SPS Growth Challenge thread

Zyk5280b

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
126
Reaction score
63
Location
Colorado
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think it would work great for the intial testing but what about down the road when the frag isnt really a frag anymore and attached to the LR?
 

nater

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
885
Reaction score
1
Location
long island, ny
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1337214255.953400.jpg

Here is mine.
 

nater

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
885
Reaction score
1
Location
long island, ny
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes. It shouldn't make a difference since we are working on percent difference anyway.

I've been giving some thought to how we should measure the frags and I think I've come up with a decent method. The issue was that a graduated cylinder would be accurate, but wouldn't be large enough to hold the frag. A beaker would be large enough to hold the frag, but doesn't have enough markings to give you a precise enough measurement of the water displacement. With this method, you can use any size container to hold the frag, but will only need to purchase a graduated cylinder.


  1. First, you will need some sort of container that can hold the coral frag. Ideally, it would be around the same size as the frag and as narrow as possible.
  2. Next, fill the container with water to the top.
  3. Pour the water into a graduated cylinder and record the initial amount. I'm not sure what size we need yet, but I'm guessing around a 200 ml. I'll find out once I get my frag.
  4. Again, fill the container to the top with water (be sure to use water from your aquarium!) and place in the frag. Do this in a place where it won't matter when water spills out of the top.
  5. Pour the remaining water back into the graduated cylinder and record the amount. The difference between step 3 and step 5 is the amount of water displaced by the coral frag, i.e., the size of the frag.
  6. Each time you measure the frag, repeat steps 1-5. This way you can change the size of the container if the frag grows to large for the initial container (or you lose it) without affecting the results.

What do you all think?

CJ

This sounds about right to me. I believe I get the displacement method. Makes sense. Just wondering if said size container will be big enough as the coral gets larger. Anyhow I think we are on the right path here
 

Henry C

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
635
Reaction score
64
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a question, what happens when the frag starts growing on the rock work? Do we keep moving it around so it can't ? Do we keep it on a rack for the six months? Just thought i'd throw it out there as from what i'm seeing these frags are already or almost fully encrusted on the plugs.. just a tought..
 

laskopyre

Chuck
View Badges
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
546
Reaction score
9
Location
OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Got my frag today. Will post a pic when it is all acclimated and ready.
 

CJO

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
2,400
Reaction score
197
Location
Charlotte, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think it would work great for the intial testing but what about down the road when the frag isnt really a frag anymore and attached to the LR?

This sounds about right to me. I believe I get the displacement method. Makes sense. Just wondering if said size container will be big enough as the coral gets larger. Anyhow I think we are on the right path here

That's the good thing about this method- you can change the holding vessel as the coral grows without significantly affecting the results since you are measuring the water displaced with something else.

CJ
 

yellojello

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
366
Reaction score
165
Location
San Jose
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here's my little nugget. Just put in. Also got some other goodies from Adam in the same shipment :)

57236337136-vi.jpg

18236344624-vi.jpg
 

yellojello

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
366
Reaction score
165
Location
San Jose
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

CJO

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
2,400
Reaction score
197
Location
Charlotte, NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 53 42.1%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 4.0%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 49 38.9%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 37 29.4%

New Posts

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new