I really like what Ryan at
@Bulk Reef Supply says about the topic. He says that no ATO is safe, but with proper safeguards you ATO can be the safest unsafe thing in your house. I thought it was a great point when he said that your fridge ice maker has less flooding protection than a well designed ATO (with a few additional precautions).
It is true that many pieces of hardware in the common household implies a risk: fire hazard with laundry machine, flooding from washing machine or fridge, flooding from clogged sewers, the list goes on.
However, I dont think a lot of people realize how much just 20 gallons of water is on the floor. It is absolutely nuts, and way more than the risk of any other common household hardware. Water damage aint fun. Not to mention saltwater, which is way worse in terms of potential damage than regular freshwater.
Another problem is that the hardware for our tanks need to last while submerged or in proximity to saltwater 24/7. It is not uncommon that this causes failure. For example, water gets into a water level sensor, or algae or bacterial film grows on it, or salt creep will make a float switch useless. Will maintenance fix it? Yes, possibly, but with sensors you might scratch the lense, rendering it ineffective. In general, the biggest risks would be eliminated if for any of these solutions, no hardware can fail in the “on” setting/position, but ONLY off, like a float valve will.
So, yes, some household hardware has less failsafes, but, there is also less implied risk, as it won’t (or atleast shouldn’t) be exposed to such harsh conditions as saltwater.
Also, I dont think many insurance companies will cover damages caused by a tank flooding because of an ATO…
I can think of many risks, but I am also a cybersecurity expert by profession, so maybe thats just my approach :face-with-tears-of-joy: