Aqua UV sterilizer setup question

teethdoctor23

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 11, 2022
Messages
919
Reaction score
949
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Looking into getting the Aqua UV 8-watt Sterilizer HOB for my tank and interested in seeing how other people have it set up. Any recommendations?
 

Quietman

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
3,242
Reaction score
10,841
Location
Indiana - born and bred
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Optimal use is to have the UV filter on a dedicated direct loop. Mine is currently in my return line. Next tank is planned to have dedicated loop. If you don't have any issues and this is for maintaining, you might get away with manifold install but anything happens it'll be best to set it up direct. Note you have it on a manifold and if you need to manage an outbreak, you can always move a pump in the display for a few weeks.

As for size, on a small tank I recommend sizing it so you can manage protozoan (ich) at the same flow as you do for algae (flow for 8x/ hour tank volume through UV). So that'll be a bit bigger but you'll have the higher exposure at the higher flow rate so coverage for both issues is constant. Again, you have variable flow and address as issues arise.
 
OP
OP
T

teethdoctor23

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 11, 2022
Messages
919
Reaction score
949
Location
USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Optimal use is to have the UV filter on a dedicated direct loop. Mine is currently in my return line. Next tank is planned to have dedicated loop. If you don't have any issues and this is for maintaining, you might get away with manifold install but anything happens it'll be best to set it up direct. Note you have it on a manifold and if you need to manage an outbreak, you can always move a pump in the display for a few weeks.

As for size, on a small tank I recommend sizing it so you can manage protozoan (ich) at the same flow as you do for algae (flow for 8x/ hour tank volume through UV). So that'll be a bit bigger but you'll have the higher exposure at the higher flow rate so coverage for both issues is constant. Again, you have variable flow and address as issues arise.
I have some Dino’s I’m currently trying to manage. They disappear into the water column at night time and reappear when the lights turn on so a UV is a perfect solution. Nitrates at at 3.0 phosphates at .07, by the way.

My plan was to put a pump into the display tank next to the return from the sump and place the HOB UV sterilizer on the opposite side of the tank. Do you think that will suffice? I don’t really want to plumb it into my return pump as my current setup makes it a hassle. Thank you for the feedback
 

Quietman

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
3,242
Reaction score
10,841
Location
Indiana - born and bred
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have some Dino’s I’m currently trying to manage. They disappear into the water column at night time and reappear when the lights turn on so a UV is a perfect solution. Nitrates at at 3.0 phosphates at .07, by the way.

My plan was to put a pump into the display tank next to the return from the sump and place the HOB UV sterilizer on the opposite side of the tank. Do you think that will suffice? I don’t really want to plumb it into my return pump as my current setup makes it a hassle. Thank you for the feedback
Same reason I installed my 15 watt AquaUV on my 170. Dinos. Took care of it right really quick. I found it very important to keep flow at 8x/hour for a few months. I dropped the return flow (one of the draw backs on using return flow) just a bit off that and they returned. Luckily, just dialed it back up and they went away again. After several months, they have returned even at lower flow.

And yes, I pump in the DT and return back to DT is perfect. I think it's even better to have intake lower in the water (that's just a feeling and not anything I can prove).
 

jkobel

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
224
Reaction score
111
Location
Boston, MA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Optimal use is to have the UV filter on a dedicated direct loop. Mine is currently in my return line. Next tank is planned to have dedicated loop. If you don't have any issues and this is for maintaining, you might get away with manifold install but anything happens it'll be best to set it up direct. Note you have it on a manifold and if you need to manage an outbreak, you can always move a pump in the display for a few weeks.

Can you please elaborate on this? Why is a direct loop better than a manifold install? I'm not clear on what you are gaining/losing.

Considering this as next piece of equipment and its challenging to figure out how to get it plumbed since I'll likely need to cut thru a wall and really want to get it right the first time :)

thx
 

Quietman

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
3,242
Reaction score
10,841
Location
Indiana - born and bred
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Can you please elaborate on this? Why is a direct loop better than a manifold install? I'm not clear on what you are gaining/losing.

Considering this as next piece of equipment and its challenging to figure out how to get it plumbed since I'll likely need to cut thru a wall and really want to get it right the first time :)

thx
Sure thing, but there are a few variables with UV filters to understand before deciding on what works best for you.

UV filteration is based on organism exposure to UV light (made up of UV-A, B and C but that knowledge really isn't needed for this, but very interesting to research). Different organisms require different exposure rates to result in sufficient damage to DNA to prevent reproducing (or outright death).

The only organisms impacted by UV are those that are free-floating at some point in their life-cycle. This includes many of the serious pests we face - ostreopsis dinos and marine white spot for example)

The classifications are broad and there's some bleed over but generally there's algae (that includes dinos) and pathogens (ich). The algae is based on high flow but requires less exposure (usually expressed at uwatt/sec2). Dinos can double in 20 minutes so getting the correct exposure at 8x tank volume /hour is critical if you have an outbreak. Pathogens are more advanced organisms and require 3-5x or more the exposure that algae does. However, pathogens do not reproduce as fast so the flow can be fairly low (few x tank volume per hour).

So as you can probably see, sizing the correct UV/flow rate requires some consideration. How do you get the min 30,000 uwatt/sec2 at 8x tank volume flow per hour for the "algae" as well as getting the high exposure needed (min 90,000 uwatt/sec2) for pathogens?

If your tank is smaller (say under 120 gallons) its fairly economical to run one large UV filter that can do both. BTW 'fairly economical' is upwards of $500-600 or more - what a hobby. A large UV (I don't like the term oversized, although it does exceed manufactures recommendation) will be able to produce the high UV needed for 'pathogens' at the flow rates needed for 'algae' so one pump, one speed set it and forget it (assuming your directing all tank flow through UV filter).

It is possible to us UV only to react instead of preventative. Then you can just have the UV standing by (even if installed) on a variable flow - either variable speed pump or ac pump with throttle and adjust as needed, but you will not have both at same time. This is very reasonable approach, run it for algae (which also provides water clarity) and drop speed if you have some disease outbreak.

Lots of words right? Almost done.

This is why I say it's easiest to have a UV on it's own direct loop - to and from the display tank. You can adjust flow either to the UV for specific issues or just keep it running for both (if sized correctly) and make any changes you want to manifold reactor without impacting UV flow.

If you have it on a manifold - make sure the UV output is going to display and not to sump. Otherwise you'll only get minimal performance as you can't really tell how much tank water is getting exposed. Honestly, for routine clarity without any outbreaks, that might be fine. Then if there's an outbreak, you can just remove the UV filter from the manifold - connect it to a pump with some hoses and drop it in the display tank for a few week.

So in summary...many options exist. Just be aware of how you want to manage the UV filtration; continual or as needed, what you want to manage, 'algae' or 'pathogens' or both, and ensure the flow rate provided and tank turnover through the filter will result in both the exposure needed for the UV filter rating and turnover to keep up with reproduction rates of certain organisms.

You'd think I'd copy this down and just paste it when asked...I really should. Anyways, best of luck. I know it's a lot to take in but I'm a huge proponent of UV filtration. Just buying my new upgrade and UV is key component.
 
Last edited:

Aquatic acrobat in your aquarium: Have you ever kept an eel?

  • I currently keep an eel in my tank.

    Votes: 24 13.7%
  • I have kept an eel in my tank in the past.

    Votes: 30 17.1%
  • I have not kept an eel in my tank, but I hope to in the future.

    Votes: 27 15.4%
  • I have no plans to keep an eel.

    Votes: 91 52.0%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 1.7%
Back
Top