Best way to transition over to Core7 Base Elements?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is there a formula that's best for the transition?

Exp. Do you want your parameters at a certain number/ level since the Core7 Base Elements contain everything needed to support a reef including major and minor trace elements?

What's the easiest way to do it? 1/4 dose, 1/2 dose full dose from the beginning?

One other question. Do you need to supplement Strontium, manganese, etc...at times or will this solution always balance itself out with the recommended dosing?

Please let me know. I'm ready to start dosing.
 
OP
OP
Reefahholic

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey Jared.

What method are you coming over from?

I'm coming from traditional 2-part dosing. (BRS)

Considering what happen to D2mini's tank...I want to make sure I start slow. Tank has been up for only 2 months.

Here's a pic of the water chemistry and system as of a few days ago. I have high PO4 I think because my dry rock (Walt Smith 2.1) is leaching PO4. Not positive though. I'm working on the macro's in the fuge/ sump area.

AA639DE0-D951-4EE4-9056-E234D254E597_zpsuftwtdeh.jpg


1F4CC2F0-9352-4A2F-AA10-53AE38F2285A_zpslqrw5j1a.png


6AB4D8A0-0936-4D20-8D6C-21A93F8414ED_zpszuxgb3p1.jpg


992026AF-4A49-4814-B731-5899CE7D0616_zpsgdpfrp9g.jpg


E02CC55E-D276-4CDD-8A19-2C8F5E8501E4_zpsgncku99i.jpg


2806C54C-E9F3-4D32-B310-84E7ADA9A546_zps4gkc9gbs.jpg
 

justingraham

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
5,348
Reaction score
6,710
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Following along

I'm starting a fresh tank as well and would like to know how much to dose as well
 

Tim@Triton

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
598
Reaction score
468
Location
Liverpool UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Following along

I'm starting a fresh tank as well and would like to know how much to dose as well

Starting dose is very simple, 2ml per 100L, test regularly and adjust all solutions equally to maintain a KH of around 8.

I'm coming from traditional 2-part dosing. (BRS)

Considering what happen to D2mini's tank...I want to make sure I start slow. Tank has been up for only 2 months.

Here's a pic of the water chemistry and system as of a few days ago. I have high PO4 I think because my dry rock (Walt Smith 2.1) is leaching PO4. Not positive though. I'm working on the macro's in the fuge/ sump area.

Are you replacing all the Siporax and blocks? Have you considered just using the Core7 Reef Supplements? You could leave the system as it is and just replace the dosing....
 
OP
OP
Reefahholic

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I want to keep the Siporax. Will that be an issue for the specific type I bought (Triton Method) with all the trace elements.?

Should I have bought the (Other Methods) without all the trace elements?

Is the difference only for macro algae bed? I know the (Triton Method) I bought has the pro algae elements in it to support the algae bed right.?

I wanted the one with all the trace elements. I felt like the other was lacking important elements.
 

Tim@Triton

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
598
Reaction score
468
Location
Liverpool UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
They both have all essential elements included in them, the only difference is the amounts, the Core7 Base Elements are designed to be used with the Triton Method in which a large algae refugium is used, the pro algae elements are at a higher level in this variety to turbo charge the algae bed. If you are not using a large algae refugium then you may find that some of the pro algae elements are not getting used up by the macro and may then be available for pest algae. This is why we created Core7 Reef Supplements, the elements are the same just the pro algae elements are reduce to prevent the excess....
 
OP
OP
Reefahholic

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I guess I'm a little confused about what it is that differs between the "Triton Method" and "Other Method."

I'm assuming the "Reef Supplements" you're referring to is the one called "Other Method."
 

Tim@Triton

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
598
Reaction score
468
Location
Liverpool UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes

Core7 Base Elements (For use with the Triton Method)
csm_TRITON-Product-BaseElementsCORE7-800px_8496829e6a.jpg

Core7 Reef Supplements (For use with Other Methods)
csm_TRITON-Product-ReefSupplementsCORE7-2500_e643aaefe5.jpg
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Reefahholic

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
They both have all essential elements included in them, the only difference is the amounts, the Core7 Base Elements are designed to be used with the Triton Method in which a large algae refugium is used, the pro algae elements are at a higher level in this variety to turbo charge the algae bed. If you are not using a large algae refugium then you may find that some of the pro algae elements are not getting used up by the macro and may then be available for pest algae. This is why we created Core7 Reef Supplements, the elements are the same just the pro algae elements are reduce to prevent the excess....

Ok, that makes a lot of sense now. How big of an algae bed do you guys run?

Is the algae bed for PO4 removal only? What's it's purpose? I do plan to have several different types of macros. I just don't have them yet because the tank is young. Maybe I'll buy the other method until the algae bed is big enough to receive the extra pro algae elements. I feel like right now it's gonna grow algae in my display. :)
 

Tim@Triton

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
598
Reaction score
468
Location
Liverpool UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
10-20% the display volume but bigger is better, within reason of course.

The algae bed acts as a catalyst for the whole method, and it is the reason that we can run without the need for routine water changes, it deals with nutrients and unwanted elements and also acts as a food source for the corals by way of housing micro fauna which make their way to the display but also through the algae's life cycle of releasing sugars and fatty acids etc back into the water which the corals then feed on. This backed up with PO4 media and activated carbon removing unwanted nutrients/elements/toxins make it the most efficient natural filter and with out it the Triton Method would not work.

But that is the Triton method, if you don't want to adopt the full Triton method and run your own hybrid then you can, but like I say I would go for the Reef Supplements...
 
OP
OP
Reefahholic

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
10-20% the display volume but bigger is better, within reason of course.

The algae bed acts as a catalyst for the whole method, and it is the reason that we can run without the need for routine water changes, it deals with nutrients and unwanted elements and also acts as a food source for the corals by way of housing micro fauna which make their way to the display but also through the algae's life cycle of releasing sugars and fatty acids etc back into the water which the corals then feed on. This backed up with PO4 media and activated carbon removing unwanted nutrients/elements/toxins make it the most efficient natural filter and with out it the Triton Method would not work.

But that is the Triton method, if you don't want to adopt the full Triton method and run your own hybrid then you can, but like I say I would go for the Reef Supplements...

Thanks Tim! That makes total sense to me. I will see if I can go full Triton in the future. As of now and the beginning stages of my tank- I'll just run a hybrid system. I believe It'll be a lot safer until the system can handle the pro algae nutrients.

Thanks for all your help! BTW, I picked up the "Other Method" before work. :D;)

Now I have both. wink wink.;)
 
OP
OP
Reefahholic

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
7,435
Reaction score
6,235
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ohh...while I have you...

I heard it's not recommended to harvest/trim the algae bed and run on a reverse light cycle. Is this the best route to go? At what point do you guys trim? I guess go as long as possible until it starts to die underneath?

Last question...

What types of algae or the best to run in the bed?

From what I understand, it's better to run several different species due to one or two species that may not do so well for whatever reason. That way if one starts dying off, the other will pick up the slack.?

Let me know! Thanks again bro!
 

Tim@Triton

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Messages
598
Reaction score
468
Location
Liverpool UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Harvesting is dependent on your nutrient levels, if they are higher than you would like then you can harvest a bit more often, if they are low then you can harvest less often. There usually comes a point where a healthy algae bed self regulates dependant on level and you can just leave it to do its thing.

And yes as many different species as you can get your hands on, you will find that one or two f them become dominant dependant on the parameters.
 

Keeping it clean: Have you used a filter roller?

  • I currently use a filter roller.

    Votes: 55 32.2%
  • I don’t currently use a filter roller, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 6 3.5%
  • I have never used a filter roller, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 46 26.9%
  • I have never used a filter roller and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 56 32.7%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 4.7%
Back
Top