Hey everyone,
So I'm six months and six days into my first saltwater tank (50G Waterbox AIO), and I have learned a ton in this long/short time. First off, I definitely moved too fast, and I've subsequently pulled back and focused on stability and parameter fine-tuning. While I think I'm doing ok, my latest test compared to my ICP test compared to what's going on in my aquarium has me a bit confused.
All of my test results are stored here, with the latest results from yesterday as follows:
So for the questions:
So I'm six months and six days into my first saltwater tank (50G Waterbox AIO), and I have learned a ton in this long/short time. First off, I definitely moved too fast, and I've subsequently pulled back and focused on stability and parameter fine-tuning. While I think I'm doing ok, my latest test compared to my ICP test compared to what's going on in my aquarium has me a bit confused.
All of my test results are stored here, with the latest results from yesterday as follows:
- Temp: 78.7 - Consistent, and while I track in Hydros, I decided to start including it in my manual tests since it's a result with the Hanna Salinity Checker.
- Salinity: 1.025 - This is much improved from 1.021~0.23 of past tests; given the heat of AZ, my water evaporates a bit faster than most, so I've switched from RODI to saltwater in my ATO
- Calcium: 594 - Definitely higher, so I pulled back my dosing (which I track here)
- Nitrate HR: 17.3 - Fairly consistent, though it's wavered a bit
- Nitrate LR: 4.35 - It's consistent with past LR results compared to the HR, but I don't know if that's correct
- Nitrite ULR: 0.046 - From what I've read, this is harmless
- Phosphate ULR: 0.14 - It's stable and considerably lower after putting in RowaPhos
- Ph: 8 - Stable
- dKH: 10.1 - Stable
- Magnesium: 1410 - Stable
- Iodine: 0.06 - A tad high, but I just dosed it, so that could be why. I'm definitely an invert guy, and they don't complain.
- Ammonia: 0 - No complaints
So for the questions:
- Overall, I know that if it seems to be working for what it is, that's what it is, and that's fine. However, I want to make sure I'm enabling growth vs. survival, and I'm concerned my Phosphase ULR may be hurting that, especially after RowaPhos. Still, my indicators of aquarium health (my giant carpet anemone and clams) seem to be thriving, and obviously, they both strive for stability and establishment, plus my Goni is extended. Still, I figured the higher Phos would be more noticeable in impact.
- Calcium is high, but as I've read, as long as I keep things stable (I did pull back the daily dosing from 7.5mL to 6mL), it will eventually be absorbed, and it isn't too much of a concern.
- As far as number interpretations, I've shifted my ideal parameter values from my LFS to BRS, but this brings me to my last question. When I look at the Red Sea recommended dosing for NO3: PO4-X NOPOX, they note Phosphate for mixed reef could be as high as 0.12ppm and still be acceptable, whereas BRS says 0. While this is one of those "if it works great," I wanted to see if there was a consensus here. I feel like I'm throwing a lot at my Phosphate, with 50G of RowaPhos, Red Sea NOPOX at 4.5ML/day, and a liquid Phosphate remover from my LFS I'm dosing as well.