Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #217 Elements and Specific Gravity

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,438
Reaction score
63,839
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #217

If I were to add one billion of each of the following ions to a liter of seawater (as, say, the chloride salts), which of them will show the largest increase in the actual specific gravity (i.e., not necessarily what some particular device might measure, but the true specific gravity)?

A. Sodium
B. Potassium
C. Calcium
D. Magnesium
E. Strontium
F. All will be the same

Good luck!










































.
 

reeferfoxx

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
6,511
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
1 - Strontium
2 - Calcium

Since Strontium and Calcium minerals coprecipitate at higher pH and there are equal parts, would those two be the real impact? Seems like a lot of strontium lol
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,438
Reaction score
63,839
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
1 - Strontium
2 - Calcium

Since Strontium and Calcium minerals coprecipitate at higher pH and there are equal parts, would those two be the real impact? Seems like a lot of strontium lol

FWIW, a billon ions in a liter is hardly noticeable. :)
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
1 - Strontium
2 - Calcium

Since Strontium and Calcium minerals coprecipitate at higher pH and there are equal parts, would those two be the real impact? Seems like a lot of strontium lol

Well, since there are 6.022 * 10^23 ions in 1 mole, and only 1 billion ions = 1 * 10^9, then we are only adding around 1.66 BILLIONTHS of a MICROMOLE! Hardly "a lot of strontium"! LOL
 

reeferfoxx

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
6,511
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
FWIW, a billon ions in a liter is hardly noticeable. :)

Well, since there are 6.022 * 10^23 ions in 1 mole, and only 1 billion ions = 1 * 10^9, then we are only adding around 1.66 BILLIONTHS of a MICROMOLE! Hardly "a lot of strontium"! LOL

FWIW, there are more than 30000000000000000000000000 water molecules in a liter, or 33 million billion billion. :D
Thanks! LOL I'm eating my words ;Eggonface
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm looking to the molecular weights of the various chloride salts of these metals for my answer. While the correlation between the molecular weight of a salt and the density of an aqueous solution of that salt of a given molarity is not entirely linear, there is a very strong correlation. Compare the MW of these salts with the density of a 1.0M solution at 20C:

upload_2017-9-9_11-56-8.png


I'm going with "E".
 

Ryan@ShelteredReef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Messages
257
Reaction score
299
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm looking to the molecular weights of the various chloride salts of these metals for my answer. While the correlation between the molecular weight of a salt and the density of an aqueous solution of that salt of a given molarity is not entirely linear, there is a very strong correlation. Compare the MW of these salts with the density of a 1.0M solution at 20C:

upload_2017-9-9_11-56-8.png


I'm going with "E".
+1
 

chefjpaul

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 21, 2014
Messages
3,278
Reaction score
4,667
Location
South Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm looking to the molecular weights of the various chloride salts of these metals for my answer. While the correlation between the molecular weight of a salt and the density of an aqueous solution of that salt of a given molarity is not entirely linear, there is a very strong correlation. Compare the MW of these salts with the density of a 1.0M solution at 20C:

upload_2017-9-9_11-56-8.png


I'm going with "E".
This makes more sense to me now.
 

reeferfoxx

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
6,511
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm looking to the molecular weights of the various chloride salts of these metals for my answer. While the correlation between the molecular weight of a salt and the density of an aqueous solution of that salt of a given molarity is not entirely linear, there is a very strong correlation. Compare the MW of these salts with the density of a 1.0M solution at 20C:

upload_2017-9-9_11-56-8.png


I'm going with "E".
This was interesting to me. You know, I'll admit I'm here to learn. I'd like to side with this but I'm just not finding enough information on SrCl2(strontium chloride). Other than it's a precursor for other Strontium compounds. I think what has really thrown me off is Randy is adding billions of ions of these elements into "seawater". An article from Stanford suggests the concentrations of common/conservative elements of ocean water would normalize to salinity. Therefore being uniformly distributed.
1 - Strontium
2 - Calcium
So, I'm changing my answer to F. All will be the same. (That's my final answer)
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm just not finding enough information on SrCl2(strontium chloride).
Google "crc handbook of chemistry and physics pdf". Chapter 8, in the sub-section titled "CONCENTRATIVE PROPERTIES OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS: DENSITY, REFRACTIVE INDEX, FREEZING POINT DEPRESSION, AND VISCOSITY."
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,832
Reaction score
21,967
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Strontium
 

Bubbles, bubbles, and more bubbles: Do you keep bubble-like corals in your reef?

  • I currently have bubble-like corals in my reef.

    Votes: 20 33.9%
  • I don’t currently have bubble-like corals in my reef, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 7 11.9%
  • I don’t currently have bubble-like corals in my reef, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 20 33.9%
  • I don’t currently have bubble-like corals in my reef and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 11 18.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 1 1.7%
Back
Top