I am adding a new sump in my fish room, and I’m taking the opportunity to redo and clean up my plumbing. I was not planning to re-install the UV into a return line. I stumbled across an older BRS video where they said one of the mistakes people make is not installing into a return line and only using a closed loop in the sump.
This got me thinking if this really is detrimental to just have it on a closed loop in the sump?
Some of the high end sump makers such as MRC and deltec, have a chamber in the sump that just exposes sump water to UV light before it makes its way to the return chamber, So it’s not directly plumbed into the return line either, and is more or less behaving the same way a closed loop would if a pump or manifold feeding the UV goes from one sump chamber to another.
I am planning to exit the UV into the return chamber, so all the water coming out of the UV should make its way into the display anyways.
So interested if anyone has noticed a difference in water clarity, algae growth, or parasites when plumbing their uv via a sump closed loop vs return line installation?
This got me thinking if this really is detrimental to just have it on a closed loop in the sump?
Some of the high end sump makers such as MRC and deltec, have a chamber in the sump that just exposes sump water to UV light before it makes its way to the return chamber, So it’s not directly plumbed into the return line either, and is more or less behaving the same way a closed loop would if a pump or manifold feeding the UV goes from one sump chamber to another.
I am planning to exit the UV into the return chamber, so all the water coming out of the UV should make its way into the display anyways.
So interested if anyone has noticed a difference in water clarity, algae growth, or parasites when plumbing their uv via a sump closed loop vs return line installation?
