FOWLR at 1.020?

salty joe

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
664
Location
Medina, Oh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A lot (all?) of vendors keep their fish water at about 1.020.
Is that effective for tamping down parasites over the long haul?
If so, why not run FOWLR tank at 1.020 and forget the risky QT treatment?
 

Indymann99

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
189
Reaction score
305
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
+1 that vendors run low SG due to $$ savings on salt.. when you go through thousands of gallons of water each month a small drop in SG adds up to savings.
HOWEVER this does NOT replace good QT practice.
 

Jesterrace

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 6, 2017
Messages
3,519
Reaction score
2,824
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It can also be to disguise or hide parasites for the time it takes you to buy the fish. Fortunately my LFS runs theirs at 1.025 as they are a coral specialty store.
 
OP
OP
S

salty joe

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
1,071
Reaction score
664
Location
Medina, Oh
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Saving money on salt makes sense.

Honestly 1.020 isn’t going to marginally impact parasites, but I keep my FOWLR 1.021-1.022.

I realize 1.020 won't eliminate parasites but I thought 1.020 was low enough to slow down/mask parasites long enough to make a sale. I can't see how vendors wouldn't have major outbreaks otherwise since as far as I know, they are not treating with copper, etc.-IDK. Am I wrong here?
BTW, why do you keep your FOWLR at less than full strength seawater?
 

4FordFamily

Tang, Angel, and Wrasse Nerd!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Messages
20,508
Reaction score
45,793
Location
Carmel, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Saving money on salt makes sense.



I realize 1.020 won't eliminate parasites but I thought 1.020 was low enough to slow down/mask parasites long enough to make a sale. I can't see how vendors wouldn't have major outbreaks otherwise since as far as I know, they are not treating with copper, etc.-IDK. Am I wrong here?
BTW, why do you keep your FOWLR at less than full strength seawater?
Almost all vendors keep the fish in low level copper and I suspect low level metroplex or another antibiotic. The antibiotic hunch is purely unsubstantiated and the copper is pretty widely accepted/known— to keep them alive long enough to sell.

I keep the FOWLR a bit lower for the cost savings as well, and because it’s just what I’ve always done in a FOWLR. It’s a 500 gallon system so every dollar saved is a good dollar! :)

I also have a 180 and a 34 (Red Sea reefer 170) so I use a lot of salt.
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,342
Reaction score
21,756
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I always found that NSW level tank parameters made for healthier fish and in the end, I spent less. Some species, especially those that live on the reefs, can really suffer in hypo for long... which is different than a quick stay in a QT tank. Also, it was easy to change water from my reef into my FOWLR so that I did not waste much.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top