Regardless how carbon is introduced it makes it to the display quickly. Unless water traveling through the reactor slow enough to be fully utilized by the bacteria using it for conversion of nitrates and sulfur which I'd think would be beyond many's abilities to fine tune that process as we don't have a method of testing carbon with home kits.There was a thread I read where a few users started having STN when they began carbon dosing. It may be coincidental, and dosing into a reactor may not really add any benefit compared to dosing the tank but I don’t mind adding a diy filter.
Also, in the thread started by Donovan he said that his design would help prevent bacteria blooms in the tank and reduce the odds of getting cyano (I don’t know if either of those things are common problems or not with normal carbon dosing).
That's where my skepticism rises and very familiar with the original AquariPure design which relied on a drip to fully utilize denitrification and later it was discovered that carbon direct was quicker since flow no longer mattered. Don't recall exactly what he fed the bacteria but likely some form of carbon or might have been as simple as sugar. Been a while but what deterred me from his design was the restricted flow. No different the coil denitrators of the 80/90s. Needed several based on tank size.
I'll have to go refresh myself on Donovan's design but the biology seems logically to be the same since it's the same design with a new name. Kind of like all the scrubbers based off Adey's design yet don't mention him but perform the same biological function.