"List" of Zoanthids that have/don't have palytoxins...?

Sharkbait19

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
11,036
Reaction score
13,588
Location
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Species used to be classified by morphological distinction because that was the best way to infer phylogeny at the time; now we have genetic analysis which, although not perfect, is a much better indicator of phylogeny. The taxonomy of organisms is supposed to best reflect their phylogeny; classifying species through morphological traits can lead to polyphyletic classificaitons due to convergent evolution or certain traits not being good indicators of phylogeny. Even if someone is knowledge in morphology, depending on which traits they choose to look at, the classifications can be completely wrong.
Of course. Though in the case of Z. Vietnamensis, its phylogeny has been delineated by genetic analysis, and it can also be identified morphologically based on the knowledge we have. While DNA evidence is the best method for identifying the ancestry of any species, especially new species, in the case of this thread (and zoa ID in general, when we typically don’t have the tools at our disposal), morphology seems to be a pretty good method of determining identification.
 

Tentacled trailblazer in your tank: Have you ever kept a large starfish?

  • I currently have a starfish in my tank.

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • Not currently, but I have kept a starfish in the past.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • I have never kept a starfish, but I hope to in the future.

    Votes: 6 35.3%
  • I have no plans to keep a starfish.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top