Tunze "contact" skimming vs countercurrent mode

  • Thread starter Thread starter Who me?
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Who me?

View Badges
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
360
Reaction score
318
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I'm interested in the 9004 DC for a small 30 gallon I'm setting up...
I noticed the new comline series skimmers are now set from the factory in contact skim mode with the impeller cover off. Does anyone know the advantages/ disadvantages to running it in contact mode as opposed to countercurrent mode?

From what I can gather, countercurrent mode would provide surface skimming but would also be more likely to introduce microbubbles from the bottom of the unit. But I'm sure there has to be more differences??

Thanks!
 
That is really the main difference. In contact skimming, waste diffuses in by osmosis, this method of skimming is plankton safe for this reason, but it is slower to respond to waste, it will generally remove the same amount of waste but not as rapidly.
 

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 5 25.0%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new