- Joined
- May 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,786
- Reaction score
- 1,157
I have a Korallin C1502 on my well stocked 3 year old SPS heavy 250 gallon tank, and it works great, except I'm collecting excess CO2 (or air, but I believe CO2). I do use pH as a reference, but but I don't use that for the regulator, I go by my tanks demand. If I am at 8.2 dkH, and ph in the reactor is at 6.7 at 32ml/min, my alk in the tank stays stable. I use the bubbles per second, usually one per 2-3 seconds as a reference which correlates well to the pH probe. But over the course of the day I collect CO2. So my question is, how do I use less CO2, that is absorbed by the admittedly small reactor. If I lower my bubble count it lowers the pH in the reactor and hence my tank's alkalinity drops. Lower flow?
I've read JDA's how to tune with alkalinity, and I believe in theory I'm abiding by the principles, measure output, which is determined by bubble/pH, don't use the dump and store (which I'm not).
I'm refilling the chamber every few weeks, as I find if the chamber isn't right near the intake it seems to collect more CO2 than if it is lower down. I also am using the newer reborn media, which has a fair amount of shells, which I think tend to collect and clog up the flow. Once I change out the media completely it is pretty resilient, but after a month or two I'm back in the same position with collecting a lot of CO2 at the top. Is it just time for a bigger reactor? Thanks
Any help?
I've read JDA's how to tune with alkalinity, and I believe in theory I'm abiding by the principles, measure output, which is determined by bubble/pH, don't use the dump and store (which I'm not).
I'm refilling the chamber every few weeks, as I find if the chamber isn't right near the intake it seems to collect more CO2 than if it is lower down. I also am using the newer reborn media, which has a fair amount of shells, which I think tend to collect and clog up the flow. Once I change out the media completely it is pretty resilient, but after a month or two I'm back in the same position with collecting a lot of CO2 at the top. Is it just time for a bigger reactor? Thanks
Any help?