Anyone else successful with cleaner wrasse long term?

OP
OP
4FordFamily

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,434
Reaction score
47,542
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Does anyone know of any studies on the makeup of fish slime? It would be interesting if a specific replacement food could be found based on its nutrition.

My guess is that soaking food in fish oil is a great replacement, or live black worms
 

eatbreakfast

Fish Nerd
View Badges
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,837
Reaction score
16,238
Location
CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
...That's much higher (50/50) than I've ever heard anyone attest to (not debating; I just find that observation interesting). Sure, I'm intentionally exaggerating with "Think 0.1%", but I hate to see people buying this species without knowing what they're up against. It's such an attractive species it easily catches people's eyes, and then the price is usually just as attractive... Not a good recipe.

To be honest this has been my own observations, probably mot enough quantity to be anything but anecdotal. Conversely, I have seen enough L. dimidiatus from Philippines and Indonesia come through that success with fish from these regions is reasonable to expect.


But is this really something to do with Hawaiian fish, or just the fish which are regularly collected in Hawaii? We could counter this with plenty of other examples of Hawaiian fish which are conversely easy to keep. Not to derail the topic, because this topic certainly could! :)

I would like to explore that more, another time, because that is an interesting dynamic.

In my experience and from what I have read, cleaner wrasse rarely if ever eat ich. Ich cleared up because the fish were healthy, eating well, and not stressed. IMO ich is not a big deal if your fish are established, healthy, in a healthy environment with lots of flow, and not fragile species. I am rarely if ever concerned about ich.

Ich clearing up after adding a cleaner wrasse was merely a coincidence. IMO IME

While cleaner wrasses themselves do not consume many of the actual ich parasites, the cleaning behavior does help fish be more resistant to being infected. The slime coat is the first defense against parasites and disease, followed by the scales of the fish. When the slime coat is not healthy or there are dead or demaged scales it is much easier for parasites to infect, and their trophonts to reinfect a fish. The process of removing dead and damaged scaleshelps to provide a surface that is dificult for the parasite to penetrate. And even the practice of eating some of the slime coat has been shown to help the fish produce a more even coating of the mucus. So, even though cleaner wrasses do not actually consume the parasite they are helpful for a speedier recovery and overall healthier fish.

Does anyone know of any studies on the makeup of fish slime? It would be interesting if a specific replacement food could be found based on its nutrition.

It is described as a mucoprotirn, though I have been unable to find an exact makeup.
 

TJ's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
2,454
Reaction score
289
Location
Everett, WA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
TJ and Hunter, on the questions regarding fragile nature of some Hawaiian Fish I from my own personal observations in Hawaii am inclined to think that a couple factors may play a roll in this.

~ #1 Specific Gravity, having measured from several locations the avg off Beach/Reef readings were between 1.0275 --> 1.0285 which are much higher than I would have believed, even inside Pearl Harbor at 1.027+. Does the reduced S.G. also reduce the Fishes slime coat production/protection ???
~ #2 Nutrient level or lack there of in most offshore collection locations, giving indigenous species little tolerance to built up levels within most crowded Trans-shipper/Wholesaler holding systems. ^Above^ mentioned possible lack of slime coat production.

Also seems similar issues to some Red Sea Fish species and may be due to same factors.... I don't know for certain but certainly food for thought.


Cheers, Todd
 

ca1ore

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
13,913
Reaction score
19,762
Location
Stamford, CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While cleaner wrasses themselves do not consume many of the actual ich parasites, the cleaning behavior does help fish be more resistant to being infected. The slime coat is the first defense against parasites and disease, followed by the scales of the fish. When the slime coat is not healthy or there are dead or demaged scales it is much easier for parasites to infect, and their trophonts to reinfect a fish. The process of removing dead and damaged scaleshelps to provide a surface that is dificult for the parasite to penetrate. And even the practice of eating some of the slime coat has been shown to help the fish produce a more even coating of the mucus. So, even though cleaner wrasses do not actually consume the parasite they are helpful for a speedier recovery and overall healthier fish.

Is this conjecture on your part. or is there linkable research? Not saying what you post is wrong, necessarily; just that I have heard arguments to the contrary.

FWIW, I have not found the cleaner wrasse to be hard to keep long-term - maybe just dumb luck, dunno.
 

eatbreakfast

Fish Nerd
View Badges
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,837
Reaction score
16,238
Location
CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is this conjecture on your part. or is there linkable research? Not saying what you post is wrong, necessarily; just that I have heard arguments to the contrary.

FWIW, I have not found the cleaner wrasse to be hard to keep long-term - maybe just dumb luck, dunno.

I am unable to link the info, but if you search via google scholar about cryptocaryon irritans and mucus you will find all sorts of published scientific work on the role that the mucus coating has on the importance of fish health and immunity. Also if you search via google scholar Labroides you will find a lot of scientific research regarding their diet as well as the overall health of fish that are able to utilize their services. It is combining the info from these queries that allows for basis of that statement.

I happen to know of a particular "authority" on another forum that strongly states that cleaner wrasses do not do anything for ich and other parasites, and while protozoan parasites are a negligeable part of their diet, they do benefit the overall health of other fish.
 

ca1ore

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
13,913
Reaction score
19,762
Location
Stamford, CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I happen to know of a particular "authority" on another forum that strongly states that cleaner wrasses do not do anything for ich and other parasites, and while protozoan parasites are a negligeable part of their diet, they do benefit the overall health of other fish.

Hah. Do you not think he is an authority then? :) Personally, I have found the cleaner wrasse to have no affect on reducing the incidence of ich. I was questioning whether (in our tank) the actions of said cleaner fish would help or hinder the ability to resist a ich infection. More intellectual curiosity than anything else.
 

eatbreakfast

Fish Nerd
View Badges
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,837
Reaction score
16,238
Location
CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hah. Do you not think he is an authority then? :) Personally, I have found the cleaner wrasse to have no affect on reducing the incidence of ich. I was questioning whether (in our tank) the actions of said cleaner fish would help or hinder the ability to resist a ich infection. More intellectual curiosity than anything else.

An authority in some respects, but not all.

As far as the benefits of cleaners in aquaria, I do find it interesting and noteworthy that in "healthy" systems fish utilize their services and in LFS when a cleaner wrasse is added to a tank fish literally line up waiting to be cleaned. I feel that other fish would not be so determined to utilize these services if it was of no benefit.
 
OP
OP
4FordFamily

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,434
Reaction score
47,542
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
TJ and Hunter, on the questions regarding fragile nature of some Hawaiian Fish I from my own personal observations in Hawaii am inclined to think that a couple factors may play a roll in this.

~ #1 Specific Gravity, having measured from several locations the avg off Beach/Reef readings were between 1.0275 --> 1.0285 which are much higher than I would have believed, even inside Pearl Harbor at 1.027+. Does the reduced S.G. also reduce the Fishes slime coat production/protection ???
~ #2 Nutrient level or lack there of in most offshore collection locations, giving indigenous species little tolerance to built up levels within most crowded Trans-shipper/Wholesaler holding systems. ^Above^ mentioned possible lack of slime coat production.

Also seems similar issues to some Red Sea Fish species and may be due to same factors.... I don't know for certain but certainly food for thought.


Cheers, Todd
Interesting that you mention that - I have noticed that keeping my tanks saltier than necessary has benefited many Hawaiian fish such as the Achilles tang. I believe 1.026-1.0285 is the necessary range for optimal health of that fish in particular. In my experience, and I a few veterans that have been doing this far longer than me and kept Achilles far longer than I have.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
4FordFamily

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,434
Reaction score
47,542
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Watching one of mine eat nori as we speak. Very strange..
 

Mike&Terry

Wrasses, Angels, & Tangs, Oh My!
View Badges
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
6,124
Reaction score
1,835
Location
Chesterfield, VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Watching one of mine eat nori as we speak. Very strange..

LOL... Gotta love those learned feeding behaviors! All of our fish (except the Kaudern's Cardinal) eat nori off the clip - including our clowns and 5 chromis.
 
OP
OP
4FordFamily

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,434
Reaction score
47,542
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
LOL... Gotta love those learned feeding behaviors! All of our fish (except the Kaudern's Cardinal) eat nori off the clip - including our clowns and 5 chromis.


All of my wrasse and other fish will eat nori except for a candy cane squirrel and a Bangai Cardinal. So odd
 

babyjess210

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
78
Reaction score
57
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My cleaner wrasse is going on 5 years and eats frozen food, nori, flakes and pellets but still perform his "job" and cleans the fish in my tank.
 

MattL22

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
1,589
Reaction score
37
Location
Longisland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have 1 about a yr when I got it was tiny and thin swore it wouldn't make it but has proven to be pretty hardy for me and great for the tank at certain hrs u can see fish waiting for him to clean pretty cool !! I do have a lg tank 220 with lots of fish and 4-5 pretty big fish I often thought that might be the key with these so they r able to get what they need in their diet from the fish and supplement the rest with mysis etc
 

dcarrion144

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well a cleaner wrasse was definitely a fish I was going to get for my 40 gallon breeder but after this discussion I found I'd probably upset my fish with an annoying fish like this. Mainly cuz I don't have big fish in the tank. It would probAbly stress all the other fish. Lol thanks for talking me out of bringing the annoying smelly kid to class
 
OP
OP
4FordFamily

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,434
Reaction score
47,542
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lol^
 

jen2828

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
105
Reaction score
56
Location
Hershey, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
We've had ours for 7 years now...we had another in another reef tank we lost after 8 years because an accident during our move :-(
 

Just grow it: Have you ever added CO2 to your reef tank?

  • I currently use a CO2 with my reef tank.

    Votes: 8 7.0%
  • I don’t currently use CO2 with my reef tank, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 4 3.5%
  • I have never used CO2 with my reef tank, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 5 4.4%
  • I have never used CO2 with my reef tank and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 92 80.7%
  • Other.

    Votes: 5 4.4%
Back
Top