Calling all you gun lovers!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndz98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
IMO Colt is not worth the money at all, I've never seen any data saying it was any more reliable or accurate. The only differences I know of are that Colts use proprietary trigger group pins that are larger than every other manufacturer, I have heard they were going away from it though.
 
I don't think he is exactly limiting himself to ruger or SW but they are common reputable names in firearm world.

I still propose you build one. you don't have to do a full build but you can get a complete lower with mil spec M4 stock for under 200$ than get a upper assembly and BCG. more like assembling than building but can work out in your favor money wise and astetics wise.
 
New question:

How does the Colt expanse m4 compare to the Ruger ar-556? Is it worth spending 100 bucks more or not really?

Both rifles are identical except for a few things......

1) The Colt's barrel is a 1-7 twist and the Ruger is 1-8 twist. Faster twist rates equate to better shooting of heavier grain loads but the 1-8 will shoot 35 to 77gr bullets. Now in my experience not many shooters choose that light or that heavy of a bullet and they are often not in stock at most retailers and are more expensive. What you will most likely come across is 55gr to 62gr bullets so either rifle will handle them just fine.
2) The Colt will not have a dust cover or push assist. Colt figured the everyday shooter did not need these parts so they left them out to save cost. The holes are drilled into the receiver so you can add them if you wish. The Ruger does have both already installed
3) The Ruger has a proprietary barrel nut and threaded delta ring. This is supposed to better the process of changing out handguards. The downside is it is proprietary but nothing that should cancel a decision to buy.

My conclusion is both will go bang when you pull the trigger, which is what you want, and both will last. Any increase in the Colt's price is due to the name. Both are properly priced for an entry level AR15.
 
I don't think he is exactly limiting himself to ruger or SW but they are common reputable names in firearm world.

I still propose you build one. you don't have to do a full build but you can get a complete lower with mil spec M4 stock for under 200$ than get a upper assembly and BCG. more like assembling than building but can work out in your favor money wise and astetics wise.

I figured that but I was replying to his original post and not the conversation that came after.
 
The sig M400 is a good gun and price is good as well. I have one and also have an M&P AR10 chambered in .308. M&P is a good manufacturer but be careful they have some low end guns made AR-15. Like anything you get what you pay for.
 
I ended up buying this gun this morning and it should be here by Friday if the ffl it was sent to is still open when they try to deliver it. If not I assume they will try to driver Saturday. Either way, it'll be here in time to shoot some bullets for Labor Day weekend!

image.png
 
I ended up buying this gun this morning and it should be here by Friday if the ffl it was sent to is still open when they try to deliver it. If not I assume they will try to driver Saturday. Either way, it'll be here in time to shoot some bullets for Labor Day weekend!

image.png

That's a good deal bud! quad rail upgrade, bipod, scope and a case is a steal at that price. Good buy man.
 
That's a good deal bud! quad rail upgrade, bipod, scope and a case is a steal at that price. Good buy man.
Thanks! I'm really excited to get it. It's like Christmas morning in September lol.
 
ive heard some issues with the S&W stuff lately, don't know how much merit there is to it but that's what ive heard....ive got an FNH FN15 absolutely love it, great price great FN quality and shoots awesome FWIW
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW IMPORTANT ARE FISH TO MAKING A REEF TANK FEEL COMPLETE?

  • Essential! A reef needs fish movement and personality

    Votes: 19 61.3%
  • Very important, but one or two fish may be enough

    Votes: 4 12.9%
  • Optional... a coral-only reef can feel completely finished

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • I actually prefer a coral-and-invertebrate-only system

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends on the tank’s size, style, or purpose

    Votes: 5 16.1%
  • I’ve kept a fishless reef (details in the comments)

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • Well...it's complicated... (answer in the comments)

    Votes: 1 3.2%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new