Automatic top-off/water-change design

  • Thread starter Thread starter cartery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

cartery

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2024
Messages
122
Reaction score
57
Location
Tucson
What state or country do you live in
Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi,

This is maybe more of a thought experiment. I'm not sure I'll actually implement this, or would even want to, but I thought of a design and I'm curious if people think it would work.

If I have a sump with a chamber holding the return pump, my understanding is that evaporation will only change the water level in that chamber. That's why you would put your ATO sensor/float valve in that chamber and not anywhere else.

So my idea was, you make another chamber with another pump and set up a reservoir with saltwater in the same manner as the ATO. You run that secondary pump to a drain or whatever. Then you trigger the secondary pump to lower the level of water in the second chamber which will trigger a refill from the saltwater reservoir, thereby doing a water change.

I'm thinking you'd probably need to pause the primary/return pump when running the secondary, at least to avoid triggering the ATO.

Does this make sense? No idea if it'd be worth doing, but I thought it was fun to mull over.
 
Alternately

And this is how I currently doing mine

Turn off the ATO, turn off the protein skimmer, turn off the in sump reactor, turn off the pump to the algae reactor, turn off the filter mat

Turn on the waterchange pump, pump out 5 gallons

Return 5 gallons fresh saltwater

Turn everything back on, except ATO

Fill with fresh saltwater to ATO level

Turn on ATO

Sounds complicated, but I just use a WiFi controller to push button all the devices

1000003469.jpg


Eventually when I get the controller all set up, that will be one press

But invariably, when you do simultaneous water exchange, you are tossing out, down the drain, a small percentage of fresh saltwater. I don't know why, but that bothers me, I know it shouldn't
 
The approach your using is different in that it's not simultaneous, right? But otherwise very similar to what I'm saying?
 
You've added an extra chamber to your sump*

That I don't have

(*Hypothetical sump?)
Oh, gotcha. Yeah, hypothetical. I may have to build a mini version and see if what I'm thinking works. I'll follow up here if I learn anything
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHEN PLANNING CORAL PLACEMENT, WHAT USUALLY WINS? THE FUTURE COLONY, OR THE NEXT FRAG?

  • I leave plenty of open space for large future colonies

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • I plan for growth...but occasionally squeeze coral into tight spaces

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • I try to balance future growth with variety now

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • I fit in as many frags as I reasonably can

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • One more frag always wins! Future me can solve the problem...

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends on the coral and how quickly it grows

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • I squeeze 'em in! Survival of the fittest, baby!!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I’m already out of room, so apparently we know my answer...

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new