driven will also use plenty of phosphates. In my opinion I wouldn’t always blame the rock for the rapid depletion of phosphates wend it could just be you tank biome trying to grow.Is it safe to assume that after 12+ months if serious feeding, something else strips po4 very fast to undetectable levels, or is it still possible to "blame" rock?
Pool supply store or on the internet.Where do I purchase it?
Binding of phosphate to a surface would probably never yield 0 ppm of phosphate. It would reach equilibrium somewhere in the positive range. The bound phosphate would then leach back into the water column as the "Biome" consumed that in the water column. Given that, without some input, phosphates would get to 0 some day. However, there is usually some input that delays that day.I would say that in system that developed a fair diverse biome will use a lot of phosphates, systems that are bacteria driven will also use plenty of phosphates. In my opinion I wouldn’t always blame the rock for the rapid depletion of phosphates wend it could just be you tank biome trying to grow.
I am of a similar thought, if it’s a matter of equilibrium between the rock and the water column.Binding of phosphate to a surface would probably never yield 0 ppm of phosphate. It would reach equilibrium somewhere in the positive range. The bound phosphate would then leach back into the water column as the "Biome" consumed that in the water column. Given that, without some input, phosphates would get to 0 some day. However, there is usually some input that delays that day.
Sorry to be necropost but I am experiencing a similar PO4 uptake in my tank that started 10months ago with dry rock/live sand. Basically you’re saying that if I add say .1ppm worth of Neophos and my tank used say .07ppm daily I’d had a net of .03ppm that would stay in my water column? And as long as I dose that amount regularly and consistently my tank would stabilize it’s readout? Just trying to get a solid understanding, currently losing my 2nd favia frag and now 2 stylo frags.I am of a similar thought, if it’s a matter of equilibrium between the rock and the water column.
I’m not sure if I mentioned earlier in this thread that it’s not only the rock that will absorb phosphates, all organisms in our systems have a phosphates demand, i for example had a large demand for phosphates as I started to promote diversity, there is a hole microscopic ecosystem that is dependent on Phosphates.Sorry to be necropost but I am experiencing a similar PO4 uptake in my tank that started 10months ago with dry rock/live sand. Basically you’re saying that if I add say .1ppm worth of Neophos and my tank used say .07ppm daily I’d had a net of .03ppm that would stay in my water column? And as long as I dose that amount regularly and consistently my tank would stabilize it’s readout? Just trying to get a solid understanding, currently losing my 2nd favia frag and now 2 stylo frags.
Right, so basically what we measure with out testers is the free PO4 after everything in our tabkutilizes what it needs essentially, so I have to surpass whatever equilibrium is in my tank and then be consistent with said dosage and I’ll start to have measurable readings. I will be switching from salifert to a Hanna ULR tester as I’m tired of trying to read shades of blue/white so that should help as wellI’m not sure if I mentioned earlier in this thread that it’s not only the rock that will absorb phosphates, all organisms in our systems have a phosphates demand, i for example had a large demand for phosphates as I started to promote diversity, there is a hole microscopic ecosystem that is dependent on Phosphates.
What I’ve done and still do is to just run phosphates a little higher than most reefs, in my case I just keep it around 0.08 - 0.1 there’s no much difference and it just ensures that phosphates don’t get depleted.Right, so basically what we measure with out testers is the free PO4 after everything in our tabkutilizes what it needs essentially, so I have to surpass whatever equilibrium is in my tank and then be consistent with said dosage and I’ll start to have measurable readings. I will be switching from salifert to a Hanna ULR tester as I’m tired of trying to read shades of blue/white so that should help as well
I firmly believe that any reading above 0 indicates that there is enough of a given nutrient in the system. Look to food and trace elements if your corals are looking wimpy. For many corals, organic carbon is food. Others need some fine particulate organics. Other just need more light. All need enough flow to deliver those foods to them and/or take away wastes. Corals need nutrients, food, and a certain mix of trace elements (plus alk, ca, and mg for some) to flourish. The trace elements come from water changes or dosing.i usually kept them no higher than 0.06 still shaking my head trying to not chase numbers but some of the corals are looking like crap need to find a solution that can keep them steady