- Joined
- Jun 27, 2023
- Messages
- 221
- Reaction score
- 215
- Location
- British Columbia
- What state or country do you live in
- Canada
Hey everyone,
I'm in the process of planning a tank upgrade (from a 30 gallon to hopefully a 90,) and I've decided to return to using Fluval Marine lighting. I originally ran a Fluval Nano Marine 3.0 over my reef back when it was housed in a Fluval Evo 13.5 gallon tank and really liked it but when I upgraded to the 30 I switched to a Nicrew SkyLED which I honestly think my corals and rose bubbletip anemones have really disliked. I remember having beautiful big fat nems - now I'm lucky if their circumference is as fat as a quarter. Also, they were gorgeous! Further, my montipora really hasn't grown much and a few of my zoas can be aptly described as grumpy. So's my torch coral, although my hammers have been happy campers ever since I added two actinic LEDENET bars.
But with my upgrade to (hopefully) a 90 gallon I'm waffling over whether or not I should:
A. Buy two more Fluval Nano Marine 3.0s to go with my existing one, so that I would be running three of them, or -
B. Buy two 48" Fluval Marine 3.0 bars.
Which option would give the best light spread? I have no interest whatsoever in growing acroporas but I do hope to grow some birdsnest or stylophora (plus the monti that I already have,) therefore I have accepted that I'll have to run at least two of these lights. Honestly it was a lot less annoying doing maintenance around the Fluval nano light than it has been doing it around the Nicrew SkyLED light bar but I want to do what is best for my corals!
At this point I won't consider going for a different brand of light. My heart simply remembers the Fluval app with misty longing and I simply cannot afford higher priced lighting anyway.
So what would you do? Is it better to have three smaller lights or is it better to have two long bars?
Thank you for reading!
I'm in the process of planning a tank upgrade (from a 30 gallon to hopefully a 90,) and I've decided to return to using Fluval Marine lighting. I originally ran a Fluval Nano Marine 3.0 over my reef back when it was housed in a Fluval Evo 13.5 gallon tank and really liked it but when I upgraded to the 30 I switched to a Nicrew SkyLED which I honestly think my corals and rose bubbletip anemones have really disliked. I remember having beautiful big fat nems - now I'm lucky if their circumference is as fat as a quarter. Also, they were gorgeous! Further, my montipora really hasn't grown much and a few of my zoas can be aptly described as grumpy. So's my torch coral, although my hammers have been happy campers ever since I added two actinic LEDENET bars.
But with my upgrade to (hopefully) a 90 gallon I'm waffling over whether or not I should:
A. Buy two more Fluval Nano Marine 3.0s to go with my existing one, so that I would be running three of them, or -
B. Buy two 48" Fluval Marine 3.0 bars.
Which option would give the best light spread? I have no interest whatsoever in growing acroporas but I do hope to grow some birdsnest or stylophora (plus the monti that I already have,) therefore I have accepted that I'll have to run at least two of these lights. Honestly it was a lot less annoying doing maintenance around the Fluval nano light than it has been doing it around the Nicrew SkyLED light bar but I want to do what is best for my corals!
At this point I won't consider going for a different brand of light. My heart simply remembers the Fluval app with misty longing and I simply cannot afford higher priced lighting anyway.
So what would you do? Is it better to have three smaller lights or is it better to have two long bars?
Thank you for reading!

