naw... I mean something more like this. On gross you could probably see fibrosis, but you wouldn't see copper granules without special tissue staining and a strong microscope.
Gross examination can only tell us so much. I 100% believe that you have spent a lot of time thinking about this subject, but honestly the only thing I can say from your picture is that there's a dead fish in the background. Otherwise it's kinda a "post hoc ergo ad hoc" sort of problem where you can say anything the fish experienced years ago is the cause of death.
But more importantly the liver is typically super charged in terms of it's ability to regenerate. If it doesn't kill you straight off, liver damage usually needs to be a chronic insult to cause health problems... but I've been wrong before. If data comes out that says I'm idiot, I'll recant and apologize. For now, I'm siding with the guy who has sent the liver out for professional analysis.
There is, I feel, a subjective "quick check" for fatty liver disease - I've noticed over the years, that there is a positive correlation with samples sent out for histopath coming back with reports of fatty degeneration if the sample floated when placed in the NBF fixative. I then noticed these same samples tended to float in seawater, while healthy liver tissue slowly sinks.
I had this grand idea to set up a series of solutions with varying density. Then, placing pieces of liver into each solution to find the "floating point". Then, send those liver samples out to get histopathology done. Finally, I would correlate the different liver densities with their corresponding level of lipidosis. The hope was that I could eventually measure lipidosis by floatation, and not need to send samples out for very expensive histo, that takes 6+ weeks to get back. However, I didn't get that project done before I retired.....
Jay