Very interesting thread - just got through what looks like a couple of days with many posts. Thanks to the OP and to those who are willing to say the status quo could - SHOULD - be improved. I really don't read anything radical in what Ronnie and others are saying. Asking for an honest discourse on current QC practices and ways to make them better seems like what a community like R2R should be all about.
Some of what I've read in this thread leads me to some thoughts to consider:
1. Pests would not be as frequently encountered if there were better controls in place at all points in the supply chain.
2. Dipping by itself is not effective in preventing pests - yet that seems to be what all the naysayers accept as de facto "treatment" from vendors.
3. More effective QT protocols would drive the cost of corals up. Despite that fact, it seems like a worthwhile goal.
4. In a
market where there are NO formal controls in place, pests will become the rule rather than the exception.
5. A lengthy QT process upstream of the hobbyist would make a dramatic difference in the prevalence of pests. We've all imagined what that might look like at the retail level - why not dream a little?
I haven't posted much in this forum or on the other big forum because it seems like anyone who wants to invite a serious discussion gets bashed. Come on, I enjoy raving about a beautiful coral as much as the next guy, but can't we salt and pepper in a few serious conversations here and there to keep things interesting? There are no sexy corals in this thread, but there is a notion on the table that could be game changing in our hobby. It's not radical but it would make a huge difference - not only for each of us as hobbyists, but for the future of this hobby we all love!