I run my system at 1.029 [ ! ]

OP
OP
Berlibee

Berlibee

.Wen Game.
View Badges
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
1,852
Reaction score
2,895
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes, but still the results with 1.028 are good as well so it's not only about that battle Probe vs Refractometer.
 

Jlobes

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
5,997
Reaction score
1,250
Location
Behind the redwood curtain
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
perhaps it "not about the battle", but through much of this thread you have been claiming and reiterating that refrac. are untrustworthy and unreliable, even suggesting that we run our systems at a low SG due to refractometers. My point is and has been, that they are quite the opposite and should be used to measure/check other devices ie:probes. now we know, and knowing is half the battle.

happy reefing.
 
OP
OP
Berlibee

Berlibee

.Wen Game.
View Badges
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
1,852
Reaction score
2,895
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Man with all my respect. So I don't know why you still think that I'm claiming something ... or you just trolling. :)
I was asking and questioning the process not claiming something and I've explained this several time and did a super-mega-special post especially for you before to explain this. :)

Do you accept everything in your live that is a "Standard", you never questioning something ... ? This is why our hobby is interesting.
 

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,131
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for taking the time and money to confirm it.

I was kind of hoping the conductvity was right. :)
 
OP
OP
Berlibee

Berlibee

.Wen Game.
View Badges
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
1,852
Reaction score
2,895
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well no need to make that Shamanic Calibration Ceremonies anymore .... :D Well at least not so often hehehe...
 

reeferfoxx

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
6,511
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My Apologies. I was under the impression that 1.029 was improving coral health and growth. The argument was that people didn't believe it. You proved that the Apex probe was incorrect. However, I feel like the original point is being ignored now. Knowing you were running your tank higher than 1.027, seemingly resulted in lowering your salinity back down to 1.026. Was there a reason why you wanted to lower the salinity?
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Please help me read your results. Where does it indicate that your specific gravity is 1.028-1.029?
He used my spreadsheet to calculate salinity, and inferred a SG from that. The results he posted here show a salinity of 36.61, which translates into a SG of 1.0276 at 25C.
 
Last edited:

zoomonster

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,542
Reaction score
1,613
Location
Central Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Again as I have said in other threads the Apex probe is the culprit and you should have trusted the refractometer (if it was properly zeroed). Said it too many times, here and elsewhere, and not going to say it all again but your probe is susceptible to micro bubbles which lowers the readings sometimes significantly. Fortunately I trusted the refractometer right from the start and then got to the bottom of the issue with the probe. Micro bubbles out of the way, for the most part, the probe has matched by refractometer close to last two years. I still on rare occasion need to swirl it around to remove any bubbles.
 

fab

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
468
Reaction score
241
Location
Alexandria, Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So is the s.g. calculated from the cells that contain s(pss78)=36.61 and g/kg = 36.784 ?

@JimWelsh I saw your posting after I posted this one. I got it now. Thank you.
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So is the s.g. calculated from the cells that contain s(pss78)=36.61 and g/kg = 36.784 ?
No. Seawater that has a salinity of S=35.00 according to the PSS-78 standard actually has about 35.165 g/kg of solutes in it. That conversion factor means that 36.784 / 35.165 * 35.00 = 36.61. The conversion of a salinity into specific gravity is done using the formulas found in The Equation of State of Seawater.
 

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
48,323
Reaction score
91,191
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Back
Top