Here's what ChatGPT gave me. I've used it extensively to program apex. Double check it through by running it through your own AI (and prompt it to "audit" the response once or twice. With apex programming, ChatGPT is rarely correct the first time on complex code.
And my experience of the Trident NP is that it struggles to maintain accuracy and consistency. I believe that is the reason they want us to only run it once per day. I prefer to separate my apex logic from my dosing or other interventions that could cause major harm. For instance, when my Trident ACM runs out of reagent, the values go sky-high.
THE FOLLOWING IS FROM FROM CHATGPT....DO YOUR HOMEWORK PLEASE...DON'T RELY ON ME. Basically they are recommending creating virtual outlets to ascertain the state of certain conditions, then create a trigger to use with your Ozone outlet.
Final recommended implementation
O3_BOOST_NO3
Fallback OFF
Set OFF
If NO3 > 15.0 Then ON
If NO3 < 12.0 Then OFF
O3_BOOST_PO4
Fallback OFF
Set OFF
If PO4 > 0.12 Then ON
If PO4 < 0.08 Then OFF
O3_BOOST
Fallback OFF
Set OFF
If Output O3_BOOST_NO3 = ON Then ON
If Output O3_BOOST_PO4 = ON Then ON
O3_SCHED
Fallback OFF
Set OFF
If Time 23:00 to 23:59 Then ON
If Output O3_BOOST = ON Then OFF
If Time 22:00 to 23:59 Then ON
OZONE
Fallback OFF
Set OFF
If Output O3_SCHED = ON Then ON
If Output Skimmer = OFF Then OFF
If ORP > 375 Then OFF
Engineering assessment
Reliability
Good, assuming the probe names are correct.
Safety
Adequate but not complete. I would consider adding at least one of these:
- disable ozone during feed modes if your skimmer behavior becomes erratic
- disable ozone during PWR_FAIL
- disable ozone during major alarm/emergency state
- possibly require ORP to drop below a lower re-enable point if you want anti-chatter behavior
Your current If ORP > 375 Then OFF is acceptable, but it has
no hysteresis. That may be fine because ozone is already time-limited.
Control quality
Moderate, not high. This is a coarse adaptive schedule, not a true nutrient controller.
My blunt recommendation
I would
not make ozone a primary response to elevated nitrate/phosphate. I would use this only as a
limited polishing adjustment. If NO3/PO4 are high, the main corrective levers are still:
- feeding/import
- skimming/wetness
- refugium performance
- GFO/media
- carbon dosing or other export strategy
- mechanical removal of organics/detritus
Ozone is ancillary here.