Reef Chemistry Puzzle #8

KrisReef

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
11,721
Reaction score
27,587
Location
ADX Florence
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I had a feeling it was an organism...


But wait, this a chemistry forum! :confused-face:
Yup, Pods wouldn't show up on a TDS until perhaps they exploded from immersion in fresh( pH 7) water?
Fire Fail GIF
I love chemistry! :smiling-face-with-sunglasses:
 
OP
OP
Miami Reef

Miami Reef

Clam Fanatic
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
11,201
Reaction score
20,814
Location
Miami Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
First, honorable mention to CO2. That definitely can fit the 2 criteria.

Many organisms in a reef tank can consume CO2. As a gas or solid, it won’t have any tds, but it will in water at pH 7.

The answer I was looking for was Acetic Acid (Vinegar)

Quote from @Randy Holmes-Farley
Acetic acid liquid won’t impact tds. Vinegar will have some tds because a small amount of the acetic acid splits into acetate and H+ [the acetic acid form, which comprises the great majority of acetic acid/acetate in vinegar doesn’t impact tds]

Here’s some info about organisms and acetate:

FWIW, the degradation of organics is a big process in the ocean, and is entirely natural. Acetate (the organic in vinegar) is thought to be the largest turnover organic in the ocean, and may be the most common organic in sediment pore water.

Acetate has many uses in organisms.

It can be oxidized with O2 to give energy plus CO2 and bicarbonate.

it can also be used as a building block to make larger biomolecules. Fatty acids are made from acetate as a building block, for example.

Here's a typical paper that shows corals can take up acetate:


"Coral tips and isolated zooxanthellae were incubated with sodium acetate-1-14C in light and dark to obtain lipogenic rates and proportions of fatty acids and lipid classes synthesized. The rate of lipid synthesis from acetate-1-14C by intact coral was stimulated three-fold in the light (1200 lux), which indicated that the majority of coral lipogenesis occurred in the zooxanthellae. Intact coral triglycerides contained ca. 68% of the 14C-activity and wax esters ca. 21%."


Sponges, bacteria, and corals can consume acetate.

Thanks for playing, everyone!


And thank you @Randy Holmes-Farley for letting me have fun with this one. :)
 

Raul-7

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Messages
311
Reaction score
337
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As conductivity meters in disguise, TDS meters will only detect mobile charged ions. They will not detect any neutral (uncharged) compounds. Such compounds include sugar, alcohol, many organics (including many pesticides and their residues), and unionized forms of silica, ammonia, and carbon dioxide.


I was actually thinking about Ethanol or Acetate since both are commonly dosed in reef aquaria. But then went with CO2. :)


But thanks for the challenging question.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,964
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
First, honorable mention to CO2. That definitely can fit the 2 criteria.

Many organisms in a reef tank can consume CO2. As a gas or solid, it won’t have any tds, but it will in water at pH 7.

The answer I was looking for was Acetic Acid (Vinegar)

Quote from @Randy Holmes-Farley


Here’s some info about organisms and acetate:








Sponges, bacteria, and corals can consume acetate.

Thanks for playing, everyone!


And thank you @Randy Holmes-Farley for letting me have fun with this one. :)
Did I miss the explanation about the TDS? Because I'm not sure about that. Acetate has to have a partner. Acetate will not be seen with a TDS monitor at any pH. But its perhaps semantics.
 
OP
OP
Miami Reef

Miami Reef

Clam Fanatic
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
11,201
Reaction score
20,814
Location
Miami Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did I miss the explanation about the TDS? Because I'm not sure about that. Acetate has to have a partner. Acetate will not be seen with a TDS monitor at any pH. But its perhaps semantics.
I can only give quotes by Randy and hope he’ll pop in to explain more.

Acetic acid isn't charged either, but in water at pH 7 it will dissociate into acetate and H+, both of which conduct and would be detected:

CH3CO2H --> CH3CO2- + H+
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,964
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I can only give quotes by Randy and hope he’ll pop in to explain more.
Interesting - since H2O also disassociates into H+ and OH- = I'm assuming that thats why pH7 is important. Agree - awaiting Randy's opinion:)
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,416
Reaction score
63,765
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did I miss the explanation about the TDS? Because I'm not sure about that. Acetate has to have a partner. Acetate will not be seen with a TDS monitor at any pH. But its perhaps semantics.

Acetic acid, CH3CO2H, cannot be detected by a conductivity (TDS) meter since it is uncharged. Thus, dropping a conductivity meter into a bottle of pure acetic acid will show no conductivity.

In water at pH 7, acetic acid will exist mostly as acetate, CH3CO2-, which will show on a conductivity meter.

In vinegar, at a pH in the 2's, there is some conductivity from some acetic acid dissociating into acetate and H+ (which is why the pH is low), but the vast majority of it exists as uncharged acetic acid.

The point where there are an equal number of acetic acid and acetate molecules is just under pH 5. That pH value is called the pKa. Strong acids have a lower pKa and weaker acids have a higher pKa. Many acids we are familial with (such as HCL/muriatic acid) have a pKa well below zero, while some weak acids, such as the hydroxy group on the ring of the amino acid tryrosine have a pKa above 10.

As to other possible answers, neither ethanol nor carbon (just carbon) won't be detectable by TDS at pH 7 in water.

Water is a little trickier, but would not be detectable by any hobby TDS meter at pH 7. There is a tiny amount of H+ and OH- formed in water at pH 7, and it can be detected by conductivity meters designed for that purpose (those intended to verify the purity of extremely pure water), but that value is far, far below what any normal TDS meter can detect, and in point of fact, such meters never read in TDS units. They read in megaohms of resistivity.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,964
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Acetic acid, CH3CO2H, cannot be detected by a conductivity (TDS) meter since it is uncharged. Thus, dropping a conductivity meter into a bottle of pure acetic acid will show no conductivity.

In water at pH 7, acetic acid will exist mostly as acetate, CH3CO2-, which will show on a conductivity meter.

In vinegar, at a pH in the 2's, there is some conductivity from some acetic acid dissociating into acetate and H+ (which is why the pH is low), but the vast majority of it exists as uncharged acetic acid.

The point where there are an equal number of acetic acid and acetate molecules is just under pH 5. That pH value is called the pKa. Strong acids have a lower pKa and weaker acids have a higher pKa. Many acids we are familial with (such as HCL/muriatic acid) have a pKa well below zero, while some weak acids, such as the hydroxy group on the ring of the amino acid tryrosine have a pKa above 10.

As to other possible answers, neither ethanol nor carbon (just carbon) won't be detectable by TDS at pH 7 in water.

Water is a little trickier, but would not be detectable by any hobby TDS meter at pH 7. There is a tiny amount of H+ and OH- formed in water at pH 7, and it can be detected by conductivity meters designed for that purpose (those intended to verify the purity of extremely pure water), but that value is far, far below what any normal TDS meter can detect, and in point of fact, such meters never read in TDS units. They read in megaohms of resistivity.
Thanks - this was my understanding - one followup - so, in reality - at nearly any pH (not specifically 7) - acetic acid will not be detectable by ph. Without a buffer, how would acetic acid exist at pH 7?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,416
Reaction score
63,765
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks - this was my understanding - one followup - so, in reality - at nearly any pH (not specifically 7) - acetic acid will not be detectable by ph. Without a buffer, how would acetic acid exist at pH 7?

Acetic acid itself cannot ever be directly detected by conductivity. Only the conjugate base can be detected that way. They are, however, in nearly instantaneous equilibrium, so uncharged acetic acid does impact TDS in the sense that it necessarily impacts the charged form concentration that is directly detected.

At pH 7, in fresh water with a little salt in it, where the pKa is about 4.8, there is about 158 times as much acetate as acetic acid. That is determined by the Hendersen Hasselbach equation, and there are actually online calculators for it. All you need to know if the Ka (or pKa) and the pH.


In reef tank water, the pKa will be lower due to the ions stabilizing acetate relative to acetic acid, but I'm not sure by how much. Even assuming it is not lower, there is 2500 times as much acetate as acetic acid at pH 8.2.

I'm not sure what you are asking in the second sentence, but without any other buffer (recognizing that the acetate/acetic acid pair is itself a buffer), if you add 1 molar part of acetic acid and 158 molar parts of sodium acetate, the pH will be about 7 and there will be acetic acid present.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,964
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Acetic acid itself cannot ever be directly detected by conductivity. Only the conjugate base can be detected that way. They are, however, in nearly instantaneous equilibrium, so uncharged acetic acid does impact TDS in the sense that it necessarily impacts the charged form concentration that is directly detected.

At pH 7, in fresh water with a little salt in it, where the pKa is about 4.8, there is about 158 times as much acetate as acetic acid. That is determined by the Hendersen Hasselbach equation, and there are actually online calculators for it. All you need to know if the Ka (or pKa) and the pH.


In reef tank water, the pKa will be lower due to the ions stabilizing acetate relative to acetic acid, but I'm not sure by how much. Even assuming it is not lower, there is 2500 times as much acetate as acetic acid at pH 8.2.

I'm not sure what you are asking in the second sentence, but without any other buffer (recognizing that the acetate/acetic acid pair is itself a buffer), if you add 1 molar part of acetic acid and 158 molar parts of sodium acetate, the pH will be about 7 and there will be acetic acid present.
Thanks - the comment related more to the question as to whether the pH of 7 was important to the question, as compared to a pH of 6 or 8 (I was trying to get my head around whether Acetate would be measured at those levels. Thanks for the answer
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,416
Reaction score
63,765
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks - the comment related more to the question as to whether the pH of 7 was important to the question, as compared to a pH of 6 or 8 (I was trying to get my head around whether Acetate would be measured at those levels. Thanks for the answer

pH is important, but the exact value is not. All values above 2 are certainly the same. At low enough pH, there will be virtually no acetate and no detectable impact on TDS. For example, combine equal parts hardware store muriatic acid and vinegar. The acetic acid in that low pH will have no detectable impact on conductivity since there will be no significant amount of acetate.
 

Reefing threads: Do you wear gear from reef brands?

  • I wear reef gear everywhere.

    Votes: 33 16.2%
  • I wear reef gear primarily at fish events and my LFS.

    Votes: 11 5.4%
  • I wear reef gear primarily for water changes and tank maintenance.

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • I wear reef gear primarily to relax where I live.

    Votes: 27 13.2%
  • I don’t wear gear from reef brands.

    Votes: 119 58.3%
  • Other.

    Votes: 13 6.4%
Back
Top