"List" of Zoanthids that have/don't have palytoxins...?

Sharkbait19

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
11,007
Reaction score
13,559
Location
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Species used to be classified by morphological distinction because that was the best way to infer phylogeny at the time; now we have genetic analysis which, although not perfect, is a much better indicator of phylogeny. The taxonomy of organisms is supposed to best reflect their phylogeny; classifying species through morphological traits can lead to polyphyletic classificaitons due to convergent evolution or certain traits not being good indicators of phylogeny. Even if someone is knowledge in morphology, depending on which traits they choose to look at, the classifications can be completely wrong.
Of course. Though in the case of Z. Vietnamensis, its phylogeny has been delineated by genetic analysis, and it can also be identified morphologically based on the knowledge we have. While DNA evidence is the best method for identifying the ancestry of any species, especially new species, in the case of this thread (and zoa ID in general, when we typically don’t have the tools at our disposal), morphology seems to be a pretty good method of determining identification.
 

Form or function: Do you consider your rock work to be art or the platform for your coral?

  • Primarily art focused.

    Votes: 18 8.1%
  • Primarily a platform for coral.

    Votes: 39 17.6%
  • A bit of each - both art and a platform.

    Votes: 148 66.7%
  • Neither.

    Votes: 11 5.0%
  • Other.

    Votes: 6 2.7%
Back
Top