AEFW question

iReefer

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
203
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
recently i found out that couple of sps were turned white from the bottom up not bleaching any tissue so therefore i suspected that my sps got eaten slowly by AEFW, so I'm thinking to take the remaining sps out and dip then transfer them to different tank since i only have a few of them. So that way i can prevent and avoid more trouble later on cuz I always love Stick Corals no matter what, and dream one day my tank is gona be like you know TOTM status. SO anyway, how long do you think they (the AEFW) will survive if there is no SPS in the tank. OR are there any others option.? thanks
 

Dejavu

SPS Addict
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
309
Reaction score
2
Location
Grand Rapids, Mi
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The general rule is displat acro free for 6-7 weeks. Before you go though the trouble of setting up antoher tank, have you dip any of the acro in question? This would be the best way to find out if you have them.
 

TonyB

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
283
Reaction score
28
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Verify that you have them first. There are a lot of things that can cause tissue loss and it's not necessarily AEFW's. Remove one of the corals in question and dip it in Revive. If you've got worms they'll be floating around the container after the dip. Also look for the tell tale bite marks that they leave behind that look like white spots around the infected tissue.
 
OP
OP
I

iReefer

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
203
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
Yes I am very positive now, i just blowed directly on one of the acro and Wow they're just floating around and the fish love it.
 
Last edited:

gflat65

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
3,133
Reaction score
111
Location
Montgomery, Al.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You're in for a process that will likely still end with a lot of casualties... Pull everything from the main tank. Remove all areas where there is no tissue. Run a thick bead of glue around the spots you cut away. Dip everything. I use TMPCC (and swish swish swish). I tried Levamisole a few years back and it was pretty tragic. They were gone, though. Keep the acros in a QT with weekly dips and inspections. Remove all tissue left in the tank from encrustation on the rocks, too, as that will extend the 'out of tank' time (continued food source). No guarantees, but it'll make you love the idea of QT...

Going forward, always QT. I have several systems that are somewhat dedicated (no SPS in a few, no LPS in a few, no zoas in a few, etc.). If I don't set up a dedicated system for QT when I know I have some corals coming, I might put Acros in a system with no acros, etc. I usually set up a separate tank, unless I unexpectedly buy or only get a few frags. If going into an established system (devoid of like genus, etc.), they get a dip and inspection for a few weeks before going to the display. If they are going into a dedicated QT, I may skip the dip to reduce stress. I have a hard time with dedicated QT's holding parameters over time, so I sometimes just inspect for a longer period of time to reduce stress (no dips unless I see something). Removal of bases and dead skeleton before putting them into a display doesn't hurt. That takes away more potential egg areas. In addition to TMPCC dips for AEFW's, an Interceptor dip is a good idea, too. Red bugs aren't really that big a deal, but they can do some damage. If you can knock them out on the front end, much less to worry about. It's a lot of work, but when you lose some of your prize pieces to nudis or flat worms, the constant pain of QT'ing starts to outweight the short term ease of just dropping in the tank.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 54 41.9%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.9%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 50 38.8%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 38 29.5%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new