Cycling light, is that a problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizzman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Fizzman

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have my lights on 3hr and off 1hr for a total of 9hr photo period. Is this bad for corals at all? I do it because of heat issues, it's a really small Pico.
 
I am not an expert, but I believe the algae have a "ramp up" period for photosynthesis. The first period of time (minutes/hours... I am not sure on the details) goes toward charging up the photosystems. Energy isn't really generated until after that period. This means that longer, continuous photoperiods are more efficient (up to a point).
 
From everything that I have read, consistency is key. I guess if the corals are acclimated to this they could be ok. Are there any places on earth that has a weather pattern that blocks out the sun entirely during the day for an hour or two at a time?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 13 28.9%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 6 13.3%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 6 13.3%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 11 24.4%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 20.0%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 4.4%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 4 8.9%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 1 2.2%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new