Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you! Its a 10 month old system and a work in progress. I just started introducing new wavemakers in order to create better and more random flow but the sand is way too fine. Also the rockwork is one line down the centre and when in gyre mode, it causes 2 valleys either side and the flow is only one direction which my lps and softies don't seem to like so that's why some corals are placed next to the rockwork the end to seek shelter! Once the sand is out I will rescape with more rock, providing more surface area for the flow to collide with. Thats the plan anywayThe tank looked really clean in pics for sure. A very very nice reef! $$
thanks for the good info, very interesting. I've often wondered how for those with DSB who does sand maintenance every 3-4 yrs by siphoning 1/4 sections of tank, that there is no adverse effect vs the OP's PO4 spike after complete sand removal.Here are some of the possible explanations for the PO4 and NO3 increase.
Aragonite sand adsorbs PO4. When you removed it, the system has a smaller PO4 sink and it is accumulating in the water.
The jump in NO3 might be a jump in NO2. When you removed the sand, you removed nitrite oxidizing bacteria. Because these are slow growing bacteria, the system’s NO2 oxidizing capacity is lower and NO2 is accumulating.
If the sand bend had significant denitrifying capacity, the system’s capacity to remove NO3 has been diminished and NO3 are accumulating.
I'm using the H2O ocean test kit which I've used for about a year and it has seamed to give me reliable readings..I think. My readings have always been below 0.03ppm until I raised to 0.16ppm for dino treatment. I'm pretty sure its giving me an accurate reading as it rocketed up after my sand was removed...so it all makes sense.How has the reading been accepted as accurate, asking due to rampant misreads in the hobby curious if this reader is more accurate than most, not found in misread posts etc
About 500 threads exist for this very issue with ammonia, and every one of them is a misread.
That is lanthanum chloride which binds phosphate as a flocculant, the cloudiness in the water. Dangerous to some tangs as it clogs their gills.I'm still struggling to keep the phosphate down as a result of replacing my sand! I am dosing quantum liquid phosphate remover which states to dose 1ml daily per 100l for 0.25ppm concentrations. I have a concentration of 0.2ppm and im dosing double the recommendation and my po4 still creeps up daily!. Its making my water a little cloudy. Shall I simply increase the dose to try to get the po4 down?. I'm concerned as it say not to overdose !
You were right! I bought a hanna ultra low phosphate checker and it reads 0.01 where the other kit reads as high as 0.2!How has the reading been accepted as accurate, asking due to rampant misreads in the hobby curious if this reader is more accurate than most, not found in misread posts etc
About 500 threads exist for this very issue with ammonia, and every one of them is a misread.